Department of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
National Laboratory for Digital and Material Technology of Stomatology, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing, 100081, People's Republic of China.
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Oct 4;21(1):492. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01818-3.
To evaluate the clinical outcome and changes in posterior buccal soft tissue following implant restoration in groups with and without a free gingival graft (FGG) before implant placement.
Twenty-six individuals who required implant restoration and displayed lack of keratinized mucosa (KM) were recruited and assigned to the FGG group (with FGG before implant placement) or Control group (without FGG before implant placement) randomly. A screw-retained conventional implant restoration was performed for each patient. Peri-implant soft tissue was captured by an intraoral scanner and analyzed by an image processing software. Clinical parameters (plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and bleeding on probing) were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Buccal soft tissue changes (mucosal margin, soft tissue thickness, and width of keratinized mucosa) on the buccal side of implant site were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni test were used to analyze significant difference between groups at each time point (α = 0.05).
The clinical parameters were lower in the FGG group than that in the Control group, although there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). Peri-implant soft tissue collapsed and the changes (mucosal margin and soft tissue thickness) were significantly greater in the Control group than the FGG group (P < 0.05). Width of KM was larger in the FGG group than the Control group, although there was no significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Minimal peri-implant soft tissue changes occurred in two groups. Performing FGG before implant placement is a viable procedure to maintain peri-implant soft tissue but might not affect peri-implant health during 12 months follow-up. However, small sample size must be considered. Trial registration This study was retrospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (Registration number: ChiCTR2000037954; Date of registration: 6 September 2020).
评估在种植体植入前有无游离龈移植(FGG)的两组患者在种植体修复后,颊侧后部软组织的临床效果和变化。
招募了 26 名需要植入物修复且角化黏膜(KM)不足的患者,并随机分为 FGG 组(种植体植入前有 FGG)或对照组(种植体植入前无 FGG)。每位患者均进行了螺钉固位常规种植体修复。通过口腔内扫描仪采集种植体周围软组织,并使用图像处理软件进行分析。在基线和 1、3、6、12 个月时评估牙周软组织的临床参数(菌斑指数、牙龈指数、探诊深度和探诊出血)。在 1、3、6 和 12 个月时评估种植体颊侧的颊侧软组织变化(黏膜边缘、软组织厚度和角化黏膜宽度)。使用双向方差分析和 Bonferroni 检验分析各时间点两组之间的差异(α=0.05)。
FGG 组的临床参数低于对照组,但两组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。对照组的种植体周围软组织萎缩,变化(黏膜边缘和软组织厚度)明显大于 FGG 组(P<0.05)。FGG 组的角化黏膜宽度大于对照组,但两组之间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
两组的种植体周围软组织变化较小。种植体植入前进行 FGG 是维持种植体周围软组织的可行方法,但在 12 个月的随访期间,可能不会影响种植体周围的健康。然而,必须考虑到样本量较小的问题。
本研究在中国临床试验注册中心(注册号:ChiCTR2000037954;注册日期:2020 年 9 月 6 日)进行了回顾性注册。