Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 重症监护模拟:一项国际横断面调查。

COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.

机构信息

College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Pediatric Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;9:700769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

To describe the utility and patterns of COVID-19 simulation scenarios across different international healthcare centers. This is a cross-sectional, international survey for multiple simulation centers team members, including team-leaders and healthcare workers (HCWs), based on each center's debriefing reports from 30 countries in all WHO regions. The main outcome measures were the COVID-19 simulations characteristics, facilitators, obstacles, and challenges encountered during the simulation sessions. Invitation was sent to 343 simulation team leaders and multidisciplinary HCWs who responded; 121 completed the survey. The frequency of simulation sessions was monthly (27.1%), weekly (24.8%), twice weekly (19.8%), or daily (21.5%). Regarding the themes of the simulation sessions, they were COVID-19 patient arrival to ER (69.4%), COVID-19 patient intubation due to respiratory failure (66.1%), COVID-19 patient requiring CPR (53.7%), COVID-19 transport inside the hospital (53.7%), COVID-19 elective intubation in OR (37.2%), or Delivery of COVID-19 mother and neonatal care (19%). Among participants, 55.6% reported the team's full engagement in the simulation sessions. The average session length was 30-60 min. The debriefing process was conducted by the ICU facilitator in (51%) of the sessions followed by simulation staff in 41% of the sessions. A total of 80% reported significant improvement in clinical preparedness after simulation sessions, and 70% were satisfied with the COVID-19 sessions. Most perceived issues reported were related to infection control measures, followed by team dynamics, logistics, and patient transport issues. Simulation centers team leaders and HCWs reported positive feedback on COVID-19 simulation sessions with multidisciplinary personnel involvement. These drills are a valuable tool for rehearsing safe dynamics on the frontline of COVID-19. More research on COVID-19 simulation outcomes is warranted; to explore variable factors for each country and healthcare system.

摘要

描述不同国际医疗中心的 COVID-19 模拟场景的实用性和模式。这是一项针对多个模拟中心团队成员的横断面国际调查,包括团队领导和医疗保健工作者(HCWs),基于来自所有世卫组织区域 30 个国家的每个中心的汇报。主要结果测量指标是 COVID-19 模拟的特点、促进因素、障碍和模拟会议期间遇到的挑战。向 343 名模拟团队领导和多学科 HCWs 发出邀请,其中 121 人做出了回应并完成了调查。模拟会议的频率为每月(27.1%)、每周(24.8%)、每两周(19.8%)或每天(21.5%)。关于模拟会议的主题,它们是急诊科 COVID-19 患者到达(69.4%)、COVID-19 患者因呼吸衰竭行插管(66.1%)、COVID-19 患者需要心肺复苏(53.7%)、COVID-19 患者在医院内转运(53.7%)、手术室 COVID-19 患者择期插管(37.2%)或 COVID-19 母亲和新生儿护理(19%)。参与者中有 55.6%报告说团队完全参与了模拟会议。平均会议时长为 30-60 分钟。汇报过程由 ICU 协调员(51%)或模拟工作人员(41%)主持。80%的人报告说模拟会议后临床准备情况显著改善,70%的人对 COVID-19 会议表示满意。大多数报告的问题涉及感染控制措施,其次是团队动态、后勤和患者转运问题。模拟中心团队领导和 HCWs 报告说,多学科人员参与的 COVID-19 模拟会议获得了积极反馈。这些演练是对 COVID-19 一线安全动态进行排练的有价值工具。需要对 COVID-19 模拟结果进行更多研究,以探索每个国家和医疗体系的变量因素。

相似文献

1
COVID-19 Critical Care Simulations: An International Cross-Sectional Survey.COVID-19 重症监护模拟:一项国际横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2021 Sep 21;9:700769. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.700769. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

2
Anaesthesia simulation training during coronavirus pandemic: an experience to share.冠状病毒大流行期间的麻醉模拟培训:一次分享的经历。
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2020 Apr 30;7(1):58-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000643. eCollection 2021.
3
In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review.原位模拟及其对患者预后的影响:一项系统综述
BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2019 Dec 24;6(1):3-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000387. eCollection 2020.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验