Lledó Lourdes, Giménez-Pardo Consuelo
Departamento de Biomedicina y Biotecnología, Universidad de Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona km 33.6, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Pathogens. 2021 Jul 3;10(7):836. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070836.
Limited information is available on the presence of rickettsial infection in animal reservoirs in Spain. Antibodies against and were therefore sought in the sera of farm, domestic and wild animals ( = 223 samples) in an area of northern Spain. Indirect immunofluorescence assays showed: (A) 17/120 and 16/120 (14.2% and 13.3%) of serum samples from sheep (farm animals) reacted with and antigens, respectively; (B) 10/73 and 10/73 (13.7% and 13.7%) of samples from dogs (domestic animals) did the same; (C) as did 22/30 and 20/30 (73.3% and 66.6%) of samples from deer (wild animals) (overall titre range: 1/40 to 1/1280). The prevalence of both types of infection was significantly greater in the wild animals than either the farm or domestic animals. The largest titres were recorded for in all three groups.
关于西班牙动物宿主中是否存在立克次氏体感染的信息有限。因此,在西班牙北部一个地区的农场、家养和野生动物(共223份样本)血清中寻找抗[具体病原体1]和[具体病原体2]的抗体。间接免疫荧光试验显示:(A)绵羊(农场动物)的17/120和16/120份血清样本(分别占14.2%和13.3%)与[具体病原体1]和[具体病原体2]抗原发生反应;(B)狗(家养动物)的10/73和10/73份样本(均占13.7%)也是如此;(C)鹿(野生动物)的22/30和20/30份样本(分别占73.3%和66.6%)同样如此(总体滴度范围:1/40至1/1280)。两种感染类型在野生动物中的流行率显著高于农场动物或家养动物。在所有三组中,[具体病原体1]的滴度最高。