Saint Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Hartford, CT, USA.
Edward Hines Jr VA Hospital, Hines, IL, USA.
Arch Toxicol. 2021 Oct;95(10):3425-3432. doi: 10.1007/s00204-021-03124-x. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
Coronavirus variants are gaining strongholds throughout the globe. Despite early signals that SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus case numbers are easing up in the United States and during the middle of a (not so easy) vaccination roll out, the country has passed a grim landmark of 600,000 deaths. We contend that these numbers would have been much lower if the medical community undertook serious investigations into the potential of low doses of radiation (LDRT) as a mainstream treatment modality for COVID-19 pneumonia. LDRT has been posited to manifest anti-infectious and anti-inflammatory properties at doses of 0.3-1.0 Gy via the activation of the Nrf-2 pathway. Although some researchers are conducting well-designed clinical trials on the potential of LDRT, the deep-rooted, blind, and flawed acceptance of the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model for ionizing radiation has led to sidelining of this promising therapy and thus unimaginable numbers of deaths in the United States.
冠状病毒变种正在全球范围内占据主导地位。尽管有早期信号表明,在美国,新型冠状病毒病例数量在减缓,而且(并非那么容易)疫苗接种工作正在进行中,但该国已经跨过了 60 万死亡人数的严峻里程碑。我们认为,如果医学界认真调查低剂量辐射(LDRT)作为 COVID-19 肺炎主流治疗方式的潜力,这些数字本可以低得多。LDRT 已被提出通过激活 Nrf-2 通路,以 0.3-1.0Gy 的剂量表现出抗感染和抗炎特性。尽管一些研究人员正在对 LDRT 的潜力进行精心设计的临床试验,但对电离辐射的线性无阈(LNT)模型根深蒂固、盲目和有缺陷的接受,导致这种有前途的治疗方法被搁置,从而导致美国出现了难以想象的死亡人数。