• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无自主言语人群的照护者负担和代理报告结局:一项横断面调查研究。

Caregiver burden and proxy-reported outcomes of people without natural speech: a cross-sectional survey study.

机构信息

Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

Department of Health Services Research, Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e048789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048789.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048789
PMID:34404709
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8372882/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine interrelations between care-related burden on informal caregivers and their proxy assessments of outcomes in people without natural speech.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

Data were collected in January 2019 from a postal survey of informal caregivers of people without natural speech who are insured by a large regional health insurance company in the German federal state of Lower Saxony.

PARTICIPANTS

n=714 informal caregivers of people without natural speech of all ages and with various underlying disabilities were identified and contacted via the health insurance company. Data from n=165 informal caregivers (26.4%) were obtained.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Caregiver burden (self-reported, Burden Scale for Family Caregivers), pragmatic communication skills of people without natural speech (proxy report, self-developed), health-related quality of life of people without natural speech (proxy report, DISABKIDS Chronic Generic Measure - DCGM-12) and functioning of people without natural speech (proxy report, WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0).

RESULTS

The analyses revealed significant associations between caregiver burden on the one hand and both proxy-reported health-related quality of life (b=-0.422; p≤0.001) and functioning (b=0.521; p≤0.001) on the other. Adding caregiver burden to the regression model leads to a substantial increase in explained variance in functioning (R² Model 1=0.349; R² Model 2=0.575) as well as in health-related quality of life (R² Model 1=0.292; R² Model 2=0.460).

CONCLUSIONS

Caregiver burden should be considered an important determinant when informal caregivers report outcomes on behalf of people without natural speech. Longitudinal studies are recommended to better understand the burdens experienced by caregivers when supporting people without natural speech.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

DRKS00013628.

摘要

目的

考察非言语人群的照料者负担与其照料者对非言语人群结局的代理评估之间的相互关系。

设计

横断面调查。

地点

2019 年 1 月,在德国下萨克森州一家大型地区健康保险公司的参保人群中,通过邮寄问卷的方式,对所有年龄段、存在各种基础残疾的非言语人群的非正式照料者进行了数据收集。

参与者

通过健康保险公司,确定并联系了 714 名非言语人群的非正式照料者,其中有 165 名(26.4%)提供了数据。

主要结局指标

照料者负担(自我报告,家庭照料者负担量表)、非言语人群的实用沟通技能(代理报告,自行开发)、非言语人群的健康相关生活质量(代理报告,儿童残疾核心量表-12 项,DISABKIDS Chronic Generic Measure-12)和非言语人群的功能(代理报告,世界卫生组织残疾评估量表 2.0)。

结果

分析结果显示,照料者负担与代理报告的健康相关生活质量(b=-0.422;p≤0.001)和功能(b=0.521;p≤0.001)之间存在显著关联。将照料者负担纳入回归模型后,功能(模型 1 R²=0.349;模型 2 R²=0.575)和健康相关生活质量(模型 1 R²=0.292;模型 2 R²=0.460)的解释方差显著增加。

结论

当非正式照料者代表非言语人群报告结局时,照料者负担应被视为一个重要的决定因素。建议进行纵向研究,以更好地理解照料者在支持非言语人群时所承受的负担。

注册号

DRKS00013628。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b297/8372882/b6a00a100d2b/bmjopen-2021-048789f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b297/8372882/b6a00a100d2b/bmjopen-2021-048789f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b297/8372882/b6a00a100d2b/bmjopen-2021-048789f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Caregiver burden and proxy-reported outcomes of people without natural speech: a cross-sectional survey study.无自主言语人群的照护者负担和代理报告结局:一项横断面调查研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 17;11(8):e048789. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-048789.
2
Burden of informal caregivers of people without natural speech: a mixed-methods intervention study.无自然语言能力人群的非正式照护者负担:一项混合方法干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):1549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08824-3.
3
Caregiver burden and health-related quality of life: A study of  informal caregivers of older adults in Ghana.照顾者负担和与健康相关的生活质量:加纳老年患者非正式照顾者的研究。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2024 Feb 21;43(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s41043-024-00509-3.
4
Factors associated with caregiver burden among adult (19-64 years) informal caregivers - An analysis from Dutch Municipal Health Service data.与成年(19-64 岁)非正式照料者的 caregiver 负担相关的因素-来自荷兰市立卫生局数据的分析。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Sep;28(5):1578-1589. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12982. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
The association between positive-negative reactions of informal caregivers of people with dementia and health outcomes in eight European countries: a cross-sectional study.欧洲八个国家痴呆症患者非正式照料者的正负反应与健康结局之间的关联:一项横断面研究
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jun;71(6):1417-34. doi: 10.1111/jan.12528. Epub 2014 Sep 23.
6
Changes in caregiver burden and health-related quality of life of informal caregivers of older people with Dementia: evidence from the European RightTimePlaceCare prospective cohort study.痴呆症老年人非正式照料者的照料负担及健康相关生活质量变化:来自欧洲适时适地照料前瞻性队列研究的证据
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Jun;71(6):1378-91. doi: 10.1111/jan.12561. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
7
Positive and negative outcomes of informal caregiving at home and in institutionalised long-term care: a cross-sectional study.家庭及机构化长期护理中非正式照护的积极与消极结果:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Oct 10;17(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0620-3.
8
Extent of caregiver burden among informal caregivers of persons with severe mental disorders in rural South Africa.农村南非严重精神障碍患者非正规照护者的照护负担程度。
Rural Remote Health. 2023 Jun;23(2):7509. doi: 10.22605/RRH7509. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
9
Moderated mediation path analysis of Mexican traumatic brain injury patient social functioning, family functioning, and caregiver mental health.墨西哥创伤性脑损伤患者社会功能、家庭功能和照顾者心理健康的中介调节路径分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Feb;94(2):362-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.210. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
10
Informal caregiver burden and influencing factors in gynaecological oncology patients hospitalized for chemotherapy: a cross-sectional study.妇科肿瘤化疗住院患者非专业照护者负担及其影响因素的横断面研究。
J Int Med Res. 2020 Nov;48(11):300060520974927. doi: 10.1177/0300060520974927.

引用本文的文献

1
Process evaluation of a complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication care in Germany: a mixed methods study.德国辅助和替代沟通护理中一项复杂干预措施的过程评估:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 13;25(1):373. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12452-y.
2
Measuring the reliability of proxy respondents in behavioural assessments: an open question.代理应答者在行为评估中可靠性的衡量:一个开放性问题。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Oct;35(10):2173-2190. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02501-z. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
3
Burden of informal caregivers of people without natural speech: a mixed-methods intervention study.

本文引用的文献

1
Complex intervention in augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) care in Germany: a study protocol of an evaluation study with a controlled mixed-methods design.德国增强和替代沟通(AAC)护理中的复杂干预:一项基于对照混合方法设计的评估研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e029469. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029469.
2
Appraising the quality of tools used to record patient-reported outcomes in users of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC): a systematic review.评估用于记录增材和替代沟通(AAC)使用者的患者报告结局的工具的质量:系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Oct;28(10):2669-2683. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02228-3. Epub 2019 Jun 18.
3
无自然语言能力人群的非正式照护者负担:一项混合方法干预研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 19;22(1):1549. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08824-3.
4
"Finding Common Ground" - Impact of a Complex Intervention on Collaboration in Augmentative and Alternative Communication Care of People without Natural Speech.“寻求共识”——一项复杂干预措施对无自然语言者辅助和替代沟通护理中协作的影响
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2022 Oct 26;15:2431-2446. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S370510. eCollection 2022.
Communicative Competence for Individuals who require Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A New Definition for a New Era of Communication?
对需要辅助和替代沟通的个体的沟通能力:沟通新时代的新定义?
Augment Altern Commun. 2014 Mar;30(1):1-18. doi: 10.3109/07434618.2014.885080.
4
Comparing functioning in spinal cord injury and in chronic spinal pain with two ICF-based instruments: WHODAS 2.0 and the WHO minimal generic data set covering functioning and health.比较基于 ICF 的两种工具:WHODAS 2.0 和 WHO 基本通用数据集(涵盖功能和健康状况)在脊髓损伤和慢性脊髓疼痛中的功能表现。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jul;33(7):1241-1251. doi: 10.1177/0269215519839104. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
5
New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: State of the science and future research directions.新型和新兴的辅助沟通技术支持:满足复杂沟通需求儿童及其沟通伙伴的需求:科学现状和未来研究方向。
Augment Altern Commun. 2019 Mar;35(1):26-41. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2018.1557251. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Augmentative and Alternative Communication use: family and professionals' perceptions of facilitators and barriers.辅助和替代沟通的使用:家庭与专业人员对促进因素和障碍的看法
Codas. 2018 Jul 19;30(4):e20170138. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20162017138.
7
Caregiver burden and quality of life of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in India.印度肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者的照顾者负担与生活质量
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018 Nov;19(7-8):606-610. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2018.1482353. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
8
Family-centered Services for Children with ASD and Limited Speech: The Experiences of Parents and Speech-language Pathologists.以家庭为中心的自闭症儿童和言语受限服务:父母和言语治疗师的经验。
J Autism Dev Disord. 2018 Apr;48(4):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3241-y.
9
Designing interaction, voice, and inclusion in AAC research.设计 AAC 研究中的交互、语音和包容性。
Augment Altern Commun. 2017 Sep;33(3):139-148. doi: 10.1080/07434618.2017.1342690. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
10
Prevalence of people who could benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) in the UK: determining the need.英国可从辅助和替代沟通(AAC)中受益的人群比例:确定需求
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016 Nov;51(6):639-653. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12235. Epub 2016 Apr 26.