• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《用于神经交流障碍患者的失语症和构音障碍筛查测试(STAD):日本的一项大规模、多中心验证研究》

The Screening Test for Aphasia and Dysarthria (STAD) for Patients with Neurological Communicative Disorders: A Large-Scale, Multicenter Validation Study in Japan.

机构信息

Research Center for Child Mental Development, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Rehabilitation, Mitsuwadai General Hospital, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(3):195-208. doi: 10.1159/000519381. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1159/000519381
PMID:34510047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9216311/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Evaluation of multiple domains, such as language, articulation, and cognitive function, is frequently required in neurological communicative disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of a 10-min screening scale for estimating aphasia, dysarthria, and cognitive dysfunction using a multicenter, large-sized consecutive series.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter validation study that included 314 patients with brain injury between February 1 and June 31, 2018, from 20 medical centers across Japan. The Screening Test for Aphasia and Dysarthria (STAD) was developed in Japan in 2009, and a previous smaller-scale retrospective study established its high to moderate validity. All patients had undergone the STAD, and 212 of them underwent the Western Aphasia Battery or Assessment of Motor Speech for Dysarthria. The effect size on all 29 items and receiver operating curves of 3 sections of the STAD were analyzed based on external criteria, which were decided considering the clinical diagnosis of aphasia, dysarthria, and cognitive dysfunction. Correlations between the STAD and reference tests were calculated.

RESULTS

The phi coefficients of 23 out of 29 items exceeded the moderate effect size of 0.3 toward the targeted disorder. Overall, there was a good balance between sensitivity (82-92%) and specificity (77-78%), with moderate to large positive and negative likelihood ratios (3.7-4.19 and 0.1-0.23). The Pearson's r between the verbal section and Western Aphasia Battery Aphasia Quotient, the articulation section and Assessment of Motor Speech for Dysarthria, and the nonverbal section and Western Aphasia Battery Nonlinguistic Skills were 0.89, 0.70, and 0.79, respectively.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the STAD has acceptable content and concurrent validity for the assessment of communicative function in patients with brain injury. This short screening tool can be useful in specific contexts, such as in early bedside investigations, to obtain a quick summary of communicative function prior to the administration of other tests, and in cases where more in-depth testing is not feasible.

摘要

简介

在神经交流障碍中,经常需要评估多个领域,如语言、发音和认知功能。本研究的目的是通过多中心、大样本连续系列研究,探讨使用 10 分钟筛查量表评估失语症、构音障碍和认知功能障碍的性能。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心验证研究,纳入了 2018 年 2 月 1 日至 6 月 31 日来自日本 20 个医学中心的 314 名脑损伤患者。筛查失语症和构音障碍测试(STAD)于 2009 年在日本开发,之前的小规模回顾性研究已经证实其具有较高到中度的有效性。所有患者均接受了 STAD 测试,其中 212 名患者接受了西方失语症成套测验或构音障碍评估的运动言语测试。根据外部标准分析了 29 项测试中的所有 29 项和 3 个部分的接收者操作曲线的效应大小,这些标准是根据失语症、构音障碍和认知功能障碍的临床诊断来决定的。计算了 STAD 与参考测试之间的相关性。

结果

29 项测试中有 23 项的 phi 系数超过了 0.3 的中度效应大小,针对目标障碍。总的来说,敏感性(82-92%)和特异性(77-78%)之间存在良好的平衡,具有中等至大的阳性和阴性似然比(3.7-4.19 和 0.1-0.23)。言语部分与西方失语症成套测验失语症商数、发音部分与构音障碍评估的运动言语测试以及非言语部分与西方失语症成套测验非言语技能之间的 Pearson r 分别为 0.89、0.70 和 0.79。

结论

我们证明 STAD 对脑损伤患者的交流功能评估具有可接受的内容和同时效度。这种简短的筛查工具在特定情况下可能很有用,例如在早期床边检查中,在进行其他测试之前快速总结交流功能,以及在无法进行更深入测试的情况下。

相似文献

1
The Screening Test for Aphasia and Dysarthria (STAD) for Patients with Neurological Communicative Disorders: A Large-Scale, Multicenter Validation Study in Japan.《用于神经交流障碍患者的失语症和构音障碍筛查测试(STAD):日本的一项大规模、多中心验证研究》
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2022;74(3):195-208. doi: 10.1159/000519381. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
2
Occurrence of communication and swallowing problems in neurological disorders: analysis of forty patients.神经系统疾病中沟通和吞咽问题的发生情况:40例患者分析
NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35(4):719-27. doi: 10.3233/NRE-141165.
3
Prospective Investigation of Incidence and Co-Occurrence of Dysphagia, Dysarthria, and Aphasia Following Ischemic Stroke.前瞻性调查缺血性脑卒中后吞咽困难、构音障碍和失语症的发生率及共病情况。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 Feb 21;28(1):188-194. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0136.
4
Verbal impairment after closed head injury. Report of a replication study.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1984 Aug;172(8):475-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198408000-00006.
5
MRI-Based Neuroanatomical Predictors of Dysphagia, Dysarthria, and Aphasia in Patients with First Acute Ischemic Stroke
.首次急性缺血性脑卒中患者吞咽困难、构音障碍和失语症的基于MRI的神经解剖学预测指标
Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;7(1):21-34. doi: 10.1159/000457810. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
Communication outcome after stroke: a new measure of the carer's perspective.中风后的沟通结果:照顾者视角的一项新指标。
Clin Rehabil. 2009 Sep;23(9):846-56. doi: 10.1177/0269215509336055. Epub 2009 May 29.
7
Measuring verbal and non-verbal communication in aphasia: reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change of the Scenario Test.失语症言语和非言语交流的测量:情景测试的可靠性、有效性和变化敏感性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010 Jul-Aug;45(4):424-35. doi: 10.3109/13682820903111952.
8
Validating the Communicative Participation Item Bank (CPIB) for use with people with aphasia: an analysis of Differential Item Function (DIF).验证失语症患者使用的沟通参与项目库(CPIB):差异项目功能(DIF)分析。
Aphasiology. 2017;31(8):861-878. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2016.1225274. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
9
Validation of a new language screening tool for patients with acute stroke: the Language Screening Test (LAST).验证一种用于急性脑卒中患者的新语言筛查工具:语言筛查测试(LAST)。
Stroke. 2011 May;42(5):1224-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.609503. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
10
[Speech changes in dementia].[痴呆症中的言语变化]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1990 Jun;58(6):215-23. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001185.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.失语症评估工具的质量:一项系统综述。
Brain Sci. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):271. doi: 10.3390/brainsci15030271.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment Model to Identify Patients With Stroke With a High Possibility of Discharge to Home: A Retrospective Cohort Study.评估模型识别有较高出院回家可能性的脑卒中患者:一项回顾性队列研究。
Stroke. 2017 Oct;48(10):2812-2818. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018075. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: a systematic review.中风患者失语症的筛查测试:一项系统综述。
J Neurol. 2017 Feb;264(2):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
3
Optimal timing of speech and language therapy for aphasia after stroke: more evidence needed.中风后失语症言语和语言治疗的最佳时机:仍需更多证据。
Expert Rev Neurother. 2015;15(8):885-93. doi: 10.1586/14737175.2015.1058161. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
A case for the implementation of cognitive-communication screenings in acute stroke.在急性脑卒中患者中实施认知-沟通筛查的案例。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;23(1):4-14. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2013/11-0064).
5
The ScreeLing: occurrence of linguistic deficits in acute aphasia post-stroke.急性卒中后失语症中的语言缺陷:ScreeLing 现象。
J Rehabil Med. 2012 May;44(5):429-35. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0955.
6
Validation of the language component of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination--Revised (ACE-R) as a screening tool for aphasia in stroke patients.剑桥认知功能检查表修订版(ACE-R)语言部分作为中风患者失语症筛查工具的效度验证。
Australas J Ageing. 2011 Sep;30(3):156-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-6612.2010.00466.x. Epub 2011 Jan 30.
7
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves.pROC:一个用于 R 和 S+的开源软件包,用于分析和比较 ROC 曲线。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 Mar 17;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-77.
8
A behavioral analysis of degree of reinforcement and ease of shifting to new responses in a Weigl-type card-sorting problem.对韦格尔型卡片分类问题中强化程度和转向新反应难易程度的行为分析。
J Exp Psychol. 1948 Aug;38(4):404-11. doi: 10.1037/h0059831.
9
A standardization study of the Czech version of the Mississippi Aphasia Screening Test (MASTcz) in stroke patients and control subjects.捷克语版密西西比失语症筛查测试(MASTcz)在中风患者和对照受试者中的标准化研究。
Brain Inj. 2008 Sep;22(10):793-801. doi: 10.1080/02699050802372190.
10
Initial validity and reliability of the SCCAN: using tailored testing to assess adult cognition and communication.SCCAN的初始效度和信度:采用定制测试评估成人的认知与沟通能力
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008 Feb;51(1):49-69. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/004).