Suppr超能文献

因认为神经预后不良而撤掉生命维持治疗的频率。

Frequency of Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy for Perceived Poor Neurologic Prognosis.

作者信息

Steinberg Alexis, Abella Benjamin S, Gilmore Emily J, Hwang David Y, Kennedy Niki, Lau Winnie, Mullen Isabelle, Ravishankar Nidhi, Tisch Charlotte F, Waddell Adam, Wallace David J, Zhang Qiang, Elmer Jonathan

机构信息

Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

Department of Neurology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jul 13;3(7):e0487. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000487. eCollection 2021 Jul.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

To measure the frequency of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis among decedents in hospitals of different sizes and teaching statuses.

DESIGN

We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Four large teaching hospitals, four affiliated small teaching hospitals, and nine affiliated nonteaching hospitals in the United States.

PATIENTS

We included a sample of all adult inpatient decedents between August 2017 and August 2019.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We reviewed inpatient notes and categorized the immediately preceding circumstances as withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis, withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for nonneurologic reasons, limitations or withholding of life support or resuscitation, cardiac death despite full treatment, or brain death. Of 2,100 patients, median age was 71 years (interquartile range, 60-81 yr), median hospital length of stay was 5 days (interquartile range, 2-11 d), and 1,326 (63%) were treated at four large teaching hospitals. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis occurred in 516 patients (25%) and was the sole contributing factor to death in 331 (15%). Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis was common in all hospitals: 30% of deaths at large teaching hospitals, 19% of deaths in small teaching hospitals, and 15% of deaths at nonteaching hospitals. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis happened frequently across all hospital units. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis contributed to one in 12 deaths in patients without a primary neurologic diagnosis. After accounting for patient and hospital characteristics, significant between-hospital variability in the odds of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of inpatient deaths in this cohort occurred after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis. The rate of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis occurred commonly in all type of hospital settings. We observed significant unexplained variation in the odds of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived poor neurologic prognosis across participating hospitals.

摘要

未标注

为了衡量不同规模和教学状况的医院中,因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗的频率。

设计

我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

地点

美国的四家大型教学医院、四家附属小型教学医院和九家附属非教学医院。

患者

我们纳入了2017年8月至2019年8月期间所有成年住院死亡患者的样本。

测量与主要结果

我们查阅了住院病历,并将紧接之前的情况分类为因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗、因非神经原因而撤除维持生命治疗、限制或不给予生命支持或复苏、尽管接受了充分治疗仍发生心源性死亡或脑死亡。在2100名患者中,中位年龄为71岁(四分位间距,60 - 81岁),中位住院时间为5天(四分位间距,2 - 11天),1326名(63%)患者在四家大型教学医院接受治疗。因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗的有516名患者(25%),且是331名(15%)患者死亡的唯一促成因素。因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗在所有医院都很常见:大型教学医院死亡病例的30%、小型教学医院死亡病例的19%以及非教学医院死亡病例的15%。因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗在所有医院科室都频繁发生。在没有原发性神经诊断的患者中,因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗导致每12例死亡中有1例死亡。在考虑了患者和医院特征后,因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗的几率在医院之间仍存在显著差异。

结论

该队列中四分之一的住院死亡发生在因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗之后。因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗的发生率在所有类型的医院环境中都很常见。我们观察到,在参与研究的医院中,因认为神经预后不良而撤除维持生命治疗几率存在显著的无法解释的差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Computational Prognostic Modeling in Traumatic Brain Injury.颅脑创伤的计算预后建模。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1462:475-486. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-64892-2_29.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验