Legal Medicine and Toxicology, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Sci Prog. 2021 Jul-Sep;104(3):368504211033702. doi: 10.1177/00368504211033702.
A comparative case study (2017-2020) was conducted to identify demographic, social, medico-legal, and toxicological variables associated with non-fatal accidents in driving under the influence (DUI) subjects. A second aim was to identify the factors predictive of substance use disorders among subjects. Drivers charged with alcohol DUI (blood alcohol concentration (BAC) > 0.5) and/or psychoactive substance DUI were included; cases included those involved in an accident while intoxicated, and the comparison group included DUI offenders negative for road accident involvement. Significance was determined by chi-square and Mann-Whitney tests. To prevent confounding effects, a multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed. Our sample encompassed 882 subjects (381 in the case group and 501 in the comparison group). Parameters such as psychoactive substances and BAC at the time of the road crash/DUI and the day of the week, when subjects were involved in the road accident or found DUI, resulted in significant differences ( < 0.01) between groups. The model's independent variables of BAC > 1.5 g/L ( = 0.013), BAC > 2.5 g/L ( < 0.001), and concurrent alcohol and psychoactive substance use ( < 0.001) were independent risk factors for an accident. Smoking >20 cigarettes/day was an independent risk factor for unfitness to drive ( < 0.01). Unfitness to drive was based primarily on ethyl glucuronide levels >30 pg/mg. Our results suggest a detailed assessment of DUI subjects with variables associated with accidents (BAC > 1.5 g/L and concurrent intake of psychoactive substances). Hair analysis, including ethylglucuronide (EtG) concentration, should be always performed. Based on our results, nicotine use should be investigated in cases of driving license regranting.
一项 2017-2020 年的对比案例研究旨在确定与酒后驾车(DUI)非致命事故相关的人口统计学、社会、医学法律和毒理学变量。第二个目的是确定导致酒后驾车者出现物质使用障碍的因素。研究纳入了因血液酒精浓度(BAC)>0.5 而被指控酒驾和/或因使用精神活性物质而酒驾的司机;包括醉酒驾车发生事故的案例,以及未发生交通事故的对照组。采用卡方检验和曼-惠特尼检验来确定显著性。为了防止混杂效应,进行了多变量二元逻辑回归分析。我们的样本包括 882 名受试者(381 名在病例组,501 名在对照组)。在道路事故/酒驾和酒驾发生当天,当受试者发生道路事故或被发现酒驾时,精神活性物质和 BAC 等参数在组间存在显著差异(<0.01)。模型的独立变量 BAC>1.5 g/L(=0.013)、BAC>2.5 g/L(<0.001)和同时使用酒精和精神活性物质(<0.001)是发生事故的独立危险因素。每天吸烟>20 支是不适合驾驶的独立危险因素(<0.01)。不适合驾驶主要是基于乙基葡萄糖醛酸苷水平>30 pg/mg。我们的结果表明,应对酒后驾车者进行详细评估,评估与事故相关的变量(BAC>1.5 g/L 和同时摄入精神活性物质)。应始终进行毛发分析,包括乙基葡萄糖醛酸苷(EtG)浓度。根据我们的结果,在重新发放驾驶执照时应调查尼古丁的使用情况。