• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字干预措施在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率方面的效果如何?系统评价和荟萃分析。

How effective are digital interventions in increasing flu vaccination among pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

The Unit of Academic Primary Care, Warwick Medical School, The University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

Leicester School of Nursing and Midwifery, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.

出版信息

J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):863-876. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab220.

DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdab220
PMID:34164686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9715302/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Flu can have serious consequences for pregnant woman and unborn babies. Vaccination provides safe and effective protection, yet uptake among pregnant women is below national targets. Digital interventions are effective at increasing adherence to health interventions.

AIMS

This review aimed to establish whether digital interventions are effective at increasing rates of flu vaccination among pregnant women, and to determine the overall effect size.

METHOD

Systematic searches identified digital intervention trials, aiming to increase rate of flu vaccination among pregnant women. Random-effects meta-analysis provided a combined effect size and examined which mode of digital interventions had the largest effects on flu vaccination.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the review. The majority of digital interventions were more effective at increasing rates of flu vaccination (7-81.3% uptake) than usual care or non-digital interventions (7.3-47.1% uptake). When meta-analysed, digital interventions had a small, non-significant effect (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.71, 2.31), P = 0.40. Text messages (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 0.58, 2.67), P = 0.57 appeared less effective than other digital interventions (OR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.02, 2.46), P = 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, there is a lack of high-quality studies reporting the effectiveness of digital interventions at increasing flu vaccination during pregnancy. Future interventions may benefit from using video or social media to communicate messages for maximum success in targeting an increase in rates of flu vaccination in pregnancy.

摘要

背景

流感可能对孕妇和胎儿造成严重后果。接种疫苗提供了安全有效的保护,但孕妇的接种率低于国家目标。数字干预措施在提高对健康干预措施的依从性方面非常有效。

目的

本综述旨在确定数字干预措施是否能有效提高孕妇的流感疫苗接种率,并确定总体效果大小。

方法

系统搜索确定了旨在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率的数字干预试验。随机效应荟萃分析提供了综合效果大小,并研究了哪种数字干预模式对流感疫苗接种的影响最大。

结果

综述纳入了 10 项研究。与常规护理或非数字干预措施(接种率为 7.3-47.1%)相比,大多数数字干预措施更有效地提高了流感疫苗接种率(接种率为 7-81.3%)。荟萃分析时,数字干预措施的效果较小,无统计学意义(比值比[OR] = 1.29,95%置信区间[CI]:0.71,2.31),P = 0.40。与其他数字干预措施相比,短信(OR = 1.25,95%CI:0.58,2.67)的效果似乎较差,P = 0.57。

结论

总体而言,缺乏高质量的研究报告表明数字干预措施在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率方面的有效性。未来的干预措施可能受益于使用视频或社交媒体来传播信息,以最大限度地提高针对提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率的目标成功。

相似文献

1
How effective are digital interventions in increasing flu vaccination among pregnant women? A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字干预措施在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率方面的效果如何?系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):863-876. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab220.
2
How effective are digital interventions in increasing flu vaccination amongst pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.数字干预措施在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率方面的效果如何?系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;9(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01372-z.
3
Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Preventing Alcohol Consumption in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.数字干预措施预防妊娠期饮酒的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 11;24(4):e35554. doi: 10.2196/35554.
4
Effectiveness of a Digital Intervention in Increasing Flu Vaccination-Related Risk Appraisal, Intention to Vaccinate and Vaccination Behaviour Among Pregnant Women.数字干预措施在提高孕妇对流感疫苗接种相关风险评估、接种意愿和接种行为方面的有效性。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):1033-1041. doi: 10.1177/10901981221077935. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Targeted client communication via mobile devices for improving maternal, neonatal, and child health.通过移动设备进行有针对性的客户沟通,以改善孕产妇、新生儿和儿童健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 14;8(8):CD013679. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013679.
6
7
The development of a digital intervention to increase influenza vaccination amongst pregnant women.一种旨在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率的数字干预措施的开发。
Digit Health. 2021 Apr 21;7:20552076211012128. doi: 10.1177/20552076211012128. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
8
Interventions to increase the uptake of seasonal influenza vaccination among pregnant women: A systematic review.提高孕妇季节性流感疫苗接种率的干预措施:一项系统评价。
Vaccine. 2016 Jan 2;34(1):20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
9
Improving influenza vaccination rates in pregnancy through text messaging: a randomized controlled trial.通过短信提高孕期流感疫苗接种率:一项随机对照试验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Apr;121(4):734-740. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828642b1.
10
Are digital interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy effective? A systematic review protocol.孕期戒烟的数字干预措施是否有效?一项系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 1;5(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0390-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions to increase the uptake of vaccines recommended during pregnancy.关于增加孕期推荐疫苗接种率的干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
NPJ Vaccines. 2025 Apr 19;10(1):76. doi: 10.1038/s41541-025-01120-1.
2
Attitudes and Experiences Regarding Communication About Maternal Vaccination: Qualitative Findings from Non-Hispanic Black Pregnant People.关于孕产妇疫苗接种沟通的态度与经历:非西班牙裔黑人孕妇的定性研究结果
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2025 Jan;34(1):1-7. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2024.0950. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies to promote vaccination uptake.系统评价和促进疫苗接种率的策略的荟萃分析。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Sep;8(9):1689-1705. doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-01940-6. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
4
Interventions to Improve Knowledge, Attitudes, and Uptake of Recommended Vaccines during Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Scoping Review.改善孕期和产后对推荐疫苗的知识、态度及接种率的干预措施:一项范围综述
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Nov 21;11(12):1733. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11121733.
5
Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施以增加孕妇 COVID-19、流感和百日咳疫苗接种率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Travel Med. 2023 Dec 28;30(8). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taad138.
6
Media Data and Vaccine Hesitancy: Scoping Review.媒体数据与疫苗犹豫:范围综述
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 10;2(2):e37300. doi: 10.2196/37300. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
7
Barriers and facilitators of vaccine hesitancy for COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis during pregnancy and in mothers of infants under two years: An umbrella review.COVID-19、流感和百白破疫苗接种犹豫的障碍和促进因素:孕期和两岁以下婴儿母亲的伞式综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 2;18(3):e0282525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282525. eCollection 2023.
8
Characteristics associated with influenza vaccination uptake in pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.与孕妇流感疫苗接种相关的特征:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2023 Jan 26;73(727):e148-e155. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0078. Print 2023 Feb.
9
Effectiveness of Digital Interventions for Preventing Alcohol Consumption in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.数字干预措施预防妊娠期饮酒的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 11;24(4):e35554. doi: 10.2196/35554.
10
Dancing during labor in the midst of COVID-19 outbreak: as an alternative non-pharmacological treatment after digital interventions.COVID-19 疫情期间的分娩舞蹈:数字化干预后的替代非药物治疗方法。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2022 Dec 1;44(4):e617-e618. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdab315.

本文引用的文献

1
Characteristics and outcomes of pregnant women admitted to hospital with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in UK: national population based cohort study.英国确诊感染 SARS-CoV-2 的住院孕妇的特征和结局:全国基于人群的队列研究。
BMJ. 2020 Jun 8;369:m2107. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2107.
2
How effective are digital interventions in increasing flu vaccination amongst pregnant women? A systematic review protocol.数字干预措施在提高孕妇流感疫苗接种率方面的效果如何?系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2020 May 28;9(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01372-z.
3
Efficacy of a Web-Based Intervention to Increase Uptake of Maternal Vaccines: An RCT.基于网络的干预措施提高产妇疫苗接种率的效果:一项 RCT 研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):e125-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
5
The Cost-Effectiveness of Digital Health Interventions on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases: Systematic Review.数字健康干预措施对心血管疾病管理的成本效益:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 17;21(6):e13166. doi: 10.2196/13166.
6
Are digital interventions for smoking cessation in pregnancy effective? A systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠期戒烟的数字干预措施是否有效?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Psychol Rev. 2018 Dec;12(4):333-356. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1488602. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Randomized Controlled Trial of Text Message Reminders for Increasing Influenza Vaccination.随机对照试验研究短信提醒对增加流感疫苗接种率的效果。
Ann Fam Med. 2017 Nov;15(6):507-514. doi: 10.1370/afm.2120.
8
Text4baby Influenza Messaging and Influenza Vaccination Among Pregnant Women.Text4baby 流感信息传递与孕妇流感疫苗接种
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6):845-853. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
9
Digital health behaviour change interventions targeting physical activity and diet in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对癌症幸存者身体活动和饮食的数字健康行为改变干预措施:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Dec;11(6):704-719. doi: 10.1007/s11764-017-0632-1. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
10
Can Communicating Personalised Disease Risk Promote Healthy Behaviour Change? A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.传达个性化疾病风险能否促进健康行为改变?系统评价的系统综述
Ann Behav Med. 2017 Oct;51(5):718-729. doi: 10.1007/s12160-017-9895-z.