• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The lived experience of co-production: Reflective accounts from the InCLUDE project.共同生产的生活体验:来自“纳入”项目的反思性叙述。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 14;10(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00639-2.
2
Qualitative Study定性研究
3
Ready, set, co(produce): a co-operative inquiry into co-producing research to explore adolescent health and wellbeing in the Born in Bradford Age of Wonder project.准备,开始,共同(产出):在布拉德福德奇迹时代项目中,对共同开展研究以探索青少年健康与幸福进行的合作性探究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Apr 30;10(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00578-y.
4
Involving carer advisors in evidence synthesis to improve carers' mental health during end-of-life home care: co-production during COVID-19 remote working.让护理顾问参与证据综合工作以改善临终居家护理期间护理人员的心理健康:新冠疫情远程工作期间的共同制作。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;13(8):1-48. doi: 10.3310/TGHH6428.
5
'Getting our voices heard in research: a review of peer researcher's roles and experiences on a qualitative study of adult safeguarding policy.在研究中让我们的声音被听到:对同伴研究者在成人保护政策定性研究中的角色和经历的综述
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 28;8(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00403-4.
6
"We know that our voices are valued, and that people are actually going to listen": co-producing an evaluation of a young people's research advisory group.“我们知道我们的声音受到重视,而且人们真的会倾听”:共同开展一项针对青少年研究咨询小组的评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 20;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00419-4.
7
Co-designing a personalised care plan for patients with rectal cancer: reflections and practical learnings.为直肠癌患者共同设计个性化护理计划:思考与实践经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Feb 8;10(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00553-7.
8
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.通过经验探索与年轻伙伴建立研究合作关系的“方式”:从加拿大、荷兰和英国的六个项目中吸取的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Nov 17;8(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00400-7.
9
Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings.与有监狱服刑经历者的合作:关于研究羁押场所癌症护理的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z.
10
"PPI? That sounds like Payment Protection Insurance": Reflections and learning from a substance use and homelessness study Experts by Experience group.“PPI?听起来像是支付保护保险”:来自有实际经验的专家小组对一项物质使用与无家可归问题研究的反思与经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Nov 20;7(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00324-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-Development of the CoMUni Intervention: A Social-Media-Based Resource to Increase Mental Health Help-Seeking Behaviours in UK Undergraduates.CoMUni干预措施的联合开发:一种基于社交媒体的资源,用于增加英国本科生寻求心理健康帮助的行为。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70400. doi: 10.1111/hex.70400.
2
Square peg round hole: navigating operational and interdisciplinary challenges in a co-produced, community-based research partnership.方枘圆凿:在共同开展的、基于社区的研究合作关系中应对操作和跨学科挑战
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Aug 18;11(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00769-1.
3
Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health.公众参与复杂理论构建:情境在塑造儿童健康中作用的共同生成逻辑模型
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70346. doi: 10.1111/hex.70346.
4
Strategies for improving maternal care for ethnic minority women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries in the UK.英国改善对患有产科肛门括约肌损伤的少数民族妇女的孕产妇护理的策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 25;25(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12441-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-production practice and future research priorities in United Kingdom-funded applied health research: a scoping review.英国资助的应用健康研究中的共同生产实践和未来研究重点:范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Apr 2;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00838-x.
2
Mapping definitions of co-production and co-design in health and social care: A systematic scoping review providing lessons for the future.绘制健康和社会关怀领域中共同生产和共同设计的定义:为未来提供经验教训的系统范围界定综述。
Health Expect. 2022 Jun;25(3):902-913. doi: 10.1111/hex.13470. Epub 2022 Mar 23.
3
The Reflective Fostering Programme-improving the wellbeing of children in care through a group intervention for foster carers: a randomised controlled trial.《反思式养育方案——通过对寄养父母的小组干预来提高寄养儿童的幸福感:一项随机对照试验》。
Trials. 2021 Nov 25;22(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05739-y.
4
Patient and Public Involvement in research: A journey to co-production.患者和公众参与研究:共同创作之旅。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Apr;105(4):1041-1047. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
5
Editorial: Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge.社论:公众参与医疗保健:探索知识的共同生产
Front Sociol. 2019 Nov 12;4:73. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00073. eCollection 2019.
6
Co-production as an Emerging Methodology for Developing School-Based Health Interventions with Students Aged 11-16: Systematic Review of Intervention Types, Theories and Processes and Thematic Synthesis of Stakeholders' Experiences.共同生产作为一种新兴方法,用于开发面向 11-16 岁学生的基于学校的健康干预措施:干预类型、理论和过程的系统评价,以及利益相关者经验的主题综合。
Prev Sci. 2021 May;22(4):475-491. doi: 10.1007/s11121-020-01182-8. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
7
Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process.制定改善服务不足群体试验交付的路线图:来自英国多方利益相关者进程的结果。
Trials. 2020 Aug 1;21(1):694. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04613-7.
8
Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production.迷失在阴影中:关于共同生产阴暗面的思考
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 7;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
9
Research co-design in health: a rapid overview of reviews.健康领域的研究共同设计:综述快速概览。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 11;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0528-9.
10
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面:对于健康研究来说,其成本是否超过了收益?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.

共同生产的生活体验:来自“纳入”项目的反思性叙述。

The lived experience of co-production: Reflective accounts from the InCLUDE project.

作者信息

Izzidien Shayma, Stemp Rachael, Akram Sakab, Ahmed Sabbir, Rangel-Cristales Alay, Irvine Karen, Sharma Shivani, Midgley Nick

机构信息

Anna Freud, London, UK.

School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Oct 14;10(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00639-2.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-024-00639-2
PMID:39402631
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11475932/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The value of co-produced research in health and social care is increasingly recognised, but accounts into the processes and individual experiences of co-producing research are lacking. This paper describes the personal journeys of four researchers (two experts by foster caring experience and two experts by profession) throughout the life course of a co-produced research project exploring the barriers and facilitators to inclusive research in foster caring, the InCLUDE project.

METHODS

Each researcher kept a diary throughout the InCLUDE project of their personal reflections, questions, and learning. These were synthesised and reviewed by the researchers and two colleagues external to the team, and key themes were extracted.

RESULTS

Narratives constructed from the diaries are presented in relation to distinct aspects of the co-production journey, alongside illustrative quotes. These aspects include: motivations for starting the project; making sense of the project; defining roles and responsibilities; challenges; and reflections on acquired knowledge and skills. From these insights, the researchers present recommendations for others endeavouring to engage in co-produced research. These include: recognising vulnerabilities and challenges during the early stages of a project; creating safe spaces; seeing the value of diversity; harnessing individual strengths; establishing a strong routine; and ensuring equal voice.

CONCLUSIONS

This paper presents a novel perspective on the realities of co-produced research by documenting the lived experiences of researchers within the context of foster care research. It highlights the importance of both measurable, tangible project outcomes, and the personal and skills growth of team members. The consistent use of diaries is encouraged as a valuable practice to capture learning, progress and achievements throughout the co-production process.

摘要

背景

健康与社会护理领域联合开展研究的价值日益得到认可,但目前仍缺乏对联合研究过程及个人经历的描述。本文描述了四位研究人员(两位寄养照顾经验专家和两位专业专家)在一个联合研究项目“寄养照顾中包容性研究的障碍与促进因素研究项目(InCLUDE项目)”的整个生命周期中的个人历程。

方法

在InCLUDE项目期间,每位研究人员都记录了自己的个人思考、问题和学习心得。研究人员以及团队外部的两位同事对这些记录进行了综合和审查,并提取了关键主题。

结果

根据日记构建的叙述与联合研究过程的不同方面相关,并配有说明性引语。这些方面包括:启动项目的动机;理解项目;明确角色和责任;挑战;以及对所学知识和技能的反思。基于这些见解,研究人员为其他致力于开展联合研究的人提出了建议。这些建议包括:认识到项目早期阶段的脆弱性和挑战;创造安全的空间;认识到多样性的价值;发挥个人优势;建立良好的工作惯例;以及确保平等的话语权。

结论

本文通过记录研究人员在寄养照顾研究背景下的实际经历,对联合研究的现实情况提出了新颖的观点。它强调了可衡量的、切实的项目成果以及团队成员个人成长和技能提升的重要性。鼓励持续使用日记作为一种宝贵的做法,以记录联合研究过程中的学习、进展和成就。