Hoth Patrick, Bieler Dan, Friemert Benedikt, Franke Axel, Blätzinger Markus, Achatz Gerhard
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Rekonstruktive und Septische Chirurgie, Sporttraumatologie, Bundeswehrkrankenhaus Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Deutschland.
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, Wiederherstellungs- und Handchirurgie, Verbrennungsmedizin, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Rübenacher Straße 170, 56072, Koblenz, Deutschland.
Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb). 2022 Jul;125(7):542-552. doi: 10.1007/s00113-021-01046-y. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
Worldwide terrorist activities since "9/11" and subsequently also in the European region have led to a rethinking in the context of the evaluation of critical infrastructure in Germany, also with respect to security at and in hospitals.
This publication deals with the evaluation of existing concepts on topics such as "alerting", "security", "communication" and "preparation" in the aforementioned context.
Based on a literature review as well as a survey among participants of the 3rd emergency conference of the DGU (German Society for Trauma Surgery), this topic and the currently existing situation are further analyzed and presented.
The data obtained illustrate that while the majority of hospitals have a hospital alert and response planning, the frequency of updates and intrahospital communication to increase awareness show significant variation. Furthermore, the results illustrate a heterogeneity of the existing intrahospital alerting concepts as well as a lack of security concepts and cooperation with security and guard services. Furthermore, it is evident that the topic of a possible CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) threat is not yet adequately perceived or implemented in the risk analysis.
The latent threat of terrorist activities appears to have led German hospitals to address the issue of hospital alarm and response planning in their assessment as critical infrastructure and to have implemented this for the most part; however, the subordinated areas and the consequences that can be derived from alarm planning do not yet show the necessary stringency to ultimately ensure adequate responses in these special scenarios with respect to security in and at German hospitals.
自“9·11”事件以来全球范围内的恐怖活动,以及随后在欧洲地区发生的恐怖活动,促使德国重新思考关键基础设施的评估问题,医院的安全保障也在评估范围内。
本出版物探讨在上述背景下对“警报”“安全”“通信”和“准备”等主题的现有概念进行评估。
基于文献综述以及对德国创伤外科学会第三届急诊会议参与者的调查,对该主题及当前现状进行进一步分析和阐述。
所获数据表明,虽然大多数医院都有医院警报和应对计划,但更新频率以及为提高认知度而进行的院内通信存在显著差异。此外,结果显示现有院内警报概念存在异质性,且缺乏安全概念以及与安保服务的合作。此外,很明显,在风险分析中,化学、生物、放射、核(CBRN)威胁这一可能主题尚未得到充分认识或实施。
恐怖活动的潜在威胁似乎促使德国医院在将自身评估为关键基础设施时着手处理医院警报和应对计划问题,并在很大程度上予以实施;然而,从属领域以及警报计划可能产生的后果尚未展现出必要的严格性,以最终确保在这些特殊情况下德国医院内部及周边安全方面能做出充分应对。