特应性皮炎中的益生菌与益生元:利弊(综述)

Probiotics and prebiotics in atopic dermatitis: Pros and cons (Review).

作者信息

Fanfaret Ionut Serban, Boda Daniel, Ion Laura Mihaela, Hosseyni Daniela, Leru Poliana, Ali Selda, Corcea Sabina, Bumbacea Roxana

机构信息

Pediatrics Department, Béziers Hospital Center, 34500 Béziers, France.

Dermatology Department, 'Carol Davila' University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

出版信息

Exp Ther Med. 2021 Dec;22(6):1376. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10811. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) represents a chronic inflammatory skin condition in which the skin barrier is impaired; thus, the permeability is increased. Hence, there is a greater risk of allergic sensitization, as well as a higher pH and lower protection against resident microbes. Since this condition is currently increasing among children, it requires further study, as little is known regarding the pathogenesis that makes the skin prone to chronic relapsing inflammation. Trying to standardize the data regarding the use of prebiotics and probiotics in AD, we encountered tremendous variability in the literature data. Literature abounds in conflicting data: studies regarding prophylactic and therapeutic applications, different types of strains and dosages, applications in young children up to 5 years of age and above, usage of probiotics alone, prebiotics alone or synbiotics combined. There are also conflicting data regarding the outcome of these studies; some confirming a positive effect of prebiotics, probiotics or synbiotics and some showing no efficacy at all. The articles were divided into those assessing probiotics or prebiotics alone and a combination of the two, with studies showing a positive effect and studies proving no efficacy at all. We tried to critically analyze those articles showing weak and strong points. In summary, the most studied probiotics were the strains of and . The Severity Scoring of Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) index was used to measure the efficacy of the treatment. Most studies compared their results with a placebo group and the efficacy when seen in moderate to severe forms of AD in patients with other allergic diseases present. However, the results are difficult to interpret, as in many studies the authors suggest that the disease may have a tendency to improve in time in some groups of patients.

摘要

特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,其皮肤屏障受损,通透性增加。因此,发生过敏致敏的风险更高,皮肤pH值更高,对常驻微生物的防护能力更低。由于这种疾病目前在儿童中呈上升趋势,且对于使其皮肤易于发生慢性复发性炎症的发病机制知之甚少,因此需要进一步研究。在试图规范关于益生元和益生菌在特应性皮炎中应用的数据时,我们发现文献数据存在巨大差异。文献中充斥着相互矛盾的数据:关于预防和治疗应用、不同类型的菌株和剂量、在5岁及以上幼儿中的应用、单独使用益生菌、单独使用益生元或合生制剂联合使用的研究。关于这些研究的结果也存在相互矛盾的数据;一些研究证实了益生元、益生菌或合生制剂的积极作用,而一些研究则显示完全没有效果。这些文章被分为评估单独使用益生菌或益生元以及两者联合使用的文章,其中一些研究显示有积极作用,而一些研究则证明完全没有效果。我们试图批判性地分析那些显示优缺点的文章。总之,研究最多的益生菌是[具体菌株1]和[具体菌株2]的菌株。特应性皮炎严重程度评分(SCORAD)指数用于衡量治疗效果。大多数研究将其结果与安慰剂组进行比较,并观察在患有其他过敏性疾病的中度至重度特应性皮炎患者中的疗效。然而,结果难以解释,因为在许多研究中,作者表明在某些患者组中疾病可能有随时间改善的趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索