INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, UFR des Sciences du Sport, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, F-21000 Dijon, France.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 26;18(15):7912. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157912.
There is a wide range of cadence available to cyclists to produce power, yet they choose to pedal across a narrow one. While neuromuscular alterations during a pedaling bout at non-preferred cadences were previously reviewed, modifications subsequent to one fatiguing session or training intervention have not been focused on. We performed a systematic literature search of PubMed and Web of Science up to the end of 2020. Thirteen relevant articles were identified, among which eleven focused on fatigability and two on training intervention. Cadences were mainly defined as "low" and "high" compared with a range of freely chosen cadences for given power output. However, the heterogeneity of selected cadences, neuromuscular assessment methodology, and selected population makes the comparison between the studies complicated. Even though cycling at a high cadence and high intensity impaired more neuromuscular function and performance than low-cadence cycling, it remains unclear if cycling cadence plays a role in the onset of fatigue. Research concerning the effect of training at non-preferred cadences on neuromuscular adaptation allows us to encourage the use of various training stimuli but not to say whether a range of cadences favors subsequent neuromuscular performance.
尽管在非最佳踏频下进行踏蹬运动时的神经肌肉变化已被前人综述过，但对于疲劳后或训练干预后的改变，还没有专门进行过研究。我们对PubMed 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统的文献检索，检索截至 2020 年底。共确定了 13 篇相关文章，其中 11 篇关注疲劳性，2 篇关注训练干预。与给定功率输出下自由选择的踏频范围相比，踏频主要定义为“低”和“高”。然而，所选踏频、神经肌肉评估方法和所选人群的异质性使得研究之间的比较变得复杂。尽管高踏频和高强度的踏蹬比低踏频的踏蹬更能损害神经肌肉功能和性能，但踏频是否会导致疲劳的发生仍不清楚。关于非最佳踏频训练对神经肌肉适应影响的研究使我们能够鼓励使用各种训练刺激，但不能确定踏频范围是否有利于随后的神经肌肉表现。
