知情同意：新冠疫情背景下的新老挑战
Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.
作者信息
Rothwell Erin, Brassil Donna, Barton-Baxter Marietta, Brownley Kimberly A, Dickert Neal W, Ford Daniel E, Kraft Stephanie A, McCormick Jennifer B, Wilfond Benjamin S
机构信息
Department of Ob/Gyn, School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Rockefeller University, New York, NY, USA.
出版信息
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 7;5(1):e105. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.401.
Abstract
In this paper, we address how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted informed consent for clinical research through examining experiences within Clinical and Translation Science Award (CTSA) institutions. We begin with a brief overview of informed consent and the challenges that existed prior to COVID-19. Then, we discuss how informed consent processes were modified or changed to address the pandemic, consider what lessons were learned, and present research and policy steps to prepare for future research and public health crises. The experiences and challenges for CTSA institutions offer an important perspective for examining what we have learned about informed consent and determining the next steps for improving the consent process.
摘要
在本文中，我们通过考察临床与转化科学奖（CTSA）机构内部的经验，探讨了新冠疫情如何影响临床研究的知情同意。我们首先简要概述了知情同意以及新冠疫情之前存在的挑战。然后，我们讨论了如何修改或改变知情同意流程以应对疫情，思考从中吸取了哪些经验教训，并提出为未来研究和公共卫生危机做准备的研究及政策措施。CTSA机构的经验和挑战为审视我们对知情同意的认识以及确定改进同意流程的下一步措施提供了重要视角。
相似文献
1
Informed consent: Old and new challenges in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.知情同意：新冠疫情背景下的新老挑战
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 7;5(1):e105. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.401.
2
Broad-scale informed consent: A survey of the CTSA landscape.广泛知情同意：对临床与转化科学奖（CTSA）领域的一项调查。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 23;3(5):253-260. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.397. eCollection 2019 Oct.
3
Challenges and lessons learned for institutional review board procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic.新型冠状病毒肺炎大流行期间机构审查委员会程序面临的挑战与经验教训
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Mar 16;5(1):e107. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.27.
4
Engaging community in the translational process: Environmental scan of adaptive capacity and preparedness of Clinical and Translational Science Award Program hubs.让社区参与转化过程：临床与转化科学奖计划中心适应能力与准备情况的环境扫描
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Jun 15;7(1):e1. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.419. eCollection 2023.
5
Informed consent and trial prioritization for clinical studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Stakeholder experiences and viewpoints.COVID-19 大流行期间临床研究的知情同意和试验优先级排序。利益相关者的经验和观点。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 30;19(4):e0302755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302755. eCollection 2024.
6
Challenges and Possible Solutions to Adapting to Virtual Recruitment: Lessons Learned from a Survey Study during the Covid-19 Pandemic.适应虚拟招聘的挑战和可能的解决方案：新冠疫情期间一项调查研究的经验教训。
Ethics Hum Res. 2022 Nov;44(6):23-31. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500148.
7
Prioritizing studies of COVID-19 and lessons learned.优先开展对2019冠状病毒病的研究及总结经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Apr 21;5(1):e106. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.784.
8
COVID-19 Vaccination: Guidance for Ethical, Informed Consent in a National Context.2019冠状病毒病疫苗接种：国家背景下的伦理、知情同意指南
Issues Law Med. 2021 Fall;36(2):127-162.
9
Re-engineering The Clinical Research Enterprise in Response to COVID-19: The Clinical Translational Science Award (CTSA) experience and proposed playbook for future pandemics.为应对新冠疫情对临床研究体系进行重塑：临床转化科学奖（CTSA）的经验及针对未来大流行的拟议行动指南。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Feb 18;5(1):e96. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.10.
10
Role of CTSA institutes and academic medical centers in facilitating preapproval access to investigational agents and devices during the COVID-19 pandemic.临床与转化科学奖机构及学术医疗中心在新冠疫情期间促进研究性药物和器械的审批前获取方面的作用。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Feb 26;5(1):e94. doi: 10.1017/cts.2021.15.
引用本文的文献
1
Towards better enrollment decision-making for perinatal clinical research: Reconsidering recruitment and consent processes to support family values and preferences.迈向更好的围产期临床研究入组决策：重新审视招募和同意程序以支持家庭价值观和偏好。
Semin Perinatol. 2025 Apr;49(3):152055. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2025.152055. Epub 2025 May 21.
2
Government Initiatives for Research Ethics During COVID-19 Pandemic in Korea.韩国 COVID-19 大流行期间的研究伦理政府倡议。
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e116. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e116.
3
A virtual recruitment protocol promotes enrollment of underrepresented groups in a diabetes prevention trial.一种虚拟招募方案促进了糖尿病预防试验中代表性不足群体的入组。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Feb 5;8(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.11. eCollection 2024.
4
Challenges and solutions in clinical research during the COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.2019年冠状病毒病大流行期间临床研究中的挑战与解决方案：一篇叙述性综述。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 6;6(8):e1482. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1482. eCollection 2023 Aug.
5
Informed Consent in COVID-19-Research: An Ethical Analysis of Clinical Studies Performed during the Pandemic.新冠疫情研究中的知情同意：对疫情期间开展的临床研究的伦理分析
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 17;11(12):1793. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121793.
6
Research recruitment and consent methods in a pandemic: a qualitative study of COVID-19 patients' perspectives.在大流行期间的研究招募和同意方法：一项关于 COVID-19 患者观点的定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 May 11;23(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01933-5.
7
Adaptive, platform trials assessing therapies for hospitalized COVID-19 patients: Informed consent forms omitted a few important elements of information.针对住院 COVID-19 患者的治疗方法的适应性、平台试验：知情同意书省略了一些重要的信息要素。
J Glob Health. 2023 May 12;13:06019. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06019.
8
Key ethical issues encountered during COVID-19 research: a thematic analysis of perspectives from South African research ethics committees.在 COVID-19 研究中遇到的关键伦理问题：南非研究伦理委员会观点的主题分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Feb 15;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00888-y.
9
Conducting clinical genomics research during the COVID-19 pandemic: Lessons learned from the CSER consortium experience.在 COVID-19 大流行期间开展临床基因组学研究：CSER 联盟经验教训。
Am J Med Genet A. 2023 Feb;191(2):391-399. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.63033. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
10
Rethinking informed consent in the time of COVID-19: An exploratory survey.新冠疫情下对知情同意的重新思考：一项探索性调查。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 27;9:995688. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.995688. eCollection 2022.
本文引用的文献
1
Assessing Parent Decisions About Child Participation in a Behavioral Health Intervention Study and Utility of Informed Consent Forms.评估父母关于孩子参与行为健康干预研究的决策和知情同意书的效用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209296. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9296.
2
Partnering With Patients to Bridge Gaps in Consent for Acute Care Research.与患者合作，弥合急性护理研究同意书中的差距。
Am J Bioeth. 2020 Jun;20(5):7-17. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1745931.
3
Impact of the digital divide in the age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代数字鸿沟的影响。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):1147-1148. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa078.
4
Evaluation of length and complexity of written consent forms in English and Hebrew for participation in clinical trials authorized in one medical institution in Israel: A descriptive study.评估以色列一家医疗机构授权的临床试验英文和希伯来文知情同意书的长度和复杂性：一项描述性研究。
Account Res. 2020 Apr;27(3):138-145. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2020.1731311. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
5
Ethical Tensions Resulting from Interpreter Involvement in the Consent Process.口译员参与同意过程所引发的伦理困境。
Ethics Hum Res. 2019 Jul;41(4):31-35. doi: 10.1002/eahr.500025.
6
The Challenges of Informed Consent in High-Stakes, Randomized Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review.高风险随机肿瘤试验中知情同意的挑战：一项系统评价
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Mar 28;4(1):2381468319840322. doi: 10.1177/2381468319840322. eCollection 2019 Jan-Jun.
7
Reframing Consent for Clinical Research: A Function-Based Approach.重新构建临床研究中的同意书：基于功能的方法。
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Dec;17(12):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
8
The Common Rule, Updated.《通用规则》更新版
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 16;376(7):613-615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1700736. Epub 2017 Jan 19.
9
Improving biobank consent comprehension: a national randomized survey to assess the effect of a simplified form and review/retest intervention.提高生物样本库知情同意理解度：一项评估简化表格及复查/重新测试干预效果的全国性随机调查
Genet Med. 2017 May;19(5):505-512. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.157. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Audio-visual presentation of information for informed consent for participation in clinical trials.用于参与临床试验的知情同意的信息视听展示。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 9;2014(5):CD003717. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003717.pub3.
Zotero 插件