Department of Sports Science, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, 67663 Kaiserslautern, Germany.
Institute of Physical Therapy, Prevention and Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55122 Mainz, Germany.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 21;21(18):6323. doi: 10.3390/s21186323.
Clinical classification models are mostly pathology-dependent and, thus, are only able to detect pathologies they have been trained for. Research is needed regarding pathology-independent classifiers and their interpretation. Hence, our aim is to develop a pathology-independent classifier that provides prediction probabilities and explanations of the classification decisions. Spinal posture data of healthy subjects and various pathologies (back pain, spinal fusion, osteoarthritis), as well as synthetic data, were used for modeling. A one-class support vector machine was used as a pathology-independent classifier. The outputs were transformed into a probability distribution according to Platt's method. Interpretation was performed using the explainable artificial intelligence tool Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations. The results were compared with those obtained by commonly used binary classification approaches. The best classification results were obtained for subjects with a spinal fusion. Subjects with back pain were especially challenging to distinguish from the healthy reference group. The proposed method proved useful for the interpretation of the predictions. No clear inferiority of the proposed approach compared to commonly used binary classifiers was demonstrated. The application of dynamic spinal data seems important for future works. The proposed approach could be useful to provide an objective orientation and to individually adapt and monitor therapy measures pre- and post-operatively.
临床分类模型大多依赖于病理学,因此只能检测到它们经过训练的病理学。需要研究与病理学无关的分类器及其解释。因此,我们的目标是开发一种与病理学无关的分类器,提供预测概率和分类决策的解释。使用健康受试者和各种病理学(背痛、脊柱融合、骨关节炎)以及合成数据的脊柱姿势数据进行建模。使用单类支持向量机作为与病理学无关的分类器。根据 Platt 方法将输出转换为概率分布。使用可解释人工智能工具 Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations 进行解释。将结果与常用的二进制分类方法进行比较。对于脊柱融合的受试者,获得了最佳的分类结果。与健康参考组相比,背痛患者尤其难以区分。该方法对于预测的解释证明是有用的。与常用的二进制分类器相比,没有明显的劣势。动态脊柱数据的应用对于未来的工作似乎很重要。该方法可以提供客观的方向,并在术前和术后个体化地调整和监测治疗措施。