• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Challenges and opportunities for use of long-lasting insecticidal nets to prevent malaria during overnight travel in Uganda: a qualitative study.乌干达夜间旅行中使用长效驱虫蚊帐预防疟疾的挑战与机遇:一项定性研究。
Malar J. 2021 Jun 26;20(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03811-1.
2
Association between recent overnight travel and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets in rural Uganda: a prospective cohort study in Tororo.近期夜间旅行与乌干达农村地区使用长效驱虫蚊帐之间的关联:托罗罗前瞻性队列研究。
Malar J. 2020 Nov 11;19(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03475-3.
3
A Longitudinal Analysis of Mosquito Net Ownership and Use in an Indigenous Batwa Population after a Targeted Distribution.对目标分发后一个原住民巴特瓦人群蚊帐拥有情况和使用情况的纵向分析。
PLoS One. 2016 May 4;11(5):e0154808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154808. eCollection 2016.
4
Barriers of persistent long-lasting insecticidal nets utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: a qualitative study.在埃塞俄比亚西北部,阻碍人们持续长期使用长效驱虫蚊帐的因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):2828. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20319-w.
5
LLIN Evaluation in Uganda Project (LLINEUP): modelling the impact of COVID-19-related disruptions on delivery of long-lasting insecticidal nets on malaria indicators in Uganda.乌干达长效驱虫蚊帐评估项目(LLINEUP):模拟 COVID-19 相关干扰对乌干达长效驱虫蚊帐交付及其对疟疾指标影响的建模。
Malar J. 2024 Jun 6;23(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05008-8.
6
A qualitative study of use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for intended and unintended purposes in Adami Tullu, East Shewa Zone, Ethiopia.一项关于在埃塞俄比亚东绍阿地区阿达米图卢使用长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)的目的和非目的用途的定性研究。
Malar J. 2018 Feb 6;17(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2209-5.
7
A qualitative study on the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for the prevention of malaria in the Peruvian Amazon.一项关于在秘鲁亚马逊地区使用长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)预防疟疾的定性研究。
Malar J. 2019 Sep 2;18(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2937-1.
8
Challenges and opportunities associated with the introduction of next-generation long-lasting insecticidal nets for malaria control: a case study from Burkina Faso.引入下一代长效驱虫蚊帐以控制疟疾相关的挑战与机遇:来自布基纳法索的案例研究
Implement Sci. 2016 Jul 22;11:103. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0469-4.
9
Exploring the gap between coverage, access, and utilization of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs) among the households of malaria endemic districts in Bangladesh.探讨孟加拉国疟疾流行地区家庭中长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)的覆盖、获得和利用之间的差距。
Malar J. 2018 Dec 6;17(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2610-0.
10
Effectiveness of long-lasting insecticidal nets in prevention of malaria among individuals visiting health centres in Ziway-Dugda District, Ethiopia: matched case-control study.长效杀虫蚊帐预防埃塞俄比亚 Ziway-Dugda 区卫生中心就诊人群疟疾的效果:匹配病例对照研究。
Malar J. 2021 Jul 3;20(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03833-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Physical integrity and residual bio-efficacy of PBO-pyrethroid synergist-treated and pyrethroid-only LLINs after 1.5 years of field use in Western Kenya.在肯尼亚西部进行1.5年现场使用后,经PBO-拟除虫菊酯增效剂处理的蚊帐和仅含拟除虫菊酯的长效驱虫蚊帐的物理完整性及残余生物效能
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 12;20(8):e0330177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0330177. eCollection 2025.
2
"Injectable ARVs will give me peace" women's acceptability of injectable antiretroviral therapy in prevention of HIV vertical transmission in Uganda.“注射用抗逆转录病毒药物将给我带来安心”:乌干达女性对注射用抗逆转录病毒疗法预防艾滋病毒垂直传播的可接受性
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 16;15(1):25818. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10686-8.
3
Understanding international travelers' intentions to adopt protective behaviors against malaria during staying abroad: insights from a study of Chinese international travelers.了解国际旅行者在国外停留期间采取疟疾防护行为的意图:来自一项针对中国国际旅行者的研究的见解。
Global Health. 2025 Jul 4;21(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01132-5.
4
Inequity in the use of long-lasting insecticidal nets before and after nationwide mass distribution campaign in 48 districts of Uganda: VERSE toolkit analysis.乌干达48个地区全国大规模分发运动前后长效驱虫蚊帐使用情况的不平等:VERSE工具包分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2269. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23386-9.
5
"After a long day of play, I get tired and forget to unfurl my bednet": a qualitative study exploring factors affecting insecticide-treated bednet use among school-aged children in eastern.“玩了一整天后,我累了,忘了展开我的蚊帐”:一项定性研究,探讨影响东部学龄儿童使用经杀虫剂处理蚊帐的因素。
Res Sq. 2025 May 13:rs.3.rs-6623966. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6623966/v1.
6
Unraveling the dynamics of dengue in Metahara town, East Shewa, Oromia, Ethiopia, 2023.2023年埃塞俄比亚奥罗米亚州东谢瓦梅塔哈拉镇登革热动态解析
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Mar 17;19(3):e0012908. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012908. eCollection 2025 Mar.
7
A Qualitative Assessment of a Training and Communication Intervention on Antibiotic Prescription Practices Among Health Workers and Outpatients at Public Health Facilities in Uganda.乌干达公立卫生机构卫生工作者和门诊病人中抗生素处方实践培训和沟通干预的定性评估。
Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 25;77(Suppl 2):S191-S198. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad329.
8
Genetic and Genomic Researchers' Perspectives on Biological Sample Sharing in Collaborative Research in Uganda: A Qualitative Study.遗传和基因组研究人员对乌干达合作研究中生物样本共享的看法:一项定性研究。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2023 Jul;18(3):134-146. doi: 10.1177/15562646231171289. Epub 2023 May 7.
9
Implementation and acceptance of government-sponsored malaria control interventions in Meghalaya, India.印度梅加拉亚邦政府资助的疟疾控制干预措施的实施和接受情况。
Malar J. 2022 Jun 23;21(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04223-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of human exposure to early evening and outdoor biting mosquitoes and residual malaria transmission in Ethiopia.人类在傍晚和户外被蚊子叮咬的模式以及埃塞俄比亚疟疾残留传播。
Acta Trop. 2021 Apr;216:105837. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105837. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
2
Association between recent overnight travel and use of long-lasting insecticidal nets in rural Uganda: a prospective cohort study in Tororo.近期夜间旅行与乌干达农村地区使用长效驱虫蚊帐之间的关联:托罗罗前瞻性队列研究。
Malar J. 2020 Nov 11;19(1):405. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03475-3.
3
Malaria Diagnosed in an Urban Setting Strongly Associated with Recent Overnight Travel: A Case-Control Study from Kampala, Uganda.在城市环境中诊断出的疟疾与近期夜间旅行有很强的关联性:来自乌干达坎帕拉的一项病例对照研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Oct;103(4):1517-1524. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0189.
4
Variation of preventive practices and its association with malaria infection in eastern Indonesia: Findings from community-based survey.印度尼西亚东部预防措施的变化及其与疟疾感染的关联:基于社区的调查结果。
PLoS One. 2020 May 7;15(5):e0232909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232909. eCollection 2020.
5
Indoor residual spraying for malaria control in sub-Saharan Africa 1997 to 2017: an adjusted retrospective analysis.1997 年至 2017 年撒哈拉以南非洲的室内残留喷洒控制疟疾:调整后的回顾性分析。
Malar J. 2020 Apr 10;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03216-6.
6
Mapping the travel patterns of people with malaria in Bangladesh.绘制孟加拉国疟疾病人的旅行模式图。
BMC Med. 2020 Mar 4;18(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-1512-5.
7
Understanding the gap between access and use: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitators to insecticide-treated net use in Ghana.理解可及性和使用率之间的差距:加纳一项关于杀虫剂处理蚊帐使用障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
Malar J. 2019 Dec 12;18(1):417. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-3051-0.
8
How do people with refractory irritable bowel syndrome perceive hypnotherapy?: Qualitative study.难治性肠易激综合征患者如何看待催眠疗法?:定性研究。
Complement Ther Med. 2019 Aug;45:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.05.020. Epub 2019 May 20.
9
Human behaviour and residual malaria transmission in Zanzibar: findings from in-depth interviews and direct observation of community events.坦桑尼亚桑给巴尔的人类行为与残留疟疾传播:深入访谈和社区活动直接观察结果。
Malar J. 2019 Jul 1;18(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2855-2.
10
Patient-level Predictors of Extent of Exposure to a Community Health Worker Intervention in a Randomized Controlled Trial.患者层面预测因素对社区卫生工作者干预随机对照试验中暴露程度的影响。
Ethn Dis. 2019 Apr 18;29(2):261-266. doi: 10.18865/ed.29.2.261. eCollection 2019 Spring.

乌干达夜间旅行中使用长效驱虫蚊帐预防疟疾的挑战与机遇:一项定性研究。

Challenges and opportunities for use of long-lasting insecticidal nets to prevent malaria during overnight travel in Uganda: a qualitative study.

机构信息

Infectious Diseases Research Collaboration, Kampala, Uganda.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

出版信息

Malar J. 2021 Jun 26;20(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12936-021-03811-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12936-021-03811-1
PMID:34174892
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8235645/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Travel is a well-recognized risk factor for malaria. Within sub-Saharan Africa, travellers from areas of lower to higher transmission intensity are potentially at high risk of malaria. Long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are the primary tool for prevention of malaria, and their widespread use has contributed to substantial reductions in malaria burden. However, travellers often fail to use LLINs. To further explore the challenges and opportunities of using LLINs, travellers were interviewed in Uganda.

METHODS

In August and September 2019, 20 participants attending outpatient clinics at Naguru General Hospital in Kampala with a history of travel out of Kampala within the previous 60 days were purposively selected. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analysed thematically using NVivo 12.

RESULTS

Of the 20 participants, 13 were male. Thirteen of the 20 participants tested positive for malaria by microscopy, and 5 reported using of LLINs during travel. The main reasons for travel were to attend social events (weddings, funerals, overnight prayers) and for work. travellers who attended social events reported using LLINs less commonly than those who travelled for work. Challenges to using LLINs during travel included: (1) limited access to LLINs; (2) challenges in planning ahead of travel; (3) lack of space or ability to hang LLINs while travelling; (4) impression that LLINs in lodging places were unhygienic; (5) cultural beliefs discouraging use of LLINs during social events; (6) participation in overnight ceremonies; and (7) doubts about efficacy of LLINs. Positive factors influencing use of LLINs during travel included knowledge regarding malaria prevention and good affordability and availability of LLINs.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite good traveller knowledge regarding malaria control measures, use of LLINs was limited. Use of LLINs in the prevention of malaria among travellers from low to high transmission settings needs to be prioritized. This calls for increased behaviour change oriented communication to improve traveller preparedness and consideration of use of repellents in situations where LLINs may not be feasible. The Uganda Ministry of Health and Malaria Control Division should use educational messages to increase awareness about the risks of getting malaria during overnight travel through the media. Truck drivers should be sensitized through their companies to use the available space at the back of the trucks for hanging nets and consider using pop-up nets.

摘要

背景

旅行是疟疾公认的危险因素。在撒哈拉以南非洲,从低传播强度地区到高传播强度地区的旅行者都有感染疟疾的高风险。长效驱虫蚊帐(LLINs)是预防疟疾的主要工具,其广泛使用使疟疾负担大大减轻。然而,旅行者往往无法使用 LLINs。为了进一步探讨旅行者使用 LLINs 的挑战和机遇,我们在乌干达对旅行者进行了访谈。

方法

2019 年 8 月至 9 月,在坎帕拉纳加鲁综合医院(Naguru General Hospital)门诊就诊的 20 名旅行者中,选择了 20 名在过去 60 天内曾有过从坎帕拉以外地区旅行经历的旅行者进行有目的的选择。通过深入访谈收集数据,并使用 NVivo 12 进行主题分析。

结果

20 名参与者中,有 13 名男性。20 名参与者中有 13 名经显微镜检查疟原虫阳性,有 5 名报告在旅行中使用了 LLINs。旅行的主要原因是参加社交活动(婚礼、葬礼、通宵祈祷)和工作。参加社交活动的旅行者比因工作旅行的旅行者更不常使用 LLINs。旅行中使用 LLINs 的挑战包括:(1)LLINs 有限;(2)旅行前规划的挑战;(3)旅行时没有空间或能力悬挂 LLINs;(4)认为住宿场所的 LLINs 不卫生;(5)社交活动中不鼓励使用 LLINs 的文化信仰;(6)参加通宵仪式;(7)对 LLINs 疗效的怀疑。影响旅行者旅行时使用 LLINs 的积极因素包括对疟疾预防措施的了解以及 LLINs 的良好可负担性和可用性。

结论

尽管旅行者对疟疾控制措施有很好的了解,但 LLINs 的使用仍然有限。需要优先考虑在从低传播强度地区到高传播强度地区的旅行者中使用 LLINs 来预防疟疾。这需要加强以行为改变为导向的沟通,以提高旅行者的准备程度,并考虑在 LLINs 不可行的情况下使用驱虫剂。乌干达卫生部和疟疾控制司应通过媒体利用教育信息提高人们对夜间旅行中感染疟疾风险的认识。应通过公司提高卡车司机的认识,利用卡车后面的可用空间悬挂蚊帐,并考虑使用弹出式蚊帐。