• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伤害患者的医疗保健利用和健康相关生活质量:教育群体比较。

Health care utilization and health-related quality of life of injury patients: comparison of educational groups.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, P.O. Box 2040, CA, Rotterdam, 3000, The Netherlands.

Association of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 19;21(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06913-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-021-06913-3
PMID:34538243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8451142/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences in health care utilization by educational level can contribute to inequalities in health. Understanding health care utilization and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of educational groups may provide important insights into the presence of these inequalities. Therefore, we assessed characteristics, health care utilization and HRQoL of injury patients by educational level.

METHOD

Data for this registry based cohort study were extracted from the Dutch Injury Surveillance System. At 6-month follow-up, a stratified sample of patients (≥25 years) with an unintentional injury reported their health care utilization since discharge and completed the EQ-5-Dimension, 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). Logistic regression analyses, adjusting for patient and injury characteristics, were performed to investigate the association between educational level and health care utilization. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse HRQoL scores by educational level, for hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients.

RESULTS

This study included 2606 patients; 47.9% had a low, 24.4% a middle level, and 27.7% a high level of education. Patients with low education were more often female, were older, had more comorbidities, and lived more often alone compared to patients with high education (p < 0.001). Patients with high education were more likely to visit a general practitioner (OR: 1.38; CI: 1.11-1.72) but less likely to be hospitalized (OR: 0.79; CI: 0.63-1.00) and to have nursing care at home (OR: 0.66; CI: 0.49-0.90) compared to their low educated counterparts. For both hospitalized an non-hospitalized persons, those with low educational level reported lower HRQoL and more problems on all dimensions than those with a higher educational level.

CONCLUSION

Post-discharge, level of education was associated with visiting the general practitioner and nursing care at home, but not significantly with use of other health care services in the 6 months post-injury. Additionally, patients with a low educational level had a poorer HRQoL. However, other factors including age and sex may also explain a part of these differences between educational groups. It is important that patients are aware of potential consequences of their trauma and when and why they should consult a specific health care service after ED or hospital discharge.

摘要

背景

不同教育程度的医疗保健利用差异可能导致健康不平等。了解教育群体的医疗保健利用和与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)可以为这些不平等的存在提供重要的见解。因此,我们评估了不同教育程度的伤害患者的特征、医疗保健利用和 HRQoL。

方法

本基于登记的队列研究的数据从荷兰伤害监测系统中提取。在 6 个月的随访中,对出院后有非故意损伤的年龄≥25 岁的患者进行分层抽样,报告其出院后医疗保健利用情况,并完成 EQ-5D 维度、5 级(EQ-5D-5L)和视觉模拟量表(EQ VAS)。对患者和损伤特征进行调整的逻辑回归分析用于调查教育水平与医疗保健利用之间的关系。对住院和非住院患者按教育水平进行 HRQoL 评分的描述性统计分析。

结果

本研究纳入了 2606 名患者;47.9%的患者受教育程度较低,24.4%的患者受教育程度中等,27.7%的患者受教育程度较高。与受教育程度较高的患者相比,受教育程度较低的患者女性更多,年龄更大,合并症更多,独居的比例更高(p<0.001)。受教育程度较高的患者更有可能去看全科医生(OR:1.38;CI:1.11-1.72),但更不可能住院(OR:0.79;CI:0.63-1.00)和接受家庭护理(OR:0.66;CI:0.49-0.90),与受教育程度较低的患者相比。对于住院和非住院患者,受教育程度较低的患者在所有维度上的 HRQoL 均较低,问题也较多。

结论

出院后,教育水平与全科医生就诊和家庭护理有关,但与受伤后 6 个月内其他医疗保健服务的使用无显著相关性。此外,教育程度较低的患者 HRQoL 较差。然而,其他因素,包括年龄和性别,也可能解释教育群体之间的部分差异。重要的是,患者应意识到他们的创伤可能带来的潜在后果,以及何时以及为何应在 ED 或出院后咨询特定的医疗保健服务。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4443/8451142/574e08cb1bc7/12913_2021_6913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4443/8451142/25640a6374a4/12913_2021_6913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4443/8451142/574e08cb1bc7/12913_2021_6913_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4443/8451142/25640a6374a4/12913_2021_6913_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4443/8451142/574e08cb1bc7/12913_2021_6913_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health care utilization and health-related quality of life of injury patients: comparison of educational groups.伤害患者的医疗保健利用和健康相关生活质量:教育群体比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 19;21(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06913-3.
2
Association between in-hospital frailty and health-related quality of life after stroke: the Nor-COAST study.住院衰弱与卒中后健康相关生活质量的关联:Nor-COAST 研究。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02128-5.
3
Anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress symptoms among injury patients and the association with outcome after injury.创伤患者的焦虑、抑郁和创伤后应激症状及其与创伤后结局的关系。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jan 28;13(1):2023422. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.2023422. eCollection 2022.
4
Post-discharge quality of life of COVID-19 patients at 1-month follow-up: A cross-sectional study in the largest tertiary care hospital of Bangladesh.新冠肺炎患者出院后 1 个月随访时的生活质量:孟加拉国最大的三级保健医院的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 31;18(1):e0280882. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280882. eCollection 2023.
5
Investigating the effects of frailty on six-month outcomes in older trauma patients admitted to UK major trauma centres: a multi-centre follow up study.调查衰弱对英国大型创伤中心老年创伤患者 6 个月结局的影响:一项多中心随访研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 4;32(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13049-023-01169-8.
6
Quality of life profile of general Vietnamese population using EQ-5D-5L.使用EQ-5D-5L量表对越南普通人群生活质量的描述
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 11;15(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0771-0.
7
Health-related quality of life measured using the EQ-5D-5L: South Australian population norms.使用EQ-5D-5L量表测量的健康相关生活质量:南澳大利亚州人群常模。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Sep 20;14(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0537-0.
8
Agreement between retrospectively assessed health-related quality of life collected 1 week and 12 months post-injury: an observational follow-up study.回顾性评估伤后 1 周和 12 个月健康相关生活质量的一致性:一项观察性随访研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 23;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1139-4.
9
Influence of psychiatric co-morbidity on health-related quality of life among major trauma patients.精神共病对重大创伤患者健康相关生活质量的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023 Apr;49(2):965-971. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02114-7. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
10
Health-related quality of life of long-term patients receiving opioid agonist therapy: a nested prospective cohort study in Norway.长期接受阿片类激动剂治疗患者的健康相关生活质量:挪威嵌套前瞻性队列研究。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2020 Sep 3;15(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s13011-020-00309-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Status of Information and Communication Technologies Utilization, Education Needs, Mobile Health Literacy, and Self-Care Education Needs of a Population of Stroke Patients.脑卒中患者群体对信息通信技术的使用现状、教育需求、移动健康素养及自我护理教育需求
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 May 19;13(10):1183. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13101183.
2
Educational level and gender are associated with emotional well-being in a cohort of Dutch dialysis patients.教育水平和性别与荷兰透析患者队列的情绪健康有关。
BMC Nephrol. 2024 May 22;25(1):179. doi: 10.1186/s12882-024-03617-8.
3
Examining Health-Seeking Behavior among Diverse Ethnic Subgroups within Black Populations in the United States and Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Health status and psychological outcomes after trauma: A prospective multicenter cohort study.创伤后健康状况和心理结局:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 21;15(4):e0231649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231649. eCollection 2020.
2
Multimorbidity, healthcare utilization and socioeconomic status: A register-based study in Denmark.多病共存、医疗保健利用与社会经济地位:丹麦基于登记的研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 1;14(8):e0214183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214183. eCollection 2019.
3
Defining health and health inequalities.定义健康和健康不平等。
探究美国和加拿大的黑人族群中不同少数民族群体的寻医行为:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Mar 19;21(3):368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030368.
4
Long-term health outcomes of Q-fever fatigue syndrome patients.Q 热疲劳综合征患者的长期健康结局。
Epidemiol Infect. 2023 Sep 19;151:e179. doi: 10.1017/S0950268823001401.
Public Health. 2019 Jul;172:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
Socioeconomic inequities in health services' utilization following the Health Transformation Plan initiative in Iran.伊朗卫生转型计划倡议实施后卫生服务利用的社会经济不平等。
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Dec 1;33(10):1065-1072. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy096.
5
The relationship between socioeconomic status and trauma outcomes.社会经济地位与创伤结局的关系。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2018 Dec 1;40(4):e431-e439. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdy033.
6
The role of pre-existing comorbidity on the rate of recovery following injury: A longitudinal cohort study.既往合并症对损伤后恢复速度的影响:一项纵向队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0193019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193019. eCollection 2018.
7
Exploring the differences in general practitioner and health care specialist utilization according to education, occupation, income and social networks across Europe: findings from the European social survey (2014) special module on the social determinants of health.探索欧洲各地根据教育程度、职业、收入和社会网络划分的全科医生和医疗保健专家使用情况的差异:来自欧洲社会调查(2014年)健康社会决定因素特别模块的研究结果。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Feb 1;27(suppl_1):73-81. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw255.
8
Individual and Regional Determinants for Physical Therapy Utilization in Germany: Multilevel Analysis of National Survey Data.德国物理治疗利用的个体和区域决定因素:全国调查数据的多层次分析
Phys Ther. 2017 May 1;97(5):512-523. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzx022.
9
The effect of socio-economic status on non-fatal outcome after injury: A systematic review.社会经济地位对受伤后非致命性结局的影响:一项系统综述。
Injury. 2017 Mar;48(3):578-590. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.01.013. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
10
Dutch Tariff for the Five-Level Version of EQ-5D.EQ-5D五级版本的荷兰关税。
Value Health. 2016 Jun;19(4):343-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Mar 30.