Department of Clinical Psychology, Tottori University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Japan.
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Healthcare, Kiryu University, Japan.
Ind Health. 2022 Apr 1;60(2):154-163. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2021-0051. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
The purposes of this meta-analysis were (1) to examine the associations between work engagement (WE) and the personality dimensions of five-factor model and (2) to determine how much variance in WE is explained by these five factors. We performed a database search for studies related to personality traits and WE, and 36 papers that reported correlation coefficients were selected for the meta-analysis. After correcting for publication bias using the trim-and-fill method, conscientiousness had the strongest association with WE (ρ=0.41), followed by extraversion and openness to experience (0.38), neuroticism (-0.36), and agreeableness (0.27). Moreover, 30% of the WE variance could be explained by the five-factor model (R=0.33, 95%CI=0.26-0.49) according to a path analysis using the weighted average correlation for unreliability. This proportion was higher than that from a previous meta-analysis of job satisfaction and job performance and was lower than that of personality and WE. Thus, to enhance WE, it is necessary to evaluate both the personality and the psychosocial work environment in detail.
(1)检验工作投入与五因素人格维度之间的关联;(2)确定这五个因素能在多大程度上解释工作投入的变异性。我们对与人格特质和工作投入相关的研究进行了数据库检索,选择了 36 篇报告相关系数的论文进行荟萃分析。采用修剪填充法校正发表偏倚后,尽责性与工作投入的关联最强(ρ=0.41),其次是外向性和开放性(0.38)、神经质(-0.36)和宜人性(0.27)。此外,根据使用不可靠性加权平均相关系数的路径分析,五因素模型可以解释 30%的工作投入变异性(R=0.33,95%CI=0.26-0.49)。这一比例高于之前对工作满意度和工作绩效的荟萃分析,低于人格和工作投入的荟萃分析。因此,要提高工作投入,有必要详细评估人格和社会心理工作环境。