Warley A R, Finnegan O C, Nicholson E M, Laszlo G
Respiratory Department, Bristol Royal Infirmary.
Br J Dis Chest. 1987 Oct;81(4):349-55. doi: 10.1016/0007-0971(87)90183-5.
A five-point dyspnoea scale (modified MRC questionnaire) and 12-minute walking test were used to compare the relationship between subjective assessment of dyspnoea and objective measurement of disability in patients with chronic airflow limitation, cardiac disease, and normal subjects. There was no overall difference in exercise performance between the cardiac and respiratory groups. There was a significant correlation between vital capacity and exercise performance, and the slope of the regression line was similar in the two groups. There was no correlation between vital capacity and exercise performance in the group of normal subjects. The five-point dyspnoea scale predicts similar levels of performance in the 12-minute walking test whether the dyspnoea is a result of cardiac or respiratory disease.
采用五点呼吸困难量表(改良MRC问卷)和12分钟步行试验,比较慢性气流受限患者、心脏病患者及正常受试者呼吸困难主观评估与残疾客观测量之间的关系。心脏组和呼吸组的运动表现总体无差异。肺活量与运动表现之间存在显著相关性,两组回归线的斜率相似。正常受试者组中肺活量与运动表现之间无相关性。无论呼吸困难是由心脏疾病还是呼吸疾病引起,五点呼吸困难量表在12分钟步行试验中预测的表现水平相似。