Cirad, UMR 17, Intertryp, Montpellier, France.
Laveran Military Teaching Hospital, Marseille, France; IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France; Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, AP-HM, SSA, Vitrome, Marseille, France.
Environ Res. 2022 Mar;204(Pt B):112141. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.112141. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
The origin of SARS-CoV-2 is still the subject of a controversial debate. The natural origin theory is confronted to the laboratory leak theory. The latter is composite and comprises contradictory theories, one being the leak of a naturally occurring virus and the other the leak of a genetically engineered virus. The laboratory leak theory is essentially based on a publication by Rahalkar and Bahulikar in 2020 linking SARS-CoV-2 to the Mojiang mine incident in 2012 during which six miners fell sick and three died. We analyzed the clinical reports. The diagnosis is not that of COVID-19 or SARS. SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the Mojiang mine. We also bring arguments against the laboratory leak narrative.
SARS-CoV-2 的起源仍然是一个有争议的话题。自然起源理论与实验室泄漏理论相对立。后者是复杂的，包含相互矛盾的理论，一种是自然发生的病毒泄漏，另一种是基因工程病毒的泄漏。实验室泄漏理论主要基于 Rahalkar 和 Bahulikar 于 2020 年发表的一篇文章，该文章将 SARS-CoV-2 与 2012 年莫疆矿事件联系起来，当时有六名矿工生病，其中三人死亡。我们分析了临床报告。诊断不是 COVID-19 或 SARS。莫疆矿中没有 SARS-CoV-2。我们也提出了反对实验室泄漏说法的论点。
