Suppr超能文献

评估新冠疫情期间远程工作对科罗拉多州临床及转化医学科学家和工作人员的影响。

Assessing the impact of remote work during COVID-19 on clinical and translational scientists and staff in Colorado.

作者信息

Gilmartin Heather M, Connelly Brigid, Hebbe Annika, Battaglia Catherine, Kwan Bethany M

机构信息

Denver/Seattle Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value Driven Care, VHA Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, Aurora, CO, USA.

Health Systems, Management and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Dec 21;5(1):e71. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.570.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has required many clinical and translational scientists and staff to work remotely to prevent the spread of the virus. To understand the impact on research programs, we assessed barriers to remote work and strategies implemented to support virtual engagement and productivity. A mixed-methods RedCap survey querying the remote work experience was emailed to Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute (CCTSI) scientists and staff in April 2020. Descriptive analyses, Fisher's Exact tests, and content analysis were conducted. Respondents ( = 322) were primarily female ( = 240; 75%), 21-73 years old (mean = 42 years) with a PhD ( = 139; 44%) or MD ( = 56; 55%). Prior to COVID-19, 77% ( = 246) never or rarely (0-1 day a week) worked remotely. Remote work somewhat or greatly interfered with 76% ( = 244) of researchers' programs and 71% ( = 231) reported slowing or stopping their research. Common barriers included missing interactions with colleagues ( = 198; 62%) and the absence of routines ( = 137; 43%). Strategies included videoconferencing ( = 283; 88%), altering timelines and expectations ( = 180; 56%). Scientists and staff experienced interference with their research when they shifted to remote work, causing many to slow or stop research programs. Methods to enhance communication and relationships, support productivity, and collectively cope during remote work are available.

摘要

新冠疫情要求许多临床和转化医学科学家及工作人员远程办公,以防止病毒传播。为了解对研究项目的影响,我们评估了远程工作的障碍以及为支持虚拟互动和工作效率而实施的策略。2020年4月,我们通过电子邮件向科罗拉多临床与转化科学研究所(CCTSI)的科学家和工作人员发送了一份采用混合方法的RedCap调查问卷,询问他们的远程工作经历。我们进行了描述性分析、费舍尔精确检验和内容分析。受访者(n = 322)主要为女性(n = 240;75%),年龄在21至73岁之间(平均年龄 = 42岁),拥有博士学位(n = 139;44%)或医学博士学位(n = 56;55%)。在新冠疫情之前,77%(n = 246)的人从未或很少(每周0 - 1天)远程工作。远程工作对76%(n = 244)的研究人员的项目产生了一定或很大干扰,71%(n = 231)的人报告称其研究放缓或停止。常见障碍包括与同事缺少互动(n = 198;62%)和缺乏日常工作规律(n = 137;43%)。策略包括视频会议(n = 283;88%)、调整时间安排和预期(n = 180;56%)。科学家和工作人员转向远程工作时,其研究受到了干扰,导致许多人放缓或停止了研究项目。在远程工作期间,有一些方法可以加强沟通与人际关系、支持工作效率并共同应对困难。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验