Starreveld Daniëlle E J, Daniels Laurien A, Kieffer Jacobien M, Valdimarsdottir Heiddis B, de Geus Jessie, Lanfermeijer Mirthe, van Someren Eus J W, Habers G Esther A, Bosch Jos A, Janus Cécile P M, van Spronsen Dick Johan, de Weijer Roel J, Marijt Erik W A, de Jongh Eva, Zijlstra Josée M, Böhmer Lara H, Houmes Margreet, Kersten Marie José, Korse Catharina M, van Rossum Huub H, Redd William H, Lutgendorf Susan K, Ancoli-Israel Sonia, van Leeuwen Flora E, Bleiker Eveline M A
Department of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 30;13(19):4948. doi: 10.3390/cancers13194948.
To evaluate the short- and long-term effects of light therapy on fatigue (primary outcome) and sleep quality, depression, anxiety, quality of life, and circadian rhythms (secondary outcomes) in survivors of (non-)Hodgkin lymphoma presenting with chronic cancer-related fatigue.
We randomly assigned 166 survivors (mean survival 13 years) to a bright white light intervention (BWL) or dim white light comparison (DWL) group. Measurements were completed at baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1), at three (T2), and nine (T3) months follow-up. A mixed-effect modeling approach was used to compare linear and non-linear effects of time between groups.
There were no significant differences between BWL and DWL in the reduction in fatigue over time. Both BWL and DWL significantly ( < 0.001) improved fatigue levels during the intervention followed by a slight reduction in this effect during follow-up (ES = -0.71; ES = 0.15). Similar results were found for depression, sleep quality, and some aspects of quality of life. Light therapy had no effect on circadian rhythms.
BWL was not superior in reducing fatigue compared to DWL in HL and DLBCL survivors. Remarkably, the total sample showed clinically relevant and persistent improvements on fatigue not commonly seen in longitudinal observational studies in these survivors.
评估光疗法对伴有慢性癌症相关疲劳的(非)霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者疲劳(主要结局)、睡眠质量、抑郁、焦虑、生活质量和昼夜节律(次要结局)的短期和长期影响。
我们将166名幸存者(平均生存期13年)随机分为强光干预(BWL)组或弱光对照(DWL)组。在基线(T0)、干预后(T1)、三个月(T2)和九个月(T3)随访时完成测量。采用混合效应建模方法比较组间时间的线性和非线性效应。
随着时间的推移,BWL组和DWL组在疲劳减轻方面没有显著差异。在干预期间,BWL组和DWL组均显著(<0.001)改善了疲劳水平,随后在随访期间这种效果略有下降(效应量= -0.71;效应量= 0.15)。在抑郁、睡眠质量和生活质量的某些方面也发现了类似的结果。光疗法对昼夜节律没有影响。
在HL和DLBCL幸存者中,与DWL相比,BWL在减轻疲劳方面并不优越。值得注意的是,整个样本在疲劳方面显示出临床上相关且持续的改善,这在这些幸存者的纵向观察研究中并不常见。