• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与有监狱服刑经历者的合作:关于研究羁押场所癌症护理的思考

Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings.

作者信息

Visser Renske, Barber Alyce-Ellen, X Anthony, Wheatcroft Sue, Mullen Philip, Armes Jo

机构信息

University of Surrey, School of Health Sciences, Guildford, UK.

Revolving Doors Agency, 90 London Rd, Elephant and Castle, London, SE1 6LN, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z
PMID:34183075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8238630/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement is increasingly considered important in health research. This paper reflects, from both academic and lived experience perspectives, on involving people with lived experience in a study exploring cancer care in prison and how by doing this it enriched the research process.

METHODS

This paper is based on written and verbal reflections of the lived experience researchers and academic researchers involved in a study exploring the diagnosis and treatment of people with cancer in prison. The study comprised interviews with people with cancer in prison, prison healthcare staff, oncology specialists and custodial staff. Lived experience researchers were involved throughout the research process, including co-conducting interviews with patients and analysing interviews.

RESULTS

This paper highlights the importance and value of including lived experience researchers across the research process. We reflect on how lived experience of prison shapes the experience of conducting interviews and analysing data gathered in prison. We reflect on the working relationships between academic and lived experience researchers. We demonstrate how prison research is challenging, but collaboration between lived experience and academic researchers can help to better prepare for the field, to ask more meaningful questions and to create rapport with participants. These types of collaborations can be powerful avenues for skill development for both academic and lived experience researchers, but they require an investment of time and a willingness for shared learning.

CONCLUSIONS

For academics and lived experience researchers to collaborate successfully and meaningfully care needs to be taken to develop open, honest and equal working relationships. Skills development for academic and lived experience researchers is important. A commitment to building and maintaining relationships is crucial. Having a third party as a mediator can facilitate and foster these relationships. Particularly with people with lived experience of prison it is essential to put the 'do no harm' principle into practice and to have support in place to minimise this.

摘要

背景

患者及公众参与在健康研究中日益被视为重要因素。本文从学术和生活经验两个视角,反思了让有生活经验者参与一项探索监狱癌症护理的研究,以及这样做如何丰富了研究过程。

方法

本文基于参与一项探索监狱中癌症患者诊断与治疗研究的生活经验研究者和学术研究者的书面及口头反思。该研究包括对监狱中的癌症患者、监狱医护人员、肿瘤专家和监管人员进行访谈。生活经验研究者参与了整个研究过程,包括与患者共同进行访谈和分析访谈内容。

结果

本文强调了在整个研究过程中纳入生活经验研究者的重要性和价值。我们反思了监狱生活经历如何塑造在监狱进行访谈和分析所收集数据的体验。我们反思了学术研究者与生活经验研究者之间的工作关系。我们展示了监狱研究具有挑战性,但生活经验研究者与学术研究者之间的合作有助于更好地为实地研究做准备,提出更有意义的问题,并与参与者建立融洽关系。这类合作对于学术研究者和生活经验研究者而言都是强大的技能发展途径,但它们需要投入时间并愿意共同学习。

结论

为使学术研究者和生活经验研究者成功且有意义地合作,需要用心建立开放、诚实和平等的工作关系。学术研究者和生活经验研究者的技能发展很重要。致力于建立和维护关系至关重要。有第三方作为调解人可以促进和培养这些关系。特别是对于有监狱生活经验的人,将“不造成伤害”原则付诸实践并提供相应支持以尽量减少伤害至关重要。

相似文献

1
Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings.与有监狱服刑经历者的合作:关于研究羁押场所癌症护理的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z.
2
Actualizing community-academic partnerships in research: a case study on rural perinatal peer support.在研究中实现社区与学术机构的合作:一项关于农村围产期同伴支持的案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 18;8(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00407-0.
3
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.
4
A Blueprint for Involvement: Reflections of lived experience co-researchers and academic researchers on working collaboratively.参与蓝图:生活经验共同研究者和学术研究者对合作的反思
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 5;8(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00404-3.
5
"PPI? That sounds like Payment Protection Insurance": Reflections and learning from a substance use and homelessness study Experts by Experience group.“PPI?听起来像是支付保护保险”:来自有实际经验的专家小组对一项物质使用与无家可归问题研究的反思与经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 20;7(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00324-8.
6
The lived experience of co-production: Reflective accounts from the InCLUDE project.共同生产的生活体验:来自“纳入”项目的反思性叙述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 14;10(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00639-2.
7
Ready, set, co(produce): a co-operative inquiry into co-producing research to explore adolescent health and wellbeing in the Born in Bradford Age of Wonder project.准备,开始,共同(产出):在布拉德福德奇迹时代项目中,对共同开展研究以探索青少年健康与幸福进行的合作性探究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00578-y.
8
'Getting our voices heard in research: a review of peer researcher's roles and experiences on a qualitative study of adult safeguarding policy.在研究中让我们的声音被听到:对同伴研究者在成人保护政策定性研究中的角色和经历的综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 28;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00403-4.
9
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
10
Engaging a person with lived experience of mental illness in a collaborative care model feasibility study.让有精神疾病亲身经历的人参与一项协作式照护模式可行性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jan 8;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00247-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Public Involvement in Cancer Research: Collaborative Evaluation Using Photovoice.公众参与癌症研究:运用照片叙事法的协作评估
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Jul 28;11:e75741. doi: 10.2196/75741.
2
Cancer in prison: barriers and enablers to diagnosis and treatment.监狱中的癌症:诊断与治疗的障碍及促进因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Apr 29;72:102540. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102540. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
RISE-Vac-Co-production of Vaccine Education Materials with Persons Living in Prison.与监狱服刑人员合作制作疫苗教育材料
Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Apr;30(13):S56-S61. doi: 10.3201/eid3013.230812.
4
A virtuous cycle of co-production: Reflections from a community priority-setting exercise.良性的共同制定优先事项循环:来自社区共同制定优先事项实践的思考。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2514-2524. doi: 10.1111/hex.13851. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
5
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring patient and public involvement (PPI) and co-production approaches in mental health research: learning from the PARTNERS2 research programme.探索精神卫生研究中的患者及公众参与(PPI)和共同生产方法:借鉴PARTNERS2研究项目的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Sep 21;6:56. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00224-3. eCollection 2020.
2
Reflections on qualitative data analysis training for PPI partners and its implementation into practice.关于为公众参与和介入(PPI)伙伴提供定性数据分析培训及其在实践中的实施的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Aug 14;5:22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0156-0. eCollection 2019.
3
Patients participating as co-researchers in health research: A systematic review of outcomes and experiences.作为共同研究者参与健康研究的患者:结局与体验的系统评价
Scand J Public Health. 2020 Aug;48(6):617-628. doi: 10.1177/1403494819863514. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
4
Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.提高监狱研究质量:一项关于前罪犯服务使用者参与监狱自杀预防研究的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):100-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12590. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study.这值得吗?患者及公众对其参与健康研究的影响及其评估的看法:一项基于英国的定性访谈研究。
Health Expect. 2017 Jun;20(3):519-528. doi: 10.1111/hex.12479. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
6
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
7
Service-user involvement in forensic mental health care research: areas to consider when developing a collaborative study.服务使用者参与法医精神健康护理研究:在制定合作研究时需要考虑的领域。
J Ment Health. 2011 Oct;20(5):464-72. doi: 10.3109/09638231003728109. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
8
"Outing" the researcher: the provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity.“揭露”研究者:反思性的起源、过程与实践
Qual Health Res. 2002 Apr;12(4):531-45. doi: 10.1177/104973202129120052.