ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco-Cardiovascular Surgery Department, 20100 Milano, Italy.
Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Cliniche L. Sacco, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20100 Milano, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Aug 30;57(9):909. doi: 10.3390/medicina57090909.
: Aortic arch disease is still a high-risk surgical challenge despite major advances both in surgical and anesthesiological management. A combined surgical and endovascular approach has been proposed for aortic arch disease treatment to avoid hypothermia and circulatory arrest in high-risk patients. : Between June 2004 and June 2021, 112 patients were referred to our department for aortic arch surgery; 38 (33.9%) patients underwent supra-aortic debranching and endovascular treatment. Of these, 21 (55%) patients underwent type I aortic arch hybrid debranching procedure and in 17 (45%) patients a type II aortic arch hybrid debranching procedure was performed. None of the patients were emergent. : No intra-operative deaths were recorded. In the type I aortic arch hybrid debranching patients' group, one patient died at home waiting the endovascular step, one developed ascending aortic dissection and another one developed a pseudoaneurysm at the site of the debranching at follow-up. In the type II aortic arch hybrid debranching patients' group, left carotid artery branch closure was detected at follow-up in one patient. Thirty day/in-hospital rates of adverse neurological events for both the surgical and endovascular procedures were 3% for minor stroke, with no permanent neurological deficit and 0% for permanent paraplegia/paraparesis. In 100% of the cases, the endovascular step succeeded and the type Ia endoleak rate was 0%. : Hybrid arch surgery is a valuable option for aortic arch aneurysm treatment in patients with high surgical risk. The choice of aortic arch debranching between type I or type II is crucial and depends on anatomic and clinical patient characteristics. Further larger scale studies are needed to better define the advantages of these techniques.
尽管在外科和麻醉管理方面都取得了重大进展,但主动脉弓疾病仍然是一项高风险的手术挑战。已经提出了一种联合外科和血管内方法来治疗主动脉弓疾病,以避免高危患者出现低温和循环停止。
在 2004 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,有 112 名患者因主动脉弓手术被转至我们科室;其中 38 名(33.9%)患者接受了主动脉弓去分支和血管内治疗。其中 21 名(55%)患者接受了 I 型主动脉弓杂交去分支手术,17 名(45%)患者接受了 II 型主动脉弓杂交去分支手术。所有患者均非急诊手术。
无术中死亡记录。在 I 型主动脉弓杂交去分支患者组中,1 例患者在家中等待血管内治疗时死亡,1 例患者发生升主动脉夹层,1 例患者在随访时发生去分支部位假性动脉瘤。在 II 型主动脉弓杂交去分支患者组中,1 例患者在随访时发现左侧颈动脉分支闭塞。手术和血管内两种方法的 30 天/住院期间不良神经事件发生率均为 3%(轻度中风),无永久性神经功能缺损,0%(永久性截瘫/截瘫)。在所有病例中,血管内治疗均成功,Ia 型内漏率为 0%。
杂交弓手术是治疗高危主动脉弓动脉瘤患者的一种有价值的选择。I 型或 II 型主动脉弓去分支的选择至关重要,取决于解剖和临床患者特征。需要进一步开展更大规模的研究,以更好地确定这些技术的优势。