Snyder Andrew D, Ma Liangsuo, Steinberg Joel L, Woisard Kyle, Moeller Frederick G
Institute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.
Department of Psychiatry, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, United States.
Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 11;15:636273. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.636273. eCollection 2021.
Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) is a method for analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and other functional neuroimaging data that provides information about directionality of connectivity between brain regions. A review of the neuropsychiatric fMRI DCM literature suggests that there may be a historical trend to under-report self-connectivity (within brain regions) compared to between brain region connectivity findings. These findings are an integral part of the neurologic model represented by DCM and serve an important neurobiological function in regulating excitatory and inhibitory activity between regions. We reviewed the literature on the topic as well as the past 13 years of available neuropsychiatric DCM literature to find an increasing (but still, perhaps, and inadequate) trend in reporting these results. The focus of this review is fMRI as the majority of published DCM studies utilized fMRI and the interpretation of the self-connectivity findings may vary across imaging methodologies. About 25% of articles published between 2007 and 2019 made any mention of self-connectivity findings. We recommend increased attention toward the inclusion and interpretation of self-connectivity findings in DCM analyses in the neuropsychiatric literature, particularly in forthcoming effective connectivity studies of substance use disorders.
动态因果模型(DCM)是一种用于分析功能磁共振成像(fMRI)及其他功能性神经成像数据的方法,它能提供有关脑区之间连接方向性的信息。对神经精神fMRI的DCM文献综述表明,与脑区之间的连接性研究结果相比,可能存在一种历史趋势,即对自连接性(脑区内)的报道不足。这些发现是DCM所代表的神经学模型的一个组成部分,在调节区域间的兴奋性和抑制性活动中发挥着重要的神经生物学功能。我们回顾了关于该主题的文献以及过去13年可用的神经精神DCM文献,发现报道这些结果的趋势在增加(但可能仍然不足)。本综述的重点是fMRI,因为大多数已发表的DCM研究都使用了fMRI,并且自连接性研究结果的解释可能因成像方法而异。2007年至2019年间发表的文章中约有25%提到了自连接性研究结果。我们建议在神经精神文献的DCM分析中,特别是在即将开展的物质使用障碍有效连接性研究中,更多地关注自连接性研究结果的纳入和解释。