• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年哮喘患者的疾病负担及治疗依从性

Disease burden and treatment adherence among children and adolescent patients with asthma.

作者信息

Averell Carlyne M, Laliberté François, Germain Guillaume, Slade David J, Duh Mei S, Spahn Joseph

机构信息

GlaxoSmithKline plc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.

Groupe d'analyse, Ltée, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2022 Aug;59(8):1687-1696. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1955377. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1080/02770903.2021.1955377
PMID:34346263
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess asthma burden and medication adherence in a US de-identified patient level claims database.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study used the IQVIA PHARMETRICS PLUS database to identify patients aged 5-17 years, diagnosed with asthma between 01/01/2012-09/30/2017 (asthma cohort), and those initiating treatment with twice-daily inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or twice-daily ICS/long-acting beta agonists (LABA) (treatment cohorts; index date = first dispensing). Patient characteristics, asthma medication, and healthcare resource utilization were assessed over a 12-month baseline period. Treatment cohort endpoints were assessed in a 12-month follow-up period, including: adherence using proportion of days covered (PDC); persistence (no gap >45 days between dispensings).

RESULTS

The asthma cohort included 186,868 patients (112,689 children, mean age 7.9 years; 74,179 adolescents, mean age 14.3 years). During baseline, 34.5% used ICS or ICS/LABA, 24% used oral corticosteroids, 11.1% had ≥1 asthma-related emergency department visit, 2.2% had ≥1 asthma-related hospitalization. Among treatment cohorts, 47,276 and 10,247 patients initiated twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA, respectively (mean ages: 9.9; 12.5 years). Mean PDC adherence to twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA was 30% and 34% at 6 months (PDC ≥0.8: 4.3%; 6.1%); 21% and 24% at 12 months (PDC ≥0.8: 1.8%; 2.8%). Persistence with twice-daily ICS and ICS/LABA was 10.1% and 14.2% at 6 months; 5.6% and 8.0% at 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

A large disease burden and unmet need exist among US children/adolescent asthma patients, evidenced by low use of, and poor adherence to, ICS-containing medication, the notable proportion of oral corticosteroid users, and higher-than-expected asthma-related emergency department and hospitalization rates.

摘要

目的

在美国一个去除身份标识的患者层面索赔数据库中评估哮喘负担和药物依从性。

方法

这项回顾性观察性研究使用IQVIA PHARMETRICS PLUS数据库来识别年龄在5至17岁之间、在2012年1月1日至2017年9月30日期间被诊断为哮喘的患者(哮喘队列),以及那些开始接受每日两次吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)或每日两次ICS/长效β受体激动剂(LABA)治疗的患者(治疗队列;索引日期=首次配药)。在12个月的基线期内评估患者特征、哮喘药物和医疗资源利用情况。在12个月的随访期内评估治疗队列终点,包括:使用覆盖天数比例(PDC)评估依从性;持续性(两次配药之间无间隔>45天)。

结果

哮喘队列包括186,868名患者(112,689名儿童,平均年龄7.9岁;74,179名青少年,平均年龄14.3岁)。在基线期,34.5%的患者使用ICS或ICS/LABA,24%的患者使用口服糖皮质激素,11.1%的患者有≥1次与哮喘相关的急诊科就诊,2.2%的患者有≥1次与哮喘相关的住院治疗。在治疗队列中,分别有47,276名和10,247名患者开始每日两次使用ICS和ICS/LABA(平均年龄:9.9岁;12.5岁)。每日两次使用ICS和ICS/LABA的平均PDC依从性在6个月时分别为30%和34%(PDC≥0.8:4.3%;6.1%);在12个月时分别为21%和24%(PDC≥0.8:1.8%;2.8%)。每日两次使用ICS和ICS/LABA的持续性在6个月时分别为10.1%和14.2%;在12个月时分别为5.6%和8.0%。

结论

美国儿童/青少年哮喘患者中存在巨大的疾病负担和未满足的需求,这表现为含ICS药物的使用和依从性差、口服糖皮质激素使用者比例显著、以及高于预期的与哮喘相关的急诊科就诊率和住院率。

相似文献

1
Disease burden and treatment adherence among children and adolescent patients with asthma.儿童和青少年哮喘患者的疾病负担及治疗依从性
J Asthma. 2022 Aug;59(8):1687-1696. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2021.1955377. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
Medication adherence in patients with asthma using once-daily versus twice-daily ICS/LABAs.每日一次和每日两次ICS/LABA 治疗哮喘患者的用药依从性。
J Asthma. 2021 Jan;58(1):102-111. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1663429. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
3
Impact of adherence to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists on asthma outcomes in the United States.在美国,吸入皮质类固醇/长效β-激动剂治疗依从性对哮喘结局的影响。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2022 Jan-Dec;16:17534666221116997. doi: 10.1177/17534666221116997.
4
Association between previous health care use and initiation of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among US patients with asthma.美国哮喘患者中既往医疗保健使用与吸入皮质类固醇和长效β2-肾上腺素能激动剂联合治疗起始的相关性。
Clin Ther. 2009 Nov;31(11):2574-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.11.007.
5
Combination of inhaled long-acting beta2-agonists and inhaled steroids versus higher dose of inhaled steroids in children and adults with persistent asthma.吸入长效β2受体激动剂与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用与高剂量吸入性糖皮质激素治疗儿童和成人持续性哮喘的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD005533. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005533.
6
Appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist combination therapy among asthma patients in a US commercially insured population.美国商业保险人群中哮喘患者吸入性糖皮质激素与长效β2肾上腺素能激动剂联合疗法的合理使用情况
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Sep;25(9):2251-8. doi: 10.1185/03007990903155915.
7
Persistence and Adherence to ICS/LABA Drugs in UK Patients with Asthma: A Retrospective New-User Cohort Study.英国哮喘患者对 ICS/LABA 药物的坚持和依从性:一项回顾性新使用者队列研究。
Adv Ther. 2020 Jun;37(6):2916-2931. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01344-8. Epub 2020 May 2.
8
Use of leukotriene receptor antagonists are associated with a similar risk of asthma exacerbations as inhaled corticosteroids.白三烯受体拮抗剂的使用与吸入性糖皮质激素引发哮喘加重的风险相似。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014 Sep-Oct;2(5):607-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
9
Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, disease burden, and persistence/adherence in patients with asthma initiating inhaled triple therapy: real-world evidence from Japan.在起始吸入三联疗法的哮喘患者中的临床特征、治疗模式、疾病负担和持续/依从性:来自日本的真实世界证据。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2020 Jun;36(6):1049-1057. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2020.1763937. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Assessment of COPD-related outcomes in patients initiating a once daily or twice daily ICS/LABA.评估每日一次或每日两次 ICS/LABA 起始治疗的 COPD 患者相关结局。
Respir Med. 2019 Apr;150:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.01.019. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Burden of Treatment in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Evaluated by Focus Groups.通过焦点小组评估1型糖尿病儿童和青少年的治疗负担
Pediatr Diabetes. 2025 Jun 12;2025:8833434. doi: 10.1155/pedi/8833434. eCollection 2025.
2
Expert Consensus on Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy for the Treatment of Asthma in Adult Patients.成人哮喘治疗单吸入器三联疗法专家共识
Open Respir Arch. 2025 May 13;7(3):100442. doi: 10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100442. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
3
Bibliometric analysis of transition readiness in adolescents with chronic diseases.
慢性病青少年过渡准备情况的文献计量分析
Health Care Transit. 2025 May 21;3:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.hctj.2025.100105. eCollection 2025.
4
Sub-Optimal Compliance to Long-Term Inhalation Strategies and Poorer Health Care Outcomes Associated with Extended Tattoos in Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Bronchial Asthma.轻度至中度支气管哮喘青少年长期吸入治疗策略依从性欠佳及纹身面积扩大与健康护理结局较差的相关性
Children (Basel). 2024 Oct 17;11(10):1254. doi: 10.3390/children11101254.
5
Guardian's knowledge and attitude towards inhaled corticosteroids aerosol therapy and medication compliance of children with wheezing diseases.监护人对喘息性疾病患儿吸入性糖皮质激素气雾剂治疗的认知、态度及用药依从性
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2024 Jul 24;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13223-024-00908-5.
6
Asthma and COPD: Comparison with International Guidelines and Medication Adherence in Belgium.哮喘与慢性阻塞性肺疾病:与国际指南的比较及比利时的药物依从性
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Jul 20;16(7):1030. doi: 10.3390/ph16071030.
7
The Extra Cost Due to Non-Adherence to Inhaled Treatments in Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Persistent Asthma.轻度至中度持续性哮喘青少年不坚持吸入治疗所产生的额外费用
Children (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;10(4):615. doi: 10.3390/children10040615.
8
Effects of Adherence to Once-Daily Treatment on Lung Function, Bronchial Hyperreactivity and Health Outcomes in Adolescents with Mild-to-Moderate Asthmoka: A Twelve-Month Survey.每日一次治疗依从性对轻度至中度哮喘青少年肺功能、支气管高反应性及健康结局的影响:一项为期十二个月的调查
Children (Basel). 2022 Nov 29;9(12):1854. doi: 10.3390/children9121854.
9
Analysis of the Consumption of Drugs Prescribed for the Treatment of Asthma in Belgian Children.分析比利时儿童治疗哮喘的处方药物消费情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 4;19(1):548. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010548.