Conservation Medicine, National Marine Mammal Foundation, San Diego, California, United States.
Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States.
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2021 Nov 17;24(8):355-394. doi: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1975182. Epub 2021 Sep 19.
In the wake of the (DWH) oil spill, a number of government agencies, academic institutions, consultants, and nonprofit organizations conducted lab- and field-based research to understand the toxic effects of the oil. Lab testing was performed with a variety of fish, birds, turtles, and vertebrate cell lines (as well as invertebrates); field biologists conducted observations on fish, birds, turtles, and marine mammals; and epidemiologists carried out observational studies in humans. Eight years after the spill, scientists and resource managers held a workshop to summarize the similarities and differences in the effects of DWH oil on vertebrate taxa and to identify remaining gaps in our understanding of oil toxicity in wildlife and humans, building upon the cross-taxonomic synthesis initiated during the Natural Resource Damage Assessment. Across the studies, consistency was found in the types of toxic response observed in the different organisms. Impairment of stress responses and adrenal gland function, cardiotoxicity, immune system dysfunction, disruption of blood cells and their function, effects on locomotion, and oxidative damage were observed across taxa. This consistency suggests conservation in the mechanisms of action and disease pathogenesis. From a toxicological perspective, a logical progression of impacts was noted: from molecular and cellular effects that manifest as organ dysfunction, to systemic effects that compromise fitness, growth, reproductive potential, and survival. From a clinical perspective, adverse health effects from DWH oil spill exposure formed a suite of signs/symptomatic responses that at the highest doses/concentrations resulted in multi-organ system failure.
在(DWH)溢油事件之后,许多政府机构、学术机构、顾问和非营利组织进行了实验室和现场研究,以了解石油的毒性影响。实验室测试使用了各种鱼类、鸟类、海龟和脊椎动物细胞系(以及无脊椎动物);野外生物学家对鱼类、鸟类、海龟和海洋哺乳动物进行了观察;流行病学家在人类中进行了观察性研究。溢油事件发生八年后,科学家和资源管理者举行了一次研讨会,总结了 DWH 溢油对脊椎动物类群的影响的相似性和差异,并确定了我们对野生动物和人类石油毒性的理解中仍然存在的差距,这是在自然资源损害评估期间启动的跨分类群综合研究的基础上进行的。在所有研究中,在不同生物体中观察到的毒性反应类型都具有一致性。在不同生物中观察到了应激反应和肾上腺功能障碍、心脏毒性、免疫系统功能障碍、血细胞及其功能紊乱、运动能力受损和氧化损伤等毒性反应。这种一致性表明作用机制和疾病发病机制具有保守性。从毒理学角度来看,注意到了影响的逻辑进展:从表现为器官功能障碍的分子和细胞效应,到影响适应能力、生长、生殖潜力和生存的全身效应。从临床角度来看,DWH 溢油暴露的不良健康影响形成了一系列的体征/症状反应,在最高剂量/浓度下导致多器官系统衰竭。