• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症姑息治疗环境中协作的交互和组织决定因素的定性探讨:来自家庭成员、医疗保健专业人员和关键知情人的观点。

A qualitative exploration of interactional and organizational determinants of collaboration in cancer palliative care settings: Family members', health care professionals' and key informants' perspectives.

机构信息

Person-centered Healthcare & Health Communication, Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland.

Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Canton of Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Oct 6;16(10):e0256965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256965. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0256965
PMID:34613982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8494323/
Abstract

As life expectancy has increased, a growing number of people experience conditions, including cancers, that carry complex health and social needs. Palliative care services have the potential to address these needs but face significant obstacles. One major obstacle is suboptimal interprofessional collaboration. This study's goal was an in-depth exploration of interactional and organizational barriers and supports of collaboration in palliative care in Switzerland. We sought the perspectives of health care professionals, patients' family members and leaders and experts in oncology/palliative care delivery (key informants) through interviews and focus groups with fifty HPs and key informants and ten patients' family members. Qualitative analyses of interviews and focus groups used framework analysis. We identified three major themes of interaction: personal characteristics, communication, and connectedness with other health care professionals; and three major organizational themes: service characteristics, standardized communication and processes, and service coordination and promotion. Based on our findings, we recommend that health care professionals consider strategies to increase their collaboration and communication skills and opportunities to interact. We advocate the implementation of methods for coordinating services, standardization of consultation/referral procedures and communication between health care professionals, and the promotion of underutilized services to foster successful, sustainable collaboration.

摘要

随着预期寿命的延长,越来越多的人经历各种疾病,包括癌症,这些疾病需要复杂的医疗和社会需求。姑息治疗服务有潜力满足这些需求,但面临着重大障碍。一个主要障碍是专业间协作不佳。本研究的目的是深入探讨瑞士姑息治疗中协作的互动和组织障碍及支持因素。我们通过访谈和焦点小组,从医疗保健专业人员、患者家属和肿瘤学/姑息治疗服务提供方面的领导和专家(关键知情人)那里,寻求他们的观点。对访谈和焦点小组的定性分析采用了框架分析。我们确定了三个主要的互动主题:个人特征、沟通和与其他医疗保健专业人员的联系;以及三个主要的组织主题:服务特征、标准化沟通和流程以及服务协调和推广。基于我们的发现,我们建议医疗保健专业人员考虑增加协作和沟通技巧的策略,以及增加互动的机会。我们主张实施协调服务、规范咨询/转介程序以及促进医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通的方法,并推广利用不足的服务,以促进成功、可持续的协作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f22a/8494323/ca4f2a01b032/pone.0256965.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f22a/8494323/bd6ab64bf0fa/pone.0256965.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f22a/8494323/ca4f2a01b032/pone.0256965.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f22a/8494323/bd6ab64bf0fa/pone.0256965.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f22a/8494323/ca4f2a01b032/pone.0256965.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A qualitative exploration of interactional and organizational determinants of collaboration in cancer palliative care settings: Family members', health care professionals' and key informants' perspectives.癌症姑息治疗环境中协作的交互和组织决定因素的定性探讨:来自家庭成员、医疗保健专业人员和关键知情人的观点。
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 6;16(10):e0256965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256965. eCollection 2021.
2
Exploring Chiropractic Services in the Canadian Forces Health Services - Perceptions of Facilitators and Barriers Among Key Informants.探索加拿大军队医疗服务中的整脊疗法——关键信息提供者对促进因素和障碍的看法。
Mil Med. 2019 May 1;184(5-6):e344-e351. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy319.
3
Supportive and palliative care in people with cirrhosis: International systematic review of the perspective of patients, family members and health professionals.肝硬化患者的支持性和姑息治疗:患者、家属和卫生专业人员视角的国际系统评价。
J Hepatol. 2018 Dec;69(6):1260-1273. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.028. Epub 2018 Sep 20.
4
Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: a systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families.姑息治疗在肿瘤学和血液肿瘤学中的应用:从医疗保健专业人员、成年患者及其家属的角度来看认知障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 13;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00556-7.
5
Perspectives on Volunteer-Professional Collaboration in Palliative Care: A Qualitative Study Among Volunteers, Patients, Family Carers, and Health Care Professionals.志愿者与专业人员在姑息治疗中的合作视角:志愿者、患者、家属照顾者和卫生保健专业人员的定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Aug;58(2):198-207.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
6
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
7
Patients' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration between health care professionals during hospitalization: a qualitative systematic review.患者对住院期间医护专业人员跨专业协作的看法:一项定性系统评价
JBI Evid Synth. 2020 Jun;18(6):1208-1270. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00121.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Family members' perceptions of inpatient palliative care consult services: a qualitative study.家庭成员对住院姑息治疗咨询服务的看法:一项定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jan;28(1):42-8. doi: 10.1177/0269216313491620. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
10
Understanding the distinct experience of rural interprofessional collaboration in developing palliative care programs.了解农村跨专业合作在制定姑息治疗计划方面的独特经验。
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(2):2711. Epub 2014 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis.综合姑息治疗与肿瘤学:一项实在论综合分析
BMC Med. 2025 May 9;23(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04083-1.
2
Empowering nurses to provide palliative care for COPD patients in a pulmonary department: participatory action research.在肺部疾病科室增强护士为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者提供姑息治疗的能力:参与式行动研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Apr 21;24(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01743-0.
3
"It is not the fault of the health care team - it is the way the system works": a mixed-methods quality improvement study of patients with advanced cancer and family members reveals challenges navigating a fragmented healthcare system and the administrative and financial burdens of care.

本文引用的文献

1
Palliative care utilization in oncology and hemato-oncology: a systematic review of cognitive barriers and facilitators from the perspective of healthcare professionals, adult patients, and their families.姑息治疗在肿瘤学和血液肿瘤学中的应用:从医疗保健专业人员、成年患者及其家属的角度来看认知障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
BMC Palliat Care. 2020 Apr 13;19(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12904-020-00556-7.
2
Collaboration in Health Care.医疗保健中的合作。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2017 Jun;48(2):207-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.071. Epub 2017 May 31.
3
Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Inpatient Palliative Care Consultations: A Qualitative Analysis of Interviews With Palliative Care and Nonpalliative Care Providers.
“这不是医疗团队的错——而是系统的运作方式”:一项针对晚期癌症患者及其家属的混合方法质量改进研究揭示了在零碎的医疗体系中所面临的挑战,以及医疗照护的行政和经济负担。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 11;24(1):1378. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11744-z.
有效住院姑息治疗会诊的障碍与促进因素:对姑息治疗和非姑息治疗提供者访谈的定性分析
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;36(3):191-199. doi: 10.1177/1049909118793635. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
4
Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries: projections with a Bayesian model ensemble.35个工业化国家的未来预期寿命:基于贝叶斯模型集成的预测
Lancet. 2017 Apr 1;389(10076):1323-1335. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32381-9. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
5
The Appropriate Provision of Primary versus Specialist Palliative Care to Cancer Patients: Oncologists' Perspectives.为癌症患者提供适当的初级与专科姑息治疗:肿瘤学家的观点
J Palliat Med. 2017 Apr;20(4):395-403. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0399. Epub 2016 Dec 20.
6
Integrating palliative care into the trajectory of cancer care.将姑息治疗融入癌症治疗过程。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Mar;13(3):159-71. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.201. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
7
The Growth of Palliative Care in U.S. Hospitals: A Status Report.美国医院姑息治疗的发展:一份现状报告。
J Palliat Med. 2016 Jan;19(1):8-15. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2015.0351. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
8
Early identification of palliative care needs by family physicians: A qualitative study of barriers and facilitators from the perspective of family physicians, community nurses, and patients.家庭医生对姑息治疗需求的早期识别:一项从家庭医生、社区护士和患者角度对障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2014 Jun;28(6):480-490. doi: 10.1177/0269216314522318.
9
Oncologist factors that influence referrals to subspecialty palliative care clinics.影响转介至亚专科姑息治疗诊所的肿瘤学家因素。
J Oncol Pract. 2014 Mar;10(2):e37-44. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001130. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
10
Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.运用多学科健康研究中定性数据分析的框架方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Sep 18;13:117. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-117.