Centre for Resilience in Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 43, 4021, Stavanger, Norway.
Faculty of Medicine & Health, School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jul 15;21(1):1401. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11468-3.
Responses from the H1N1 swine flu pandemic and the recent COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic provide an opportunity for insight into the role of health authorities' ways of communicating health risk information to the public. We aimed to synthesise the existing evidence regarding different modes of communication used by health authorities in health risk communication with the public during a pandemic.
We conducted a rapid scoping review. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for publications in English from January 2009 through October 2020, covering both the full H1N1 pandemic and the response phase during the COVID-19 pandemic. The search resulted in 1440 records, of which 48 studies met our eligibility criteria.
The present review identified studies across a broad interdisciplinary field of health risk communication. The majority focused on the H1N1 pandemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. A content analysis of the studies identified three categories for modes of communication: i) communication channels, ii) source credibility and iii) how the message is communicated. The identified studies on social media focused mainly on content and engagement, while studies on the effect of the use of social media and self-protective behaviour were lacking. Studies on the modes of communication that take the diversity of receivers in the field into account are lacking. A limited number of studies of health authorities' use of graphic and audio-visual means were identified, yet these did not consider/evaluate creative communication choices.
Experimental studies that investigate the effect of health authorities' videos and messages on social media platforms and self-protective behaviour are needed. More studies are needed across the fields of health risk communication and media studies, including visual communication, web design, video and digital marketing, at a time when online digital communication is central to reaching the public.
H1N1 猪流感大流行和最近的 COVID-19 冠状病毒大流行的应对措施为了解卫生当局向公众传达健康风险信息的方式提供了一个机会。我们旨在综合现有证据,了解卫生当局在大流行期间与公众进行健康风险沟通时使用的不同沟通模式。
我们进行了快速范围审查。从 2009 年 1 月至 2020 年 10 月,在 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 上以英文检索了涵盖整个 H1N1 大流行和 COVID-19 大流行应对阶段的出版物。搜索共产生了 1440 条记录,其中 48 项研究符合我们的入选标准。
本综述确定了健康风险沟通广泛跨学科领域的研究。大多数研究集中在 H1N1 大流行和 COVID-19 大流行上。对研究的内容分析确定了沟通模式的三个类别:i)沟通渠道,ii)来源可信度和 iii)信息传达方式。关于社交媒体的已识别研究主要集中在内容和参与度上,而缺乏关于使用社交媒体和自我保护行为效果的研究。缺乏考虑到该领域中接收者多样性的沟通模式研究。确定了少数关于卫生当局使用图形和视听手段的研究,但这些研究没有考虑/评估创造性的沟通选择。
需要进行实验研究,以调查卫生当局在社交媒体平台上发布的视频和消息以及自我保护行为的效果。在在线数字通信成为联系公众的主要方式的当下,健康风险沟通和媒体研究领域(包括视觉沟通、网页设计、视频和数字营销)都需要更多的研究。