Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Risk Anal. 2022 Jul;42(7):1571-1584. doi: 10.1111/risa.13835. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
Understanding is still developing about spatial risk factors for COVID-19 infection or mortality. This is a secondary analysis of patient records in a confined area of eastern England, covering persons who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 through end May 2020, including dates of death and residence area. We obtained residence area data on air quality, deprivation levels, care home bed capacity, age distribution, rurality, access to employment centers, and population density. We considered these covariates as risk factors for excess cases and excess deaths in the 28 days after confirmation of positive Covid status relative to the overall case load and death recorded for the study area as a whole. We used the conditional autoregressive Besag-York-Mollie model to investigate the spatial dependency of cases and deaths allowing for a Poisson error structure. Structural equation models were applied to clarify relationships between predictors and outcomes. Excess case counts or excess deaths were both predicted by the percentage of population age 65 years, care home bed capacity and less rurality: older population and more urban areas saw excess cases. Greater deprivation did not correlate with excess case counts but was significantly linked to higher mortality rates after infection. Neither excess cases nor excess deaths were predicted by population density, travel time to local employment centers, or air quality indicators. Only 66% of mortality was explained by locally high case counts. Higher deprivation clearly linked to higher COVID-19 mortality separate from wider community prevalence and other spatial risk factors.
关于 COVID-19 感染或死亡的空间风险因素,人们的理解仍在发展之中。这是对英格兰东部一个封闭地区患者记录的二次分析,涵盖了 2020 年 5 月底通过 SARS-CoV-2 检测呈阳性的人员,包括死亡日期和居住区域。我们获得了空气质量、贫困水平、养老院床位容量、年龄分布、农村程度、就业中心可达性以及人口密度等居住区域数据。我们将这些协变量视为与整个研究区域的总体病例数和死亡记录相比,阳性 Covid 状态确认后 28 天内病例和死亡过多的风险因素。我们使用条件自回归 Besag-York-Mollie 模型来调查病例和死亡的空间相关性,同时允许泊松误差结构。结构方程模型用于阐明预测因子与结果之间的关系。通过人口中 65 岁以上人群的比例、养老院床位容量和农村程度较低来预测超额病例数或超额死亡人数:老年人口和更多的城市地区出现了超额病例。更大的贫困程度与超额病例数无关,但与感染后的死亡率显著相关。人口密度、前往当地就业中心的旅行时间或空气质量指标均不能预测超额病例数或超额死亡人数。只有 66%的死亡率可以用当地高病例数来解释。除了更广泛的社区流行率和其他空间风险因素外,较高的贫困程度显然与更高的 COVID-19 死亡率相关。