• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations.金砖国家应对新冠疫情的心理反应比较分析
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:567585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585. eCollection 2021.
2
Core policies disparity response to COVID-19 among BRICS countries.金砖国家应对 COVID-19 的核心政策差异。
Int J Equity Health. 2022 Jan 20;21(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01614-z.
3
Political repression, civil society and the politics of responding to AIDS in the BRICS nations.金砖国家中的政治镇压、公民社会与应对艾滋病的政治
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Feb;31(1):56-66. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czv021. Epub 2015 Apr 8.
4
COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS countries and its association with socio-economic and demographic characteristics, health vulnerability, resources, and policy response.金砖国家的 COVID-19 大流行及其与社会经济和人口特征、健康脆弱性、资源和政策应对的关联。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 8;10(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00881-w.
5
The priority areas and possible pathways for health cooperation in BRICS countries.金砖国家卫生合作的优先领域和可能途径。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2023 Aug 28;8(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s41256-023-00318-x.
6
More recent insights into the breast cancer burden across BRICS-Plus: Health consequences in key nations with emerging economies using the global burden of disease study 2019.关于“金砖+”国家乳腺癌负担的最新见解:利用2019年全球疾病负担研究对新兴经济体主要国家的健康影响
Front Oncol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1100300. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1100300. eCollection 2023.
7
Waste electrical and electronic equipment management and Basel Convention compliance in Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) nations.巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)的废弃电子电气设备管理与《巴塞尔公约》合规情况
Waste Manag Res. 2016 Aug;34(8):693-707. doi: 10.1177/0734242X16652956. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
8
Physical Rehabilitation Needs in the BRICS Nations from 1990 to 2017: Cross-National Analyses Using Data from the Global Burden of Disease Study.1990 年至 2017 年金砖国家的物理康复需求:基于全球疾病负担研究数据的跨国分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 10;17(11):4139. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17114139.
9
Clinical trial trends over the last 5 years among the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) nations.金砖国家(巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非)过去5年的临床试验趋势。
Perspect Clin Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;15(3):128-133. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_179_23. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
10
'BRICS without straw'? A systematic literature review of newly emerging economies' influence in global health.“金砖无足轻重”?对新兴经济体在全球卫生中的影响力的系统文献回顾。
Global Health. 2013 Apr 15;9:15. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-15.

引用本文的文献

1
Epidemiological trends and projections of esophageal cancer in BRICS-plus: Based on the GBD 2021 database.金砖国家及其他新兴经济体食管癌的流行病学趋势与预测:基于全球疾病负担研究2021数据库
Front Oncol. 2025 Sep 1;15:1616702. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1616702. eCollection 2025.
2
Time trends in anxiety disorders incidence across the BRICS: an age-period-cohort analysis for the GBD 2021.BRICS 国家焦虑障碍发病率的时间趋势:基于 GBD 2021 的年龄-时期-队列分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 7;12:1467385. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1467385. eCollection 2024.
3
Insomnia symptoms during the covid-19 pandemic: a case-control study.新冠疫情期间的失眠症状:一项病例对照研究。
Rev Saude Publica. 2023 May 26;57(suppl 1):8s. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004801. eCollection 2023.
4
The Role of Psychology in Media During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-National Study.新冠疫情期间心理学在媒体中的作用:一项跨国研究。
Psychol Belg. 2022 Apr 12;62(1):136-151. doi: 10.5334/pb.1054. eCollection 2022.
5
Interplay of Nutrition and Psychoneuroendocrineimmune Modulation: Relevance for COVID-19 in BRICS Nations.营养与心理神经内分泌免疫调节的相互作用:对金砖国家新冠疫情的相关性
Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 17;12:769884. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.769884. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Practices and Outcomes of Promoting the Competencies of Psychological Assistance Professionals in Defeating the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Psychol Stud (Mysore). 2021;66(3):361-368. doi: 10.1007/s12646-021-00615-w. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
COVID-19: Challenges and its consequences for rural health care in India.新冠疫情:印度农村医疗面临的挑战及其后果
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2020 Nov;1:100009. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100009. Epub 2020 Dec 22.
3
A Follow-Up Investigation of Mental Health Among Discharged COVID-19 Patients in Wuhan, China.中国武汉新冠肺炎出院患者心理健康状况的随访调查
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 12;9:640352. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.640352. eCollection 2021.
4
COVID-19: a public health approach to manage domestic violence is needed.2019冠状病毒病:需要一种公共卫生方法来应对家庭暴力。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jun;5(6):e309. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30112-2. Epub 2020 May 10.
5
COVID-19 in Brazil: "So what?".巴西的新冠疫情:“那又怎样?”
Lancet. 2020 May 9;395(10235):1461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31095-3.
6
Violence against women, children, and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: overview, contributing factors, and mitigating measures.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间针对妇女、儿童和青少年的暴力行为:概述、促成因素及缓解措施
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Apr 30;36(4):e00074420. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00074420. eCollection 2020.
7
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response.利用社会和行为科学来支持 COVID-19 大流行应对。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 May;4(5):460-471. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
8
COVID-19 exacerbating inequalities in the US.新冠疫情加剧美国的不平等现象。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 18;395(10232):1243-1244. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30893-X.
9
Multidisciplinary research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic: a call for action for mental health science.2019冠状病毒病大流行的多学科研究重点:呼吁开展心理健康科学行动
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):547-560. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30168-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health.COVID-19 冠状病毒的爆发及其对全球心理健康的影响。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;66(4):317-320. doi: 10.1177/0020764020915212. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

金砖国家应对新冠疫情的心理反应比较分析

Comparative Analysis of Psychology Responding to COVID-19 Pandemic in Brics Nations.

作者信息

de Almondes Katie Moraes, Bizarro Lisiane, Miyazaki Maria Cristina Oliveira Santos, Soares Maria Rita Zoéga, Peuker Ana Carolina, Teodoro Maycoln, Modesto João Gabriel, Veraksa Aleksander N, Singh Purnima, Han Buxin, Sodi Tholene

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Brazil.

Institute of Psychology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 3;12:567585. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.567585
PMID:34149490
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8210845/
Abstract

The BRICS Forum, an independent international organization encouraging commercial, political, and cultural cooperation between Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, was formed in 2011, and these countries have a significant influence on their regional affairs. These nations were hit by COVID-19 at different times, and all adopted home quarantine to reduce the spread of the virus. We present a comparative analysis of actions of psychology and potential outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in BRICS nations regarding five aspects: psychology in health policies, social roles of psychology, socioeconomic context, actions for the general population, and health professionals during stage 1 of the pandemic, and possible actions in stage 2. Various types of actions were taken by psychologists in BRICS, with different levels of coordinated cooperation with respective governmental and non-governmental organizations, multiple and parallel efforts from different scientific societies, and professional regulatory agencies. Scientific societies have had an important role in coordinating some of these efforts, especially because they congregate the psychologists from different parts of these countries, improving communication and access to key information. The aim of these actions varies from improving situational skills and competences to increase the accessibility of psychological services and provide psychoeducation and telepsychology. We will consider the social importance of these actions within these countries as a global opportunity for psychology to stage in a complex context involving human health. The way psychology in BRICS will face this challenging situation is likely to produce important regional influence, stimulate scientific contribution, and increase the accessibility of psychology.

摘要

金砖国家论坛是一个鼓励巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非之间开展商业、政治和文化合作的独立国际组织,成立于2011年,这些国家对其地区事务有着重大影响。这些国家在不同时间受到了新冠疫情的冲击,均采取了居家隔离措施以减少病毒传播。我们对金砖国家在新冠疫情期间五个方面的心理行动及潜在结果进行了比较分析:健康政策中的心理、心理的社会角色、社会经济背景、疫情第一阶段针对普通民众的行动以及卫生专业人员的行动,以及第二阶段可能采取的行动。金砖国家的心理学家采取了各种行动,与各自的政府和非政府组织的合作协调程度不同,不同科学团体以及专业监管机构进行了多重并行的努力。科学团体在协调其中一些努力方面发挥了重要作用,特别是因为它们汇聚了这些国家不同地区的心理学家,改善了沟通并促进了关键信息的获取。这些行动的目的各不相同,从提高应对能力和技能到增加心理服务的可及性,以及提供心理教育和远程心理服务。我们将把这些行动在这些国家的社会重要性视为心理学在涉及人类健康的复杂背景下发挥作用的全球机遇。金砖国家的心理学应对这一具有挑战性局面的方式可能会产生重要的地区影响,激发科学贡献,并提高心理学的可及性。