• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

风险认知与政治:来自新冠疫情的证据

Risk perceptions and politics: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.

作者信息

Barrios John M, Hochberg Yael V

机构信息

Washington University St. Louis and NBER, United States.

Rice University and NBER, 6100 Main St. MS-531, Houston, United States.

出版信息

J financ econ. 2021 Nov;142(2):862-879. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.039. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.039
PMID:34658487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8502491/
Abstract

Politics may color interpretations of facts, and thus perceptions of risk. We find that a higher share of Trump voters in a county is associated with lower perceptions of risk during the COVID-19 pandemic. Controlling for COVID-19 case counts and deaths, as Trump's vote share rises in the local area, individuals search less for information on the virus and its potential economic impacts, and engage in fewer visits to non-essential businesses. Our results suggest that politics and the media may play an important role in determining the formation of risk perceptions, and may therefore affect both economic and health-related reactions to unanticipated health crises.

摘要

政治可能会影响对事实的解读,进而影响对风险的认知。我们发现,在一个县中特朗普选民所占比例越高,在新冠疫情期间人们对风险的认知就越低。在控制新冠病例数和死亡人数的情况下,随着特朗普在当地的选票份额上升,个人对病毒及其潜在经济影响的信息搜索减少,前往非必要商业场所的次数也减少。我们的研究结果表明,政治和媒体可能在决定风险认知的形成方面发挥重要作用,因此可能会影响对意外健康危机的经济和健康相关反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/fe5b995ff370/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/84976a49cc25/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/c4c774791a77/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/ee99f6c42ae8/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/a0b75ba3e249/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/cf32b57df23a/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/a9db32492567/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/6135f2e87236/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/da989fa94477/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/7f8315583e4d/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/fe5b995ff370/gr10_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/84976a49cc25/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/c4c774791a77/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/ee99f6c42ae8/gr3_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/a0b75ba3e249/gr4_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/cf32b57df23a/gr5_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/a9db32492567/gr6_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/6135f2e87236/gr7_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/da989fa94477/gr8_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/7f8315583e4d/gr9_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19da/8502491/fe5b995ff370/gr10_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk perceptions and politics: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic.风险认知与政治:来自新冠疫情的证据
J financ econ. 2021 Nov;142(2):862-879. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.039. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
2
Connections between viewing media about President Trump's dietary habits and fast food consumption intentions: Political differences and implications for public health.观看媒体报道特朗普总统饮食习惯与快餐消费意向之间的联系:政治差异及其对公共卫生的影响。
Appetite. 2020 Apr 1;147:104545. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.104545. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
3
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
4
Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19: Variation in Regional Political Preferences Predicted New Prescriptions after President Trump's Endorsement.羟氯喹治疗 COVID-19:特朗普总统背书后,地区政治偏好差异预测新处方。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2022 Aug 1;47(4):429-451. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9716698.
5
The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 US presidential election.2019冠状病毒病大流行与2020年美国总统选举。
J Popul Econ. 2021;34(2):739-767. doi: 10.1007/s00148-020-00820-3. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
6
Partisanship and the Pandemic: How and Why Americans Followed Party Cues on COVID-19.党派之争与大流行:美国人如何以及为何在新冠疫情上追随党派提示。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2024 Jun 1;49(3):351-374. doi: 10.1215/03616878-11066336.
7
Perceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines.感知风险、政治极化与遵循 COVID-19 缓解指南的意愿。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jul;305:115091. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115091. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
8
Politics v. science: How President Trump's war on science impacted public health and environmental regulation.政治与科学之争:特朗普总统如何发起针对科学的战争,影响公共卫生和环境监管。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.006. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
9
Nail in the Coffin or Lifeline? Evaluating the Electoral Impact of COVID-19 on President Trump in the 2020 Election.棺材上的钉子还是生命线?评估新冠疫情对特朗普总统在2020年大选中的选举影响。
Polit Behav. 2022 Oct 23:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s11109-022-09826-x.
10
Did the COVID-19 pandemic help or hurt Donald Trump's political fortunes?新冠疫情大流行对唐纳德·特朗普的政治命运是有帮助还是有伤害?
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 24;16(2):e0247664. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247664. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Response to collective threat: Russian invasion unifies Ukrainians across ethnic, linguistic, religious and geographic lines.对集体威胁的反应:俄罗斯入侵使乌克兰人在种族、语言、宗教和地理界限上团结起来。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 22;12(1):241005. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241005. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
The forces behind social unrest: Evidence from the Covid-19 pandemic.社会动荡背后的力量:来自新冠疫情的证据。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0314165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314165. eCollection 2025.
3
The Association of County-Level Presidential Election Outcome and COVID-19 Mortality in Colorado, 2020-2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemic responses under uncertainty.不确定性下的疫情应对。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 10;120(2):e2208111120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2208111120. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Gender roles produce divergent economic expectations.性别角色产生不同的经济期望。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 May 25;118(21). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2008534118.
3
Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020.恐惧、封锁与转移:2020年大流行经济衰退驱动因素比较
2020 - 2022年科罗拉多州县一级总统选举结果与新冠病毒死亡率的关联
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):E179-E186. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002098. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
4
Polarized Perceptions: How Time and Vaccination Status Modify Republican and Democratic COVID-19 Risk Perceptions.两极分化的认知:时间和疫苗接种状况如何改变共和党人和民主党人对新冠病毒的风险认知。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2024;34(4):624-642. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2023.2216461. Epub 2023 May 25.
5
Factors influencing risk perception during Public Health Emergencies of International Concern (PHEIC): a scoping review.影响国际关注的突发公共卫生事件(PHEIC)期间风险感知的因素:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 May 22;24(1):1372. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18832-z.
6
Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Testing Adherence in a University Town: Recurrent Event Modeling Analysis.评估大学城的 SARS-CoV-2 检测依从性:重现事件建模分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Apr 17;10:e48784. doi: 10.2196/48784.
7
Risk perceptions and behaviors concerning rural tourism and economic-political drivers of COVID-19 policy in 2020.2020 年农村旅游风险认知与行为和 COVID-19 政策的经济政治驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 9;19(4):e0299841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299841. eCollection 2024.
8
Systematic literature review of postponed elections during COVID-19: Campaigns, regulations, and budgets.关于新冠疫情期间推迟选举的系统文献综述:竞选活动、规定与预算
Heliyon. 2024 Feb 1;10(4):e25699. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25699. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.
9
A tale of two pandemics: The enduring partisan differences in actions, attitudes, and beliefs during the coronavirus pandemic.两重疫情的故事:在冠状病毒大流行期间,行动、态度和信念方面持久的党派分歧。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0287018. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287018. eCollection 2023.
10
Counter-stereotypical messaging and partisan cues: Moving the needle on vaccines in a polarized United States.反刻板印象信息传递和党派线索:在两极分化的美国推动疫苗接种
Sci Adv. 2023 Jul 21;9(29):eadg9434. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg9434. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104311. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104311. Epub 2020 Nov 25.
4
Civic capital and social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间的公民资本与社会距离
J Public Econ. 2021 Jan;193:104310. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104310. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
5
Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic.两极分化与公共卫生:新冠疫情期间社会 distancing 方面的党派差异。 (注:这里“social distancing”常见释义为“社交距离” ,但原文中该词似乎有误,可能是“social distancing measures”之类表述会更准确,直接翻译的话就是“社会距离” )
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104254. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
6
Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups.互联网使用的增加与美国人口群体中政治分化的快速增长无关。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Oct 3;114(40):10612-10617. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1706588114. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
7
Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data.利用搜索引擎查询数据检测流感疫情。
Nature. 2009 Feb 19;457(7232):1012-4. doi: 10.1038/nature07634.
8
Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality.作为分析的风险与作为感受的风险:关于情感、理性、风险与合理性的一些思考。
Risk Anal. 2004 Apr;24(2):311-22. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x.