CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, People's Republic of China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, People's Republic of China.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200300. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0300. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
Gossip, or sharing information about absent others, has been identified as an effective solution to free rider problems in situations with conflicting interests. Yet, the information transmitted via gossip can be biased, because gossipers may send dishonest information about others for personal gains. Such dishonest gossip makes reputation-based cooperation more difficult to evolve. But when are people likely to share honest or dishonest gossip? We build formal models to provide the theoretical foundation for individuals' gossip strategies, taking into account the gossiper's fitness interdependence with the receiver and the target. Our models across four different games suggest a very simple rule: when there is a perfect match (mismatch) between fitness interdependence and the effect of honest gossip, the gossiper should always be honest (dishonest); however, in the case of a partial match, the gossiper should make a choice based on their fitness interdependence with the receiver and the target and the marginal cost/benefit in terms of pay-off differences caused by possible choices of the receiver and the target in the game. Moreover, gossipers can use this simple rule to make optimal decisions even under noise. We discuss empirical examples that support the predictions of our model and potential extensions. This article is part of the theme issue 'The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling'.
八卦,即分享关于不在场的他人的信息,已被确定为解决利益冲突情况下搭便车问题的有效方法。然而,通过八卦传递的信息可能存在偏差,因为八卦者可能会为了个人利益而发送关于他人的不诚实信息。这种不诚实的八卦使得基于声誉的合作更难发展。但是,人们什么时候更有可能分享诚实或不诚实的八卦呢?我们构建了正式模型,为个人的八卦策略提供了理论基础,同时考虑了八卦者与接收者和目标之间的适应度相互依存关系。我们在四个不同的博弈中建立的模型表明了一个非常简单的规则:当适应度相互依存关系与诚实八卦的效果完全匹配(不匹配)时,八卦者应该始终诚实(不诚实);然而,在部分匹配的情况下,八卦者应该根据他们与接收者和目标的适应度以及接收者和目标在博弈中可能选择所带来的收益差异的边际成本/收益做出选择。此外,八卦者可以使用这个简单的规则来做出最佳决策,即使在存在噪音的情况下。我们讨论了支持我们模型预测的实证例子以及潜在的扩展。本文是主题为“合作的语言:声誉和诚实信号”的一部分。