School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, People's Republic of China.
School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum (East China), Qingdao, 266580, People's Republic of China.
Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt A):111990. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111990. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
Existing studies on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on carbon emissions are mainly based on inter-annual change rate of carbon emissions. This study provided a new way to investigate the impact of the pandemic on carbon emissions by calculating the difference between the pandemic-free carbon emissions and the actual carbon emissions in 2020 based on scenario analysis. In this work, derived from Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) method and Back Propagation Neural Network (BPNN) method, two combined ARIMA-BPNN and BPNN-ARIMA simulation approaches were developed to simulate the carbon emissions of China, India, U.S. and EU under the pandemic-free scenario. The average relative error of the simulation was about 1%, which could provide reliable simulation results. The scenario simulation of carbon emission reduction in the US and EU were almost the same as the inter-annual change rate of carbon emissions reported by the existing statistics. However, the scenario simulation of carbon emission reduction in China and India is 5% larger than the inter-annual change rate of carbon emissions reported by the existing statistics. In some sense, the impact of the pandemic on carbon emission reduction in developing countries might be underestimated. This work would provide new sight to more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the pandemic on carbon emissions.
现有的关于 COVID-19 大流行对碳排放影响的研究主要基于碳排放的年际变化率。本研究通过基于情景分析,根据无大流行时期的碳排放与 2020 年实际碳排放之间的差值,为研究大流行对碳排放的影响提供了一种新的方法。在这项工作中,基于自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)方法和反向传播神经网络(BPNN)方法,开发了两种组合的 ARIMA-BPNN 和 BPNN-ARIMA 模拟方法,以模拟无大流行情景下中国、印度、美国和欧盟的碳排放。模拟的平均相对误差约为 1%,可以提供可靠的模拟结果。美国和欧盟的碳减排情景模拟几乎与现有统计报告的碳排放年际变化率相同。然而,中国和印度的碳减排情景模拟比现有统计报告的碳排放年际变化率高出 5%。在某种意义上,大流行对发展中国家碳减排的影响可能被低估了。这项工作将为更全面地了解大流行对碳排放的影响提供新的视角。