Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Statistics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Biometrics. 2023 Mar;79(1):462-474. doi: 10.1111/biom.13569. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
An important goal of environmental health research is to assess the risk posed by mixtures of environmental exposures. Two popular classes of models for mixtures analyses are response-surface methods and exposure-index methods. Response-surface methods estimate high-dimensional surfaces and are thus highly flexible but difficult to interpret. In contrast, exposure-index methods decompose coefficients from a linear model into an overall mixture effect and individual index weights; these models yield easily interpretable effect estimates and efficient inferences when model assumptions hold, but, like most parsimonious models, incur bias when these assumptions do not hold. In this paper, we propose a Bayesian multiple index model framework that combines the strengths of each, allowing for non-linear and non-additive relationships between exposure indices and a health outcome, while reducing the dimensionality of the exposure vector and estimating index weights with variable selection. This framework contains response-surface and exposure-index models as special cases, thereby unifying the two analysis strategies. This unification increases the range of models possible for analysing environmental mixtures and health, allowing one to select an appropriate analysis from a spectrum of models varying in flexibility and interpretability. In an analysis of the association between telomere length and 18 organic pollutants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), the proposed approach fits the data as well as more complex response-surface methods and yields more interpretable results.
环境健康研究的一个重要目标是评估环境暴露混合物所带来的风险。混合物分析的两种流行模型类别是曲面响应方法和暴露指数方法。曲面响应方法估计高维曲面,因此非常灵活,但难以解释。相比之下,暴露指数方法将线性模型的系数分解为总体混合物效应和个别指数权重;当模型假设成立时,这些模型可产生易于解释的效应估计值和有效的推断,但与大多数简约模型一样,当这些假设不成立时,会产生偏差。在本文中,我们提出了一个贝叶斯多指数模型框架,该框架结合了两者的优势,允许暴露指数与健康结果之间存在非线性和非加性关系,同时降低暴露向量的维度,并通过变量选择估计指数权重。该框架包含曲面响应和暴露指数模型作为特例,从而统一了这两种分析策略。这种统一增加了分析环境混合物和健康的可能模型范围,允许从一个灵活度和可解释性不同的模型范围中选择合适的分析。在一项关于端粒长度与国家健康和营养调查(NHANES)中 18 种有机污染物之间关联的分析中,所提出的方法与更复杂的曲面响应方法一样拟合数据,并产生更易于解释的结果。