• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导师制项目是否会影响卫生和医学研究领域女性的职业发展?对澳大利亚富兰克林女性导师制项目的混合方法评估。

Do mentoring programmes influence women's careers in the health and medical research sector? A mixed-methods evaluation of Australia's Franklin Women Mentoring Programme.

机构信息

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Franklin Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 24;11(10):e052560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052560.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052560
PMID:34690110
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8559124/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is known that women are under-represented in senior positions within the health and medical research sector. The Franklin Women Mentoring Programme (Programme) is a professionally facilitated, cross-organisational initiative designed to support career development for mid-career women. The objective of this study was to evaluate Programme outcomes reported by participants 12 months following its formal conclusion.

DESIGN

Explanatory sequential mixed-methods study design using a cross-sectional survey and semi-structured interviews.

SETTING

Health and medical research institutes in Sydney, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Health and medical researchers from the 2018 Programme.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in knowledge, skills, behaviours and research metrics directly attributed to Programme participation.

RESULTS

A total of 50 mentors and mentees participated in the cross-sectional survey (68% of the total cohort) and 14 mentors and mentees participated in the interviews. All reported changes to their knowledge, skills, behaviours and research metrics which were directly attributed to participation in the Programme. This included changes in knowledge and skills to be more inclusive (96% mentees, 83% mentors), resilience (88% mentees, 67% mentors), ability to have difficult workplace conversations (88% mentees, 71% mentors) and improvements in supervisory and team management (82% mentees, 75% mentors) skills. Positive impacts on promotions and grant opportunities were also reported. All evaluation participants believed this Programme was a worthwhile initiative for their workplaces to invest in.

CONCLUSION

Participation in this cross-organisational, professionally facilitated, structured mentoring programme has led to positive outcomes for mentees, as well as mentors. Reported outcomes indicate the Programme is meeting its aims to support the career development of mid-career women in health and medical research, while facilitating a more inclusive workforce.

摘要

目的

众所周知,女性在健康和医学研究领域的高级职位中代表性不足。富兰克林女性导师计划(计划)是一项专业促进的跨组织计划,旨在支持中层女性的职业发展。本研究的目的是评估计划参与者在正式结束后 12 个月报告的计划成果。

设计

使用横断面调查和半结构化访谈的解释性顺序混合方法研究设计。

地点

澳大利亚悉尼的健康和医学研究所。

参与者

2018 年计划的健康和医学研究人员。

主要和次要结果测量

直接归因于计划参与的知识、技能、行为和研究指标的变化。

结果

共有 50 名导师和学员参加了横断面调查(总队列的 68%),14 名导师和学员参加了访谈。所有人都报告说他们的知识、技能、行为和研究指标发生了变化,这些变化直接归因于参与该计划。这包括增加包容性的知识和技能(96%的学员,83%的导师)、韧性(88%的学员,67%的导师)、进行艰难的工作场所对话的能力(88%的学员,71%的导师)以及提高监督和团队管理技能(82%的学员,75%的导师)。还报告了对晋升和拨款机会的积极影响。所有评估参与者都认为该计划是其工作场所值得投资的一项计划。

结论

参与这种跨组织、专业促进、结构化的导师计划为学员和导师带来了积极的成果。报告的结果表明,该计划正在实现其支持健康和医学研究领域中层女性职业发展的目标,同时促进更具包容性的劳动力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/49a29c77b926/bmjopen-2021-052560f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/fd0b3fba4c77/bmjopen-2021-052560f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/2c2e2ec08140/bmjopen-2021-052560f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/49a29c77b926/bmjopen-2021-052560f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/fd0b3fba4c77/bmjopen-2021-052560f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/2c2e2ec08140/bmjopen-2021-052560f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/81ed/8559124/49a29c77b926/bmjopen-2021-052560f03.jpg

相似文献

1
Do mentoring programmes influence women's careers in the health and medical research sector? A mixed-methods evaluation of Australia's Franklin Women Mentoring Programme.导师制项目是否会影响卫生和医学研究领域女性的职业发展?对澳大利亚富兰克林女性导师制项目的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2021 Oct 24;11(10):e052560. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052560.
2
Mentoring for postdoctoral researchers in rheumatology: the Emerging EULAR Network (EMEUNET) post-doc mentoring programme.风湿病学博士后研究人员的指导:新兴的 EULAR 网络(EMEUNET)博士后指导计划。
RMD Open. 2020 Feb;6(1). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001139. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
3
Support, networks, and relationships: Findings from a mixed-methods evaluation of a mentorship programme for early career women researchers in sexual and reproductive health and rights.支持、网络和关系:一项针对性健康和生殖健康及权利领域早期职业女性研究人员的导师计划的混合方法评估的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 19;18(12):e0295577. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295577. eCollection 2023.
4
Formal intergenerational mentoring at Australian Men's Sheds: a targeted survey about mentees, mentors, programmes and quality.澳大利亚男性工作间的正式代际指导:一项关于 mentees、mentors、项目及质量的定向调查
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 Nov;24(6):e131-e143. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12267. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Feasibility and acceptability of a primary care mentoring programme for undergraduate students.本科生初级保健导师制的可行性和可接受性。
Educ Prim Care. 2024 May-Jul;35(3-4):101-108. doi: 10.1080/14739879.2024.2330999. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
6
The learning experiences of mentees and mentors in a nursing school's mentoring programme.护理学校指导项目中 mentees 和 mentors 的学习经历。 (备注:mentee 可译为“学员”“受指导者”等;mentor 可译为“导师”“指导者”等,这里保留英文未翻译,因为不清楚具体语境下更合适的中文表述。)
Curationis. 2015 Mar 24;38(1):1145. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v38i1.1145.
7
Positive Value of a Women's Junior Faculty Mentoring Program: A Mentor-Mentee Analysis.女性青年教师导师计划的积极价值:导师-学员分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Aug;27(8):1045-1053. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6661. Epub 2018 May 29.
8
Independent investigator incubator (I): a comprehensive mentorship program to jumpstart productive research careers for junior faculty.独立研究员孵化器(I):一个全面的指导计划,旨在为初级教员启动多产的研究事业。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Aug 6;18(1):186. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1290-3.
9
One year outcomes of a mentoring scheme for female academics: a pilot study at the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London.伦敦国王学院精神病学研究所女性学者指导计划的一年成果:一项试点研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Apr 7;11:13. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-13.
10
Developing mentorship in a resource-limited context: a qualitative research study of the experiences and perceptions of the makerere university student and faculty mentorship programme.在资源有限的情况下发展指导关系:对马凯雷雷大学学生和教师指导计划的经验和看法的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 14;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0962-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A mixed-methods assessment of the Australasian Society of Genetic Counselors (ASGC) Mentor Program.对澳大拉西亚遗传咨询师协会(ASGC)导师计划的混合方法评估。
Genet Med Open. 2024 Jul 2;2(Suppl 2):101865. doi: 10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101865. eCollection 2024.
2
Ensuring the future of otitis media research: Interest in and feasibility of a mentoring network program within the otitis media research community.确保中耳炎研究的未来:中耳炎研究界内指导网络计划的兴趣和可行性。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Sep;172:111693. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111693. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
3
Cancer research across Africa: a comparative bibliometric analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Supporting women in academia during and after a global pandemic.在全球大流行期间及之后为学术界的女性提供支持。
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 24;7(9). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg9310. Print 2021 Feb.
2
Women Physicians and Promotion in Academic Medicine.女性医生与学术医学领域的晋升
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 18;384(7):679-680. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2035793.
3
Advancing gender equity in medicine.推动医学领域的性别平等。
非洲癌症研究:一项比较文献计量分析。
BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Nov;7(11). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009849.
4
A roadmap of strategies to support cardiovascular researchers: from policy to practice.支持心血管研究人员的策略路线图:从政策到实践。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022 Nov;19(11):765-777. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00700-1. Epub 2022 May 16.
CMAJ. 2021 Feb 16;193(7):E244-E250. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.200951.
4
Female researchers in Australia less likely to win major medical grants than males.在澳大利亚,女性研究人员比男性更难获得重大医学资助。
Nature. 2019 Oct 22. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03038-w.
5
COVID-19 medical papers have fewer women first authors than expected.COVID-19 医学论文中女性第一作者的数量低于预期。
Elife. 2020 Jun 15;9:e58807. doi: 10.7554/eLife.58807.
6
Where are the women? Gender inequalities in COVID-19 research authorship.女性都在哪里?新冠疫情研究作者身份中的性别不平等现象。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jul;5(7). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002922.
7
Women's leadership in academic medicine: a systematic review of extent, condition and interventions.女性在学术医学中的领导地位:系统评价的范围、条件和干预措施。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):e032232. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032232.
8
Men and women differ in their perception of gender bias in research institutions.男性和女性在研究机构中的性别偏见感知上存在差异。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 5;14(12):e0225763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225763. eCollection 2019.
9
Advancing women in medical leadership.提升女性在医学领域的领导力。
Med J Aust. 2019 Nov;211(9):392-394.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50287. Epub 2019 Aug 11.
10
The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners.REDCap 联盟:构建软件平台合作伙伴的国际社区。
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208. Epub 2019 May 9.