Suppr超能文献

自动驾驶车辆与骑行:政策影响及管理问题

Autonomous vehicles and cycling: Policy implications and management issues.

作者信息

Pettigrew Simone, Nelson John D, Norman Richard

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, 1 King St, Sydney 20042, Australia.

Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100188. Epub 2020 Aug 10.

Abstract

Cycling as a form of active transport has great benefits for individuals and society, yet prevalence rates in many countries are low. The advent of autonomous vehicles (AVs) is likely to have substantial implications for cyclists, however little is known about the nature and magnitude of the likely impacts and the resulting implications for government planning and policy. The aim of this exploratory study was to consult with a range of stakeholder groups to identify relevant issues and stimulate debate about future efforts to maximize the benefits of vehicle autonomy for cycling outcomes. Interviews were conducted with key stakeholders representing government (local, state, and federal departments responsible for transport, health, and/or infrastructure), cycling organizations, technology firms, AV manufacturing/servicing companies, trade unions, the law, insurers (public and private), transport policy consortia, and academia. The results suggest that AVs have the potential to increase cycling prevalence while reducing cycling accidents, but that a range of issues will need to be addressed to optimize these outcomes. In particular, informed decisions need to be made about the infrastructure and equipment investments that could encourage larger numbers of commuters to select cycling as their primary form of transport.

摘要

骑自行车作为一种主动出行方式,对个人和社会都有极大益处,但在许多国家,其普及率却很低。自动驾驶汽车(AVs)的出现可能会给骑自行车的人带来重大影响,然而,对于可能产生的影响的性质和程度以及对政府规划和政策的影响,人们却知之甚少。这项探索性研究的目的是与一系列利益相关者群体进行磋商,以确定相关问题,并激发关于未来如何努力最大限度地提高车辆自主性对骑行成果的益处的讨论。研究人员采访了代表政府(负责交通、卫生和/或基础设施的地方、州和联邦部门)、自行车组织、科技公司、自动驾驶汽车制造/服务公司、工会、法律界、保险公司(公立和私立)、交通政策联盟以及学术界的关键利益相关者。结果表明,自动驾驶汽车有潜力提高自行车普及率,同时减少自行车事故,但需要解决一系列问题,以优化这些成果。特别是,需要就基础设施和设备投资做出明智决策,以鼓励更多通勤者选择骑自行车作为主要出行方式。

相似文献

1
Autonomous vehicles and cycling: Policy implications and management issues.
Transp Res Interdiscip Perspect. 2020 Sep;7:100188. doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2020.100188. Epub 2020 Aug 10.
2
The potential effects of autonomous vehicles on walking.
Glob Health Promot. 2022 Jun;29(2):60-67. doi: 10.1177/17579759211019219. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
3
Expert stakeholders' views on the potential nature and impacts of autonomous alcohol home delivery.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 Jul;42(5):996-1003. doi: 10.1111/dar.13574. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
5
Cycling infrastructure for reducing cycling injuries in cyclists.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD010415. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010415.pub2.
6
The perils of perfect performance; considering the effects of introducing autonomous vehicles on rates of car vs cyclist conflict.
Ergonomics. 2020 Aug;63(8):981-996. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1739326. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
7
Trusting autonomous vehicles as moral agents improves related policy support.
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 20;13:976023. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976023. eCollection 2022.
8
Brief Report: The Unrealized Potential of Autonomous Vehicles for an Aging Population.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(5):486-496. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1500860. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
9
Transporting Children in Autonomous Vehicles: An Exploratory Study.
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):278-287. doi: 10.1177/0018720819853993. Epub 2019 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Perceptions of safety on a shared road: Driving, cycling, or walking near an autonomous vehicle.
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:249-258. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
2
The perils of perfect performance; considering the effects of introducing autonomous vehicles on rates of car vs cyclist conflict.
Ergonomics. 2020 Aug;63(8):981-996. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2020.1739326. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
3
Brief Report: The Unrealized Potential of Autonomous Vehicles for an Aging Population.
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Oct-Dec;31(5):486-496. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1500860. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
4
The health benefits of autonomous vehicles: public awareness and receptivity in Australia.
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2018 Oct;42(5):480-483. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.12805. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
5
A Cost Benefit Analysis of an Active Travel Intervention with Health and Carbon Emission Reduction Benefits.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 11;15(5):962. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050962.
6
The neighbourhood physical environment and active travel in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Feb 6;14(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0471-5.
8
Can air pollution negate the health benefits of cycling and walking?
Prev Med. 2016 Jun;87:233-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 May 5.
9
Increasing active travel: results of a quasi-experimental study of an intervention to encourage walking and cycling.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015 Dec;69(12):1184-90. doi: 10.1136/jech-2015-205466. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
10
New walking and cycling routes and increased physical activity: one- and 2-year findings from the UK iConnect Study.
Am J Public Health. 2014 Sep;104(9):e38-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302059. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验