Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Nutrients. 2021 Aug 5;13(8):2703. doi: 10.3390/nu13082703.
Recent studies using data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) have used inconsistent approaches to identify and categorize beverages, especially those containing low-calorie sweeteners (LCS), also referred to as low-calorie sweetened beverages (LCSBs). Herein, we investigate the approaches used to identify and categorize LCSBs in recent analyses of NHANES data. We reviewed published studies examining LCS consumption in relation to dietary and health outcomes and extracted the methods used to categorize LCS as reported by the authors of each study. We then examined the extent to which these approaches reliably identified LCSBs using the Internet Archive Wayback Machine to examine beverage ingredients lists across three NHANES cycles (2011-2016). None of the four general strategies used appeared to include all LCSBs while also excluding all beverages that did not contain LCS. In some cases, the type of sweetener in the beverage consumed could not be clearly determined; we found 9, 16, and 18 of such "mixed" beverage identifiers in the periods 2011-2012, 2013-2014, and 2015-2016, respectively. Then, to illustrate how heterogeneity in beverage categorization may impact the outcomes of published analyses, we compared results of a previously published analysis with outcomes when "mixed" beverages were grouped either all as LCSBs or all as sugary beverages. Our results suggest that caution is warranted in design and interpretation of studies using NHANES data to examine dietary and health correlates of sweetened beverage intake.
最近利用国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)数据进行的研究采用了不一致的方法来识别和分类饮料,特别是那些含有低卡路里甜味剂(LCS)的饮料,也称为低卡路里甜味饮料(LCSB)。在此,我们研究了最近对 NHANES 数据进行分析时用于识别和分类 LCSB 的方法。我们审查了研究 LCS 消费与饮食和健康结果之间关系的已发表研究,并提取了每项研究作者报告的用于对 LCS 进行分类的方法。然后,我们使用 Internet Archive Wayback Machine 检查了三个 NHANES 周期(2011-2016 年)中饮料成分清单,以检查这些方法在多大程度上可靠地识别了 LCSB。四种通用策略中没有一种似乎既包括所有 LCSB,又排除所有不含 LCS 的饮料。在某些情况下,所消耗饮料中的甜味剂类型无法明确确定;我们在 2011-2012 年、2013-2014 年和 2015-2016 年期间分别发现了 9、16 和 18 种此类“混合”饮料标识符。然后,为了说明饮料分类的异质性如何可能影响已发表分析的结果,我们比较了之前发表的一项分析的结果,以及当“混合”饮料全部归类为 LCSB 或全部归类为含糖饮料时的结果。我们的结果表明,在使用 NHANES 数据设计和解释研究时,应谨慎对待,以检查含糖饮料摄入与饮食和健康的相关性。