College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Cell and Molecular Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
School of Medicine Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
ILAR J. 2021 Sep 24;60(3):334-340. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilab023.
Researchers have worked with animals as models for decades to expand our knowledge of basic biological processes and to systematically study the physiology of disease. In general, the public has an expectation that work with animals has a purpose and will ultimately reap benefits. The likelihood of such an outcome is directly dependent on the quality of the science being conducted with those animals. However, not all frameworks for consideration of the ethics around animal research overtly consider scientific quality. In the following review, we explore the complex relationship between scientific quality and animal research ethics. We advocate for the development of a detailed "Harm-Yield Analysis" for the evaluation of biomedical animal research that emphasizes scientific quality along with societal benefit in the ethical justification of the research. We reflect on the lost opportunity to establish best practices in animal research early in the career of scientists by introducing in the curriculum and encouraging the use of a paradigm of the iterative consideration of the ethics of animal research alongside other aspects of experimental design.
几十年来,研究人员一直以动物为模型,来拓展我们对基本生物过程的认识,并系统地研究疾病的生理学。一般来说,公众期望动物实验工作有目的,并最终会带来好处。这种结果的可能性直接取决于用这些动物进行的科学的质量。然而,并非所有考虑动物研究伦理的框架都明确考虑了科学质量。在下面的综述中,我们探讨了科学质量与动物研究伦理之间的复杂关系。我们主张制定一种详细的“伤害-收益分析”,用于评估生物医学动物研究,在研究的伦理论证中,除了强调社会利益外,还应强调科学质量。我们反思了在科学家职业生涯早期就错失了在动物研究方面建立最佳实践的机会,我们在课程中引入并鼓励使用一种范式,即迭代地考虑动物研究的伦理问题,以及实验设计的其他方面。