Mota-Rojas Daniel, Braghieri Ada, Álvarez-Macías Adolfo, Serrapica Francesco, Ramírez-Bribiesca Efrén, Cruz-Monterrosa Rosy, Masucci Felicia, Mora-Medina Patricia, Napolitano Fabio
Neurophysiology, Behavior and Animal Welfare Assessment, DPAA, Campus Xochimilco, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, México City 04960, Mexico.
Scuola di Scienze Agrarie, Forestali, Alimentari ed Ambientali, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, 85100 Potenza, PZ, Italy.
Animals (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;11(9):2683. doi: 10.3390/ani11092683.
This study discusses scientific findings on the use of draught animals such as equids (i.e., horses, mules, and donkeys) and bovids (i.e., cattle and water buffaloes) in rural labours. Relevant peer-reviewed literature published between 1980 and 2021 was retrieved from CAB Abstracts, PubMed, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Scopus databases. Although animals were used to produce draught power since their domestication and are still being used for this purpose, mechanisation has markedly reduced animal labour demand in agriculture. However, the process was uneven across continents according to economic constraints, and draught animals are currently concentrated in small production units located on terrains that do not favour agriculture mechanisation in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Generally, equids can work at rates similar to those of bovids or faster but can sustain the work for shorter periods of time. In addition, buffaloes possess tough hooves and resistance to disease that make them suitable for working in wetlands and clay soils. Draught animals allow a marked reduction of both GHG emissions and non-renewable energy consumption as compared with agricultural machinery. In addition, they may allow obtaining profits from otherwise non-usable lands. Therefore, their use should be promoted in rural areas where low investments are usually the only ones feasible, and the energy of the animals can be obtained at a low cost by feeding them harvest residues and by-products. However, more attention should be paid to the quality of human-animal interactions-due to the close contact between animals and humans while working-and to the welfare of draught animals when transported and slaughtered-due to the high prevalence of injuries they suffer when subjected to these practices.
本研究探讨了在农村劳动中使用役畜(如马科动物,即马、骡和驴)和牛科动物(即牛和水牛)的科学发现。从CAB文摘数据库、PubMed、ISI科学网和Scopus数据库中检索了1980年至2021年间发表的相关同行评审文献。尽管自动物被驯化以来就被用于产生牵引力,并且目前仍在用于此目的,但机械化已显著减少了农业对畜力的需求。然而,根据经济限制,这一过程在各大洲并不均衡,目前役畜集中在非洲、拉丁美洲和亚洲不利于农业机械化的地形上的小型生产单位。一般来说,马科动物的工作速度与牛科动物相似或更快,但能持续工作的时间较短。此外,水牛蹄子坚硬且抗病,使其适合在湿地和粘土中工作。与农业机械相比,役畜可显著减少温室气体排放和不可再生能源消耗。此外,它们还可以从原本无法利用的土地上获取利润。因此,在通常只有低投资可行且通过用收获残余物和副产品喂养动物就能低成本获取动物能量的农村地区,应推广役畜的使用。然而,由于工作时动物与人类密切接触,应更加关注人畜互动的质量,并且由于运输和屠宰时役畜受伤的发生率很高,应更加关注役畜在运输和屠宰时的福利。