Department of Internal Medicine, Mulago National Referral Hospital, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University Lung Institute, Kampala, Uganda.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 29;11(1):19346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98770-7.
The study aim was to determine the association of a one United States dollar (USD) dollar incentive and tuberculosis (TB) treatment outcomes among people with TB receiving treatment at a rural hospital in Uganda under programmatic settings. We conducted a quasi-experiment in which people with TB were randomised (1:1 ratio) to receive either a one USD incentive at months 0, 2, 5 and 6 (Dollar arm) or routine care (Routine arm). A second control group (Retrospective controls) consisted of participants who had a treatment outcome in the preceding 6 months. Treatment outcomes were compared between the intervention and control groups using Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. The association between the incentive and treatment outcomes was determined using Poisson regression analysis with robust variances. Between November 2018 and October 2019, we enrolled 180 participants (60 in the Dollar arm and 120 in the Control group). TB cure (33.3% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.068) and treatment success (70.0% vs. 59.2% p = 0.156) were higher in the Dollar arm than the Control group, while loss-to-follow-up was lower in the Dollar arm (10.0% vs. 20.8% p = 0.070). Participants in the Dollar arm were more likely to be cured (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR): 1.59, 95% CI 1.04-2.44, p = 0.032) and less likely to be lost to follow-up (aIRR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.20-0.96, p = 0.040). A one-dollar incentive was associated with higher TB cure and lower loss-to-follow-up among people with TB in rural Uganda.
本研究旨在探讨在乌干达农村医院接受治疗的结核患者中,给予 1 美元激励与结核治疗结局之间的关系。我们进行了一项准实验,将结核患者随机分为两组(1:1 比例),分别在第 0、2、5 和 6 个月给予 1 美元激励(美元组)或常规护理(常规组)。第二个对照组(回顾性对照组)由前 6 个月有治疗结局的参与者组成。采用 Pearson 卡方检验和 Fisher 确切检验比较干预组和对照组之间的治疗结局。采用泊松回归分析和稳健方差确定激励与治疗结局之间的关系。在 2018 年 11 月至 2019 年 10 月期间,我们共纳入 180 名参与者(美元组 60 名,对照组 120 名)。与对照组相比,美元组结核治愈率(33.3% vs. 20.8%,p=0.068)和治疗成功率(70.0% vs. 59.2%,p=0.156)更高,而失访率更低(10.0% vs. 20.8%,p=0.070)。美元组参与者更有可能治愈(校正发病率比(aIRR):1.59,95%CI 1.04-2.44,p=0.032),也更不可能失访(aIRR:0.44,95%CI 0.20-0.96,p=0.040)。在乌干达农村地区,给予结核患者 1 美元激励与结核治愈率提高和失访率降低有关。