Roy-Vallejo Emilia, Sánchez Purificación Aquilino, Torres Peña José David, Sánchez Moreno Beatriz, Arnalich Francisco, García Blanco María José, López Miranda José, Romero-Cabrera Juan Luis, Herrero Gil Carmen Rosario, Bascunana José, Rubio-Rivas Manuel, Pintos Otero Sara, Martínez Sempere Verónica, Ballano Rodríguez-Solís Jesús, Gil Sánchez Ricardo, Luque Del Pino Jairo, González Noya Amara, Navas-Alcántara María Sierra, Cortés Rodríguez Begoña, Alcalá José Nicolás, Suárez-Lombraña Ana, Andrés Soler Jorge, Gómez-Huelgas Ricardo, Casas-Rojo José Manuel, Millán Núñez-Cortés Jesús
Department of Internal Medicine, La Princesa University Hospital, Healthcare Research Institute-La Princesa Biomedical Research Foundation, 28006 Madrid, Spain.
Department of Internal Medicine, La Paz University Hospital, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research (IdiPAZ), Autonomous University of Madrid, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 15;10(12):2642. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122642.
Our main aim was to describe the effect on the severity of ACEI (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor) and ARB (angiotensin II receptor blocker) during COVID-19 hospitalization. A retrospective, observational, multicenter study evaluating hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with ACEI/ARB. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis (IMV (invasive mechanical ventilation), NIMV (non-invasive mechanical ventilation), ICU admission (intensive care unit), and/or all-cause mortality). We evaluated both outcomes in patients whose treatment with ACEI/ARB was continued or withdrawn. Between February and June 2020, 11,205 patients were included, mean age 67 years (SD = 16.3) and 43.1% female; 2162 patients received ACEI/ARB treatment. ACEI/ARB treatment showed lower all-cause mortality ( < 0.0001). Hypertensive patients in the ACEI/ARB group had better results in IMV, ICU admission, and the composite outcome of prognosis ( < 0.0001 for all). No differences were found in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. Patients previously treated with ACEI/ARB continuing treatment during hospitalization had a lower incidence of the composite outcome of prognosis than those whose treatment was withdrawn (RR 0.67, 95%CI 0.63-0.76). ARB was associated with better survival than ACEI (HR 0.77, 95%CI 0.62-0.96). ACEI/ARB treatment during COVID-19 hospitalization was associated with protection on mortality. The benefits were greater in hypertensive, those who continued treatment, and those taking ARB.
我们的主要目的是描述在新冠肺炎住院期间,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)对病情严重程度的影响。这是一项回顾性、观察性、多中心研究,评估接受ACEI/ARB治疗的新冠肺炎住院患者。主要终点是预后综合结局(有创机械通气(IMV)、无创机械通气(NIMV)、重症监护病房(ICU)入院和/或全因死亡率)的发生率。我们评估了继续或停用ACEI/ARB治疗的患者的这两种结局。2020年2月至6月,共纳入11205例患者,平均年龄67岁(标准差=16.3),女性占43.1%;2162例患者接受了ACEI/ARB治疗。ACEI/ARB治疗显示全因死亡率较低(<0.0001)。ACEI/ARB组的高血压患者在IMV、ICU入院及预后综合结局方面结果更好(均<0.0001)。在主要不良心血管事件的发生率方面未发现差异。住院期间继续接受ACEI/ARB治疗的患者,其预后综合结局的发生率低于治疗中断的患者(风险比0.67,95%置信区间0.63-0.76)。ARB与比ACEI更好的生存率相关(风险比0.77,95%置信区间0.62-0.96)。新冠肺炎住院期间的ACEI/ARB治疗与死亡率降低相关。在高血压患者、继续治疗的患者以及服用ARB的患者中,这种益处更大。