• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Limitations of self-inflating resuscitators.

作者信息

Finer N N, Barrington K J, Al-Fadley F, Peters K L

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1986 Mar;77(3):417-20.

PMID:3456554
Abstract

In an effort to characterize the performance of self-inflating resuscitators, three examples of three models were subjected to laboratory testing: the Ohio Hope II resuscitator (Ohio Medical Products, Madison, WI), the PMR-2 resuscitator (Puritan Medical Products, Lenexa, KS), and the Laerdal resuscitator (AS Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway). The devices were connected to a test lung and compressed at frequencies of from 10 to 60 and at greater than 60 breaths per minute at 5, 10, and 15 L/min of flow. These devices were used with and without a reservoir and were compressed at less than and more than the pop-off valve pressures. The results revealed that all devices equipped with reservoirs delivered a significantly higher oxygen concentration than those without (P less than .001), and that activation of the pop-off valve significantly reduced Fio2 under all conditions (P less than .005). The pop-off valves for each device were activated throughout a wide range of pressures, the Laerdal 41 to 72 cm H2O, PMR-2 51 to 97 cm H2O, and the Ohio Hope II 38 to 106 cm H2O, well in excess of the manufacturer's specifications. Only the Laerdal with reservoir was able to deliver an Fio2 of greater than 0.9 when compressed at more than the pop-off valve pressure at rates of up to 30 breaths per minute using flows of 10 L/min, and it was the only device to produce Fio2 values of greater than 0.9 at all rates to 60 breaths per minute when compressed at less than the pop-off valve pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

相似文献

1
Limitations of self-inflating resuscitators.
Pediatrics. 1986 Mar;77(3):417-20.
2
Laerdal infant resuscitators are unreliable as free-flow oxygen delivery devices.
Am J Perinatol. 1997 Jul;14(6):347-51. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994158.
3
A strategy to optimise the performance of the mouth-to-bag resuscitator using small tidal volumes: effects on lung and gastric ventilation in a bench model of an unprotected airway.一种使用小潮气量优化口对口复苏器性能的策略:对未保护气道实验台模型中肺通气和胃通气的影响
Resuscitation. 2004 Apr;61(1):69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.12.012.
4
An evaluation of the resistance to flow through the patient valves of twelve adult manual resuscitators.对十二款成人手动复苏器的病人阀的流动阻力进行评估。
Respir Care. 1992 May;37(5):432-8.
5
A comparison of three neonatal resuscitation devices.三种新生儿复苏设备的比较。
Resuscitation. 2005 Oct;67(1):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.02.016.
6
The self-inflating resuscitation bag delivers high oxygen concentrations when used without a reservoir: implications for neonatal resuscitation.自膨式复苏气囊在不使用贮氧器的情况下可输送高浓度氧气:对新生儿复苏的影响。
Respir Care. 2009 Dec;54(12):1665-70.
7
Oxygen delivery using neonatal self-inflating resuscitation bags without a reservoir.使用无储氧袋的新生儿自动充气复苏袋供氧。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010 Sep;95(5):F315-9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.166462. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
8
1980 assessment of eight adult manual resuscitators.1980年对八款成人手动复苏器的评估。
Respir Care. 1980 Nov;25(11):1136-42.
9
Evaluation of ten manual resuscitators across an operational temperature range of -18 degrees C to 50 degrees C.在-18摄氏度至50摄氏度的工作温度范围内对十种手动复苏器进行评估。
Respir Care. 1991 Mar;36(3):161-72.
10
Artificial ventilation during transport: A randomized crossover study of manual resuscitators with comparison to mechanical ventilators in a simulation model.转运期间的人工通气:在模拟模型中对人工复苏器与机械通气机进行比较的随机交叉研究。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2018 Sep;28(9):788-794. doi: 10.1111/pan.13389.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of Amflow®, a Real-Time-Portable Feedback Device for Delivering Appropriate Ventilation in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomised, Controlled, Cross-Over Simulation Study.用于为重症患者提供适当通气的实时便携式反馈设备Amflow®的疗效:一项随机、对照、交叉模拟研究。
Emerg Med Int. 2020 Apr 24;2020:5296519. doi: 10.1155/2020/5296519. eCollection 2020.
2
Newborn self-inflating manual resuscitators: precision robotic testing of safety and reliability.新生儿自动充气式手动复苏器:安全性和可靠性的精密机器人测试。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Jul;104(4):F403-F408. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-315391. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
3
Comparison of efficacy of three devices of manual positive pressure ventilation: a mannequin-based study.
三种手动正压通气设备的疗效比较:一项基于人体模型的研究。
Ital J Pediatr. 2015 Mar 31;41:25. doi: 10.1186/s13052-015-0131-9.
4
Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of preterm infants receiving positive pressure ventilation in the delivery room.产房内接受正压通气的早产儿的短期和中期结局
Crit Care Res Pract. 2013;2013:715915. doi: 10.1155/2013/715915. Epub 2013 Jan 17.
5
Pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.儿科基础生命支持:2010年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南
Pediatrics. 2010 Nov;126(5):e1345-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2972C. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
6
Part 13: pediatric basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第13部分:儿科基础生命支持:2010年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S862-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.971085.
7
Comparison of three manual ventilation devices using an intubated mannequin.使用插管人体模型对三种手动通气设备进行比较。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 Nov;89(6):F490-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.047712.
8
The effect of a manometer on the mean airway pressure during hand ventilation, an in vitro study.
Eur J Pediatr. 1989 Apr;148(6):574-6. doi: 10.1007/BF00441562.
9
Endotracheal resuscitation of neonates using a rebreathing bag.使用再呼吸袋对新生儿进行气管内复苏。
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Jan;66(1 Spec No):39-42. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.1_spec_no.39.