• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

神经心理学学习缺陷可预测进食障碍患者的治疗结果。

Neuropsychological Learning Deficits as Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Eating Disorders.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

Psychiatry and Mental Health Group, Neuroscience Program, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge-IDIBELL, 08907 L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2021 Jun 23;13(7):2145. doi: 10.3390/nu13072145.

DOI:10.3390/nu13072145
PMID:34201433
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8308216/
Abstract

Eating disorders (EDs) are severe psychiatric illnesses that require individualized treatments. Decision-making deficits have been associated with EDs. Decision-making learning deficits denote a lack of strategies to elaborate better decisions that can have an impact on recovery and response to treatment. This study used the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) to investigate learning differences related to treatment outcome in EDs, comparing between patients with a good and bad treatment outcome and healthy controls. Likewise, the predictive role of impaired learning performance on therapy outcome was explored. Four hundred twenty-four participants (233 ED patients and 191 healthy controls) participated in this study. Decision making was assessed using the Iowa Gambling Task before any psychological treatment. All patients received psychological therapy, and treatment outcome was evaluated at discharge. Patients with bad outcome did not show progression in the decision-making task as opposed to those with good outcome and the healthy control sample. Additionally, learning performance in the decision-making task was predictive of their future outcome. The severity of learning deficits in decision making may serve as a predictor of the treatment. These results may provide a starting point of how decision-making learning deficits are operating as dispositional and motivational factors on responsiveness to treatment in EDs.

摘要

进食障碍(EDs)是严重的精神疾病,需要个体化治疗。决策缺陷与 EDs 有关。决策学习缺陷表示缺乏制定更好决策的策略,这可能会对康复和治疗反应产生影响。本研究使用爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)来研究与 ED 治疗结果相关的学习差异,比较治疗结果良好和不良的患者与健康对照组之间的差异。同样,还探讨了学习成绩受损对治疗结果的预测作用。424 名参与者(233 名 ED 患者和 191 名健康对照组)参加了这项研究。在任何心理治疗之前,使用爱荷华赌博任务评估决策。所有患者均接受心理治疗,并在出院时评估治疗结果。与治疗结果良好的患者和健康对照组相比,治疗结果不良的患者在决策任务中没有表现出进展。此外,决策任务中的学习表现可以预测他们的未来结果。决策中学习缺陷的严重程度可能是治疗的预测指标。这些结果可能为决策学习缺陷如何作为 ED 对治疗反应的特质和动机因素提供了一个起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/9d9bd97abd96/nutrients-13-02145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/5f1e0cc8f449/nutrients-13-02145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/608f00dffd21/nutrients-13-02145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/9d9bd97abd96/nutrients-13-02145-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/5f1e0cc8f449/nutrients-13-02145-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/608f00dffd21/nutrients-13-02145-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ba9/8308216/9d9bd97abd96/nutrients-13-02145-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Neuropsychological Learning Deficits as Predictors of Treatment Outcome in Patients with Eating Disorders.神经心理学学习缺陷可预测进食障碍患者的治疗结果。
Nutrients. 2021 Jun 23;13(7):2145. doi: 10.3390/nu13072145.
2
Clinical Usefulness of the Iowa Gambling Task in Severe Alcohol Use Disorders: Link with Relapse and Cognitive-Physiological Deficits.严重酒精使用障碍中爱荷华赌博任务的临床效用:与复发和认知生理缺陷的关联。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Nov;42(11):2266-2273. doi: 10.1111/acer.13873. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
3
Disturbances of motivational balance in chronic schizophrenia during decision-making tasks.慢性精神分裂症患者在决策任务中动机平衡的紊乱。
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012 Dec;66(7):573-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02403.x.
4
Decision-making of Prefrontal Patients with the Iowa Gambling Task: Unexpected Spared Performances and Preliminary Evidence for the Need of Alternative Measures.前额叶患者在爱荷华赌博任务中的决策:意外的保留表现及对替代测量方法需求的初步证据
Clin Neuropsychol. 2015;29(4):509-21. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2015.1050458. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
5
Differences in Learning and Persistency Characterizing Behavior in Chronic Pain for the Iowa Gambling Task: Web-Based Laboratory-in-the-Field Study.基于网络的现场实验室研究:慢性疼痛中用于 Iowa 赌博任务的学习和坚持特征的行为差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 6;24(4):e26307. doi: 10.2196/26307.
6
Impaired decision-making after traumatic brain injury: the Iowa Gambling Task.创伤性脑损伤后决策能力受损:爱荷华赌博任务
Brain Inj. 2014;28(8):1070-5. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2014.896943. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
7
Integrating frequency and magnitude information in decision-making in schizophrenia: An account of patient performance on the Iowa Gambling Task.精神分裂症决策过程中频率与量级信息的整合:对患者在爱荷华赌博任务中表现的阐述
J Psychiatr Res. 2015 Jul-Aug;66-67:16-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
8
Cognitive flexibility and decision-making in eating disorders and obesity.饮食失调和肥胖中的认知灵活性与决策制定
Eat Weight Disord. 2017 Sep;22(3):435-444. doi: 10.1007/s40519-016-0331-3. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
9
Impaired decision-making in symptomatic anorexia and bulimia nervosa patients: a meta-analysis.有症状的神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症患者的决策受损:一项荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2015 Dec;45(16):3377-91. doi: 10.1017/S003329171500152X.
10
Anorexia, bulimia, and obesity: shared decision making deficits on the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT).厌食症、贪食症和肥胖症:在爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)上的共同决策缺陷。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Jul;16(4):711-5. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000354. Epub 2010 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychoneurological Links Contributing to Body Mass Index and Eating Disorder Severity.心理神经学关联对体重指数和进食障碍严重程度的影响。
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 15;17(2):296. doi: 10.3390/nu17020296.
2
The current clinical approach to feeding and eating disorders aimed to increase personalization of management.当前针对进食和饮食障碍的临床方法旨在提高管理的个性化程度。
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):4-31. doi: 10.1002/wps.21263.
3
Executive functioning and treatment outcome among adolescents undergoing cognitive-behavioral therapy for binge-eating disorder.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of duration of illness on treatment nonresponse and drop-out: Exploring the relevance of enduring eating disorder concept.患病时间对治疗无反应和脱落的影响:探索持久的进食障碍概念的相关性。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):499-513. doi: 10.1002/erv.2822. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Change in decision-making skills and risk for eating disorders in adolescence: A population-based study.青少年决策技能变化与饮食失调风险:一项基于人群的研究。
Eur Psychiatry. 2020 Oct 13;63(1):e93. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.92.
3
Cognitive improvement following weight gain in patients with anorexia nervosa: A systematic review.
接受暴饮暴食症认知行为疗法的青少年的执行功能与治疗结果
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;66(1):64-74. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.14031. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
4
The Iowa Gambling Task: Men and Women Perform Differently. A Meta-analysis.爱荷华赌博任务:男性和女性表现不同。一项元分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2025 Mar;35(1):211-231. doi: 10.1007/s11065-024-09637-3. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
The Role of Food Addiction and Lifetime Substance Use on Eating Disorder Treatment Outcomes.食物成瘾和终身物质使用对饮食障碍治疗结果的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 27;15(13):2919. doi: 10.3390/nu15132919.
6
Impact of Impulsivity and Therapy Response in Eating Disorders from a Neurophysiological, Personality and Cognitive Perspective.从神经生理学、人格和认知角度看冲动性和治疗反应对饮食失调的影响。
Nutrients. 2022 Nov 25;14(23):5011. doi: 10.3390/nu14235011.
7
Is decision-making impairment an endophenotype of anorexia nervosa?决策障碍是否是厌食症的一种内表型?
Eur Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 21;65(1):e68. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2327.
8
Binge eating disorder.暴食障碍。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Mar 17;8(1):16. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00344-y.
神经性厌食症患者体重增加后的认知改善:系统评价。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2021 May;29(3):402-426. doi: 10.1002/erv.2796. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
4
Relationship between eating disorder duration and treatment outcome: Systematic review and meta-analysis.进食障碍持续时间与治疗效果的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Nov;53(11):1761-1773. doi: 10.1002/eat.23373. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
5
Does ADHD Symptomatology Influence Treatment Outcome and Dropout Risk in Eating Disorders? A longitudinal Study.注意缺陷多动障碍症状学是否会影响饮食失调症的治疗结果和辍学风险?一项纵向研究。
J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 20;9(7):2305. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072305.
6
Depressive symptoms rather than executive functioning predict group cognitive behavioural therapy outcome in binge eating disorder.抑郁症状而非执行功能预测暴食障碍的团体认知行为治疗结果。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 Nov;28(6):620-632. doi: 10.1002/erv.2768. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
7
COVID-19 and implications for eating disorders.2019冠状病毒病及其对饮食失调的影响。
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2020 May;28(3):239-245. doi: 10.1002/erv.2738.
8
Cognitive effort and amotivation in first-episode psychosis.首发精神病患者的认知努力和动机缺失。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 May;129(4):422-431. doi: 10.1037/abn0000509. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
9
Prevalence of eating disorders over the 2000-2018 period: a systematic literature review.2000-2018 年期间进食障碍的流行情况:系统文献回顾。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 May 1;109(5):1402-1413. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy342.
10
Suicide attempts in eating disorder subtypes: a meta-analysis of the literature employing DSM-IV, DSM-5, or ICD-10 diagnostic criteria.进食障碍亚型中的自杀尝试:采用 DSM-IV、DSM-5 或 ICD-10 诊断标准的文献荟萃分析。
Psychol Med. 2019 Jun;49(8):1237-1249. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003549. Epub 2018 Nov 29.