Scrivener Catriona L
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 29;15:636424. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.636424. eCollection 2021.
Electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide non-invasive measures of brain activity at varying spatial and temporal scales, offering different views on brain function for both clinical and experimental applications. Simultaneous recording of these measures attempts to maximize the respective strengths of each method, while compensating for their weaknesses. However, combined recording is not necessary to address all research questions of interest, and experiments may have greater statistical power to detect effects by maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio in separate recording sessions. While several existing papers discuss the reasons for or against combined recording, this article aims to synthesize these arguments into a flow chart of questions that researchers can consider when deciding whether to record EEG and fMRI separately or simultaneously. Given the potential advantages of simultaneous EEG-fMRI, the aim is to provide an initial overview of the most important concepts and to direct readers to relevant literature that will aid them in this decision.
脑电图(EEG)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)可在不同的空间和时间尺度上提供大脑活动的非侵入性测量方法,为临床和实验应用提供关于脑功能的不同视角。同时记录这些测量方法旨在最大化每种方法的各自优势,同时弥补其弱点。然而,联合记录并非解决所有感兴趣的研究问题所必需的,并且通过在单独的记录环节中最大化信噪比,实验可能具有更强的统计能力来检测效应。虽然现有几篇论文讨论了支持或反对联合记录的理由,但本文旨在将这些论点综合成一个问题流程图,供研究人员在决定是单独记录还是同时记录EEG和fMRI时参考。鉴于同步EEG-fMRI的潜在优势,目的是提供最重要概念的初步概述,并引导读者阅读有助于他们做出这一决定的相关文献。