Hurth Alban, Nijzink-Ter Steege Jessica, Scheepbouwer Pauline, Roose Eva, Lahousse Astrid, Leysen Laurence, Stas Lara, Kregel Jeroen, Salvat Eric, Nijs Jo
Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1050 Brussel, Belgium.
Institut de Formation en Masso-Kinésithérapie de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, 67000 Strasbourg, France.
Clin Pract. 2021 Sep 7;11(3):607-618. doi: 10.3390/clinpract11030076.
The Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) measurement properties in patients having nonspecific, noncancer pain are well-established. However, studies examining the reliability and validity of either the CSI or the Central Sensitization Inventory short-form version (CSI-9) in breast cancer survivors (BCS) are scarce. The purpose was to evaluate convergent validity and internal consistency of the CSI and CSI-9. Additionally, the relevance of a new cluster calculator using the CSI was explored. The cross-sectional multi-center study included 65 BCS and 37 healthy volunteers. Patients filled out multiple questionnaires assessing pain, number of painful areas, anxiety, depression and quality of life. The relevance of a cluster calculator was explored by known-group comparisons and boxplot description. All hypotheses were formulated before data analysis. The majority of hypotheses on the correlations between the CSI or CSI-9 and other health outcomes were confirmed (22 out of 27). The CSI and CSI-9 have excellent (α = 0.92) and good (α = 0.86) internal consistency, respectively. The CSI cluster calculator might be an interesting tool to use to have a patient's overall condition snapshot. Generally, the study findings support the construct validity and internal consistency of the CSI, which underline the use of this self-reported instrument in BCS. The CSI-9 shows promising results, but should be further evaluated.
中央敏化量表(CSI)在患有非特异性、非癌性疼痛患者中的测量属性已得到充分确立。然而,关于CSI或中央敏化量表简版(CSI - 9)在乳腺癌幸存者(BCS)中的信度和效度的研究却很匮乏。本研究旨在评估CSI和CSI - 9的收敛效度和内部一致性。此外,还探讨了使用CSI的新聚类计算器的相关性。这项横断面多中心研究纳入了65名BCS患者和37名健康志愿者。患者填写了多份问卷,评估疼痛、疼痛部位数量、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量。通过已知组比较和箱线图描述来探讨聚类计算器的相关性。所有假设均在数据分析前制定。关于CSI或CSI - 9与其他健康结局之间相关性的大多数假设得到了证实(27个假设中有22个)。CSI和CSI - 9分别具有出色的(α = 0.92)和良好的(α = 0.86)内部一致性。CSI聚类计算器可能是一个用于获取患者整体状况快照的有趣工具。总体而言,研究结果支持CSI的结构效度和内部一致性,这突出了在BCS中使用这种自我报告工具的价值。CSI - 9显示出有前景的结果,但仍需进一步评估。