• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychometric properties of the German version of the Depressive and Anxious Avoidance in Prolonged Grief Questionnaire (DAAPGQ).《延长哀伤障碍中抑郁和焦虑回避问卷(DAAPGQ)德语版的心理测量特性》。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0254959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254959. eCollection 2021.
2
How thinking hurts: Rumination, worry, and avoidance processes in adjustment to bereavement.思维如何伤人:哀悼调整过程中的反刍、担忧和回避。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jul;27(4):548-558. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2440. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
3
Validation of the Brazilian brief version of the temperament auto-questionnaire TEMPS-A: the brief TEMPS-Rio de Janeiro.验证 TEMPS-A 气质自动问卷的巴西简版:里约热内卢简版 TEMPS。
J Affect Disord. 2011 Nov;134(1-3):65-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.02.005. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
4
Validation of a German Version of the Grief Cognitions Questionnaire and Establishment of a Short Form.德文版悲伤认知问卷的验证及简版的编制
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 18;11:620987. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.620987. eCollection 2020.
5
Assessment of grief-related rumination: validation of the German version of the Utrecht Grief Rumination Scale (UGRS).悲伤相关反刍的评估:德国版乌得勒支悲伤反刍量表(UGRS)的验证。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1630-1.
6
Utrecht grief rumination scale (UGRS): Psychometric study of validation of the Portuguese version.乌得勒支悲伤反刍量表(UGRS):葡萄牙文版本验证的心理测量研究。
Death Stud. 2024;48(8):766-776. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2023.2272984. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Measuring body image during pregnancy: psychometric properties and validity of a German translation of the Body Image in Pregnancy Scale (BIPS-G).孕期体像测量:德国版孕期体像量表(BIPS-G)的心理测量学特性和效度。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Jul 12;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2386-4.
8
Validity and Reliability Study of Turkish Forms of the Quality of Relationships Inventory-Bereavement Version and the Bereavement Guilt Scale.《关系质量量表-丧亲版和丧亲愧疚量表土耳其文版的有效性和信度研究》。
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2022 Winter;33(4):263-273. doi: 10.5080/u26027.
9
Widening epidemiological data on the prevalence of child maltreatment: Validation of the German ICAST-R in a student sample and national household survey.关于儿童虐待发生率不断扩大的流行病学数据:德国ICAST-R在学生样本和全国家庭调查中的验证
Child Abuse Negl. 2023 Mar;137:106038. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106038. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Turkish version of the Pet Bereavement Questionnaire: Validity, reliability and psychometric properties.《宠物丧亲问卷》土耳其语版本:效度、信度及心理测量特性
Death Stud. 2023;47(2):130-138. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2022.2034073. Epub 2022 Mar 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Testing the cognitive-behavioral model of prolonged grief disorder (PGD): distinct and shared pathways to PTSD and depression.检验持续性悲伤障碍(PGD)的认知行为模型:通往创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症的不同及共同途径。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;13(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03078-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the new DSM-5-TR criteria for prolonged grief disorder and the PG-13-Revised (PG-13-R) scale.新的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版修订版(DSM-5-TR)中持续性悲伤障碍标准及PG-13修订版(PG-13-R)量表的验证
World Psychiatry. 2021 Feb;20(1):96-106. doi: 10.1002/wps.20823.
2
Assessing prolonged grief disorder: A systematic review of assessment instruments.评估持续性悲伤障碍:评估工具的系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Sep 1;274:420-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.049. Epub 2020 May 23.
3
How thinking hurts: Rumination, worry, and avoidance processes in adjustment to bereavement.思维如何伤人:哀悼调整过程中的反刍、担忧和回避。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jul;27(4):548-558. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2440. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
4
The prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in bereaved individuals following unnatural losses: Systematic review and meta regression analysis.非正常丧失后,丧亲个体中持续性悲伤障碍的流行率:系统评价和荟萃回归分析。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:146-156. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.034. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
The role of associative fear and avoidance learning in anxiety disorders: Gaps and directions for future research.关联恐惧和回避学习在焦虑障碍中的作用:未来研究的差距和方向。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 May;88:117-140. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.03.015. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
Prevalence of prolonged grief disorder in adult bereavement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.成人丧亲之痛中持续性悲伤障碍的患病率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Apr 1;212:138-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.01.030. Epub 2017 Jan 23.
7
Cognitive-behavioral variables mediate the impact of violent loss on post-loss psychopathology.认知-行为变量中介了暴力丧失对丧失后精神病理学的影响。
Psychol Trauma. 2015 Jul;7(4):382-90. doi: 10.1037/tra0000018. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
8
Anxious and depressive avoidance behavior in post-loss psychopathology: a longitudinal study.丧亲后精神病理学中的焦虑和抑郁回避行为:一项纵向研究。
Anxiety Stress Coping. 2015;28(5):587-600. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2015.1004054. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
9
Efficacy of an outpatient treatment for prolonged grief disorder: a randomized controlled clinical trial.门诊治疗创伤后应激障碍的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验。
J Affect Disord. 2014;167:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.05.035. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
10
Associations between prolonged grief disorder, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety in Rwandan genocide survivors.卢旺达种族灭绝幸存者中与持续性创伤后应激障碍、抑郁症、创伤后应激障碍和焦虑相关的关联。
Death Stud. 2012 Feb;36(2):97-117. doi: 10.1080/07481187.2011.573177.

《延长哀伤障碍中抑郁和焦虑回避问卷(DAAPGQ)德语版的心理测量特性》。

Psychometric properties of the German version of the Depressive and Anxious Avoidance in Prolonged Grief Questionnaire (DAAPGQ).

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 10;16(8):e0254959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254959. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0254959
PMID:34375341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8354469/
Abstract

The Depressive and Anxious Avoidance in Prolonged Grief Questionnaire (DAAPGQ) was developed to measure depressive and anxious avoidance behaviors, which, according to cognitive-behavioral models, are supposed to play an important role in the development and maintenance of prolonged grief. The present study aimed to develop a German version of the DAAPGQ and evaluate its psychometric properties and validity within a representative sample of the German general population (N = 2531). The German-language DAAPGQ was developed using a forward-backward translation procedure. Then, a subsample of individuals who reported having lost a significant other (N = 1371) of a representative sample was assessed with the German DAAPGQ, along with information on sociodemographic characteristics, prolonged grief symptom severity (PG-13), general anxiety (GAD-2) and depression (PHQ-2). The factor structure of the DAAPGQ was evaluated using confirmatory factor analyses, reliability by calculating internal consistency on subscale level and convergent validity by correlations between DAAPQG subscale sores with PG-13, GAD-2 and PHQ-2 sum scores. As expected, a two-factor model with correlated latent variables showed good fit to the data, replicating findings from the original version. Internal consistency was high for both subscales (Cronbach's α .86 and .95, respectively). Convergent validity was established by theoretically expected and statistically significant positive correlations of DAAPGQ subscales with symptom severity of prolonged grief, depression, and anxiety and negative correlations with time since loss. Furthermore, the addition of depressive and anxious avoidance significantly improved the prediction of prolonged grief symptom severity over sociodemographic and loss-related information. In sum, our results suggest that the German-language DAAPGQ is a reliable and valid measure of depressive and anxious avoidance and a useful tool to improve our knowledge on the role of avoidance in prolonged grief. We also provide descriptive data to improve the applicability of the DAAPGQ for individual diagnostics.

摘要

《延长哀伤障碍中抑郁和焦虑回避问卷》(DAAPGQ)旨在测量抑郁和焦虑回避行为,根据认知行为模型,这些行为被认为在延长哀伤的发展和维持中起着重要作用。本研究旨在开发《DAAPGQ》的德语版本,并在德国普通人群的代表性样本(N=2531)中评估其心理测量学特性和有效性。德语版《DAAPGQ》采用前后翻译程序开发。然后,在代表性样本中报告失去重要他人的个体的子样本(N=1371)中,使用德语《DAAPGQ》评估了个体,同时评估了社会人口学特征、延长哀伤症状严重程度(PG-13)、广泛性焦虑症(GAD-2)和抑郁症(PHQ-2)。使用验证性因子分析评估《DAAPGQ》的因子结构,通过亚量表水平的内部一致性计算信度,通过与 PG-13、GAD-2 和 PHQ-2 总分的相关来评估聚合效度。如预期的那样,具有相关潜在变量的两因素模型与数据拟合良好,复制了原始版本的发现。两个子量表的内部一致性都很高(Cronbach's α分别为.86 和.95)。DAAPGQ 子量表与延长哀伤、抑郁和焦虑症状严重程度的理论预期和统计学显著正相关,与损失后时间的负相关,建立了聚合效度。此外,抑郁和焦虑回避的增加显著提高了对延长哀伤症状严重程度的预测,超过了社会人口学和与损失相关的信息。总之,我们的结果表明,德语版《DAAPGQ》是一种可靠和有效的抑郁和焦虑回避测量工具,是提高我们对回避在延长哀伤中作用的认识的有用工具。我们还提供描述性数据,以提高《DAAPGQ》在个体诊断中的适用性。