Halner Andreas, Beer Sally, Pullinger Richard, Bafadhel Mona, Russell Richard E K
Respiratory Medicine Unit, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 20;16(8):e0254425. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254425. eCollection 2021.
COPD and asthma exacerbations result in many emergency department admissions. Not all treatments are successful, often leading to hospital readmissions.
We sought to develop predictive models for exacerbation treatment outcome in a cohort of exacerbating asthma and COPD patients presenting to the emergency department.
Treatment failure was defined as the need for additional systemic corticosteroids (SCS) and/or antibiotics, hospital readmissison or death within 30 days of initial emergency department visit. We performed univariate analysis comparing characteristics of patients either given or not given SCS at exacerbation and of patients who succeeded versus failed treatment. Patient demographics, medications and exacerbation symptoms, physiology and biology were available. We developed multivariate random forest models to identify predictors of SCS prescription and for predicting treatment failure.
Data were available for 81 patients, 43 (53%) of whom failed treatment. 64 (79%) of patients were given SCS. A random forest model using presence of wheeze at exacerbation and blood eosinophil percentage predicted SCS prescription with area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.69. An 11 variable random forest model (which included medication, previous exacerbations, symptoms and quality of life scores) could predict treatment failure with AUC 0.81. A random forest model using just the two best predictors of treatment failure, namely, visual analogue scale for breathlessness and sputum purulence, predicted treatment failure with AUC 0.68.
Prediction of exacerbation treatment outcome can be achieved via supervised machine learning combining different predictors at exacerbation. Validation of our predictive models in separate, larger patient cohorts is required.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和哮喘急性加重导致许多患者需急诊入院治疗。并非所有治疗都能成功,常导致再次入院。
我们试图为到急诊科就诊的哮喘和COPD急性加重患者队列开发急性加重治疗结果的预测模型。
治疗失败定义为在首次急诊科就诊后30天内需要额外使用全身糖皮质激素(SCS)和/或抗生素、再次入院或死亡。我们进行了单因素分析,比较了急性加重时接受或未接受SCS治疗的患者以及治疗成功与失败患者的特征。可获取患者的人口统计学信息、用药情况、急性加重症状、生理学和生物学指标。我们开发了多变量随机森林模型,以确定SCS处方的预测因素并预测治疗失败情况。
有81例患者的数据,其中43例(53%)治疗失败。64例(79%)患者接受了SCS治疗。使用急性加重时哮鸣音的存在和血液嗜酸性粒细胞百分比的随机森林模型预测SCS处方,受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.69。一个包含11个变量的随机森林模型(包括用药情况、既往急性加重史、症状和生活质量评分)预测治疗失败的AUC为0.81。仅使用治疗失败的两个最佳预测因素,即呼吸困难视觉模拟量表和痰液脓性程度的随机森林模型预测治疗失败的AUC为0.68。
通过在急性加重时结合不同预测因素的监督机器学习可实现急性加重治疗结果的预测。需要在单独的、更大的患者队列中对我们的预测模型进行验证。