• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心源性休克的护理系统

Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.

作者信息

Alvarez Villela Miguel, Clark Rachel, William Preethi, Sims Daniel B, Jorde Ulrich P

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

Division of Cardiology, Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 16;8:712594. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.712594. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.712594
PMID:34616782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8489379/
Abstract

Outcomes for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients remain relatively poor despite significant advancements in primary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and temporary circulatory support (TCS) technologies. Mortality from CS shows great disparities that seem to reflect large variations in access to care and physician practice patterns. Recent reports of different models to standardize care in CS have shown considerable potential at improving outcomes. The creation of regional, integrated, 3-tiered systems, would facilitate standardized interventions and equitable access to care. Multidisciplinary CS teams at Level I centers would direct care in a hub-and-spoke model through jointly developed protocols and real-time shared decision making. Levels II and III centers would provide early access to life-saving therapies and safe transfer to designated hub centers. In regions with large geographical distances, the implementation of telemedicine-cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) care can be an important resource for the creation of effective systems of care.

摘要

尽管在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和临时循环支持(TCS)技术方面取得了重大进展,但心源性休克(CS)患者的预后仍然相对较差。CS导致的死亡率存在很大差异,这似乎反映了在获得医疗服务和医生实践模式方面的巨大差异。最近关于CS标准化护理不同模式的报告显示,在改善预后方面具有相当大的潜力。创建区域一体化的三级系统将有助于标准化干预措施并公平获得医疗服务。一级中心的多学科CS团队将通过联合制定的方案和实时共享决策,以中心辐射模式指导护理。二级和三级中心将提供早期获得救生治疗的机会,并安全转诊至指定的中心枢纽。在地理距离较大的地区,实施远程医疗心脏重症监护病房(CICU)护理可以成为创建有效护理系统的重要资源。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee9/8489379/9ee95366b87f/fcvm-08-712594-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee9/8489379/da37a42c7040/fcvm-08-712594-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee9/8489379/9ee95366b87f/fcvm-08-712594-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee9/8489379/da37a42c7040/fcvm-08-712594-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cee9/8489379/9ee95366b87f/fcvm-08-712594-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Systems of Care in Cardiogenic Shock.心源性休克的护理系统
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 16;8:712594. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.712594. eCollection 2021.
2
Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock in Cardiac ICUs With Versus Without Shock Teams.心外 ICU 中是否设置休克团队对心源性休克的管理和预后的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Sep 28;78(13):1309-1317. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.07.044.
3
Cardiogenic shock teams and centres: a contemporary review of multidisciplinary care for cardiogenic shock.心源性休克治疗团队与中心:心源性休克多学科护理的当代综述
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):988-998. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13180. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Mechanical Circulatory Support in Cardiogenic Shock: Shock Team or Bust?机械循环支持在心源性休克中的应用:休克团队还是破产?
Can J Cardiol. 2020 Feb;36(2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Nov 9.
5
Impact of hospital transfer to hubs on outcomes of cardiogenic shock in the real world.现实世界中,医院转诊至中心对心源性休克结局的影响。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Nov;23(11):1927-1937. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2263. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
6
Influence of Timing and Predicted Risk on Mortality in Impella-Treated Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock Patients.时机和预测风险对接受Impella治疗的心肌梗死相关心源性休克患者死亡率的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2020 May 14;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00074. eCollection 2020.
7
Initial outcomes of a multidisciplinary network for the care of patients with cardiogenic shock.多学科网络治疗心原性休克患者的初步结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;74(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 21.
8
Review of Advancements in Managing Cardiogenic Shock: From Emergency Care Protocols to Long-Term Therapeutic Strategies.心源性休克管理进展综述:从急救方案到长期治疗策略
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 16;13(16):4841. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164841.
9
Standardized Team-Based Care for Cardiogenic Shock.标准化的以团队为基础的心源性休克治疗方案。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 9;73(13):1659-1669. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.084.
10
Regional Variation in the Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock in the United States.美国伴心原性休克的急性心肌梗死的治疗和结局的地域差异。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Feb;13(2):e006661. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006661. Epub 2020 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with regional differences in healthcare quality for patients with acute myocardial infarction in Japan.日本急性心肌梗死患者医疗质量地区差异的相关因素。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319179. eCollection 2025.
2
From Spoke to Hub: The "Golden Hours" in Cardiogenic Shock.从辐条到轮毂:心源性休克中的“黄金时间”
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Feb 18;14(4):e039100. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.039100. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
3
Timing and treatment strategies according to SCAI classification in cardiogenic shock.

本文引用的文献

1
Phenotyping Cardiogenic Shock.心原性休克表型。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jul 20;10(14):e020085. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020085. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
2
Use of Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Among Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock.急性心肌梗死合并心源性休克患者使用机械循环支持装置的情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2037748. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.37748.
3
Outcomes of Hospitalizations for Cardiogenic Shock at Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Non-Left Ventricular Assist Device Centers.
心源性休克中根据SCAI分类的时机和治疗策略
Eur Heart J Suppl. 2023 Dec 13;25(Suppl I):I19-I23. doi: 10.1093/eurheartjsupp/suad129. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and microaxial left ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock: Choosing the right mechanical circulatory support to improve outcomes.体外膜肺氧合与微轴左心室辅助装置治疗心源性休克:选择合适的机械循环支持以改善预后。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 16;13:200-213. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2022.12.011. eCollection 2023 Mar.
左心室辅助装置与非左心室辅助装置中心的心源性休克住院治疗结局。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Dec;9(23):e017326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017326. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
4
Cardiogenic Shock Management: International Survey of Contemporary Practices.心原性休克管理:当代实践的国际调查。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2020 Oct;32(10):371-374. doi: 10.25270/jic/20.00066.
5
Cardiogenic Shock Clinical Presentation, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Acute Cardiac Care Unit of a Tertiary Hospital: Does Gender Play a Role?三级医院急性心脏监护病房收治患者的心源性休克临床表现、管理及院内结局:性别起作用吗?
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 27;9(10):3117. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103117.
6
Sex Disparities in the Management and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction in the Young.年轻患者因急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的管理和结局中的性别差异。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Oct;13(10):e007154. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007154. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
7
Invasive Hemodynamic Assessment and Classification of In-Hospital Mortality Risk Among Patients With Cardiogenic Shock.对心源性休克患者进行有创血流动力学评估和院内死亡率风险分类。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Sep;13(9):e007099. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007099. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
8
Multidisciplinary Code Shock Team in Cardiogenic Shock: A Canadian Centre Experience.心源性休克的多学科代码休克团队:加拿大一个中心的经验。
CJC Open. 2020 Mar 27;2(4):249-257. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.03.009. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
Procedural volume and outcomes in patients undergoing VA-ECMO support.行 VA-ECMO 支持的患者的操作量和结果。
Crit Care. 2020 Jun 5;24(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03016-z.
10
Initial outcomes of a multidisciplinary network for the care of patients with cardiogenic shock.多学科网络治疗心原性休克患者的初步结果。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;74(1):33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 May 21.