Department of Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
Kirby Institute, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 20;21(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06793-2.
Plasma leakage is a precursor to life-threatening complications of dengue, but this group is poorly defined and not often reported in literature. Patients with Dengue haemorrhagic fever (DHF) as defined in the 1997 World Health Organization classification are often reported, and they all have plasma leakage, but some patients with plasma leakage do not meet the definition of DHF. The study aims to estimate the frequency of plasma leakage and DHF (as a surrogate of plasma leakage) in dengue and its variations based on virus serotype, geography, patient gender and pre-existing immunity to dengue. PUBMED, Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science were searched for prospective observational studies reporting on plasma leakage or DHF. Quality of data was assessed using the NIH quality assessment tool for cohort studies. Forty-three studies that recruited 15,794 confirmed dengue patients were eligible. Cumulative frequency of plasma leakage was 36.8% (15 studies, 1642/4462, 95% CI 35.4-38.2%), but surprisingly the estimated cumulative frequency of DHF was higher (45.7%, 32 studies, 4758/10417, 95% CI 44.7-46.6%), indicating that current medical literature over-reports DHF or under-reports plasma leakage. Therefore, a reliable estimate for the proportion of dengue patients developing plasma leakage cannot be derived from existing medical literature even after applying rigorous inclusion criteria to select homogenous studies. Plasma leakage is an important marker of "at-risk" dengue patients and standardizing its definition, diagnosis and reporting should be a priority in research and global policy.
血浆渗漏是登革热危及生命并发症的前兆,但这一群体的定义不明确,在文献中也不常被报道。经常报道的是符合 1997 年世界卫生组织分类的登革出血热(DHF)患者,他们都有血浆渗漏,但有些有血浆渗漏的患者不符合 DHF 的定义。本研究旨在根据病毒血清型、地理位置、患者性别和对登革热的预先存在的免疫力,估计登革热中血浆渗漏和 DHF(作为血浆渗漏的替代物)的频率及其变化。通过 PUBMED、Scopus、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Web of Science 检索了报告血浆渗漏或 DHF 的前瞻性观察性研究。使用 NIH 队列研究质量评估工具评估数据质量。有 43 项研究符合纳入标准,共招募了 15794 例确诊的登革热患者。血浆渗漏的累积频率为 36.8%(15 项研究,1642/4462,95%CI 35.4-38.2%),但令人惊讶的是,DHF 的估计累积频率更高(45.7%,32 项研究,4758/10417,95%CI 44.7-46.6%),这表明目前的医学文献对 DHF 的报道过多,对血浆渗漏的报道过少。因此,即使应用严格的纳入标准选择同质研究,也无法从现有医学文献中得出登革热患者发生血浆渗漏的可靠估计比例。血浆渗漏是“高危”登革热患者的重要标志物,标准化其定义、诊断和报告应该是研究和全球政策的优先事项。